User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 56
  6. 57
  7. 58
  8. 59
  9. 60
  10. 61
  11. ...
  12. 64
  13. 65
  14. 66
  15. 67

Thanked Posts by Obbe

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Good job, buddy.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The Bill Krozbydog vendor should speak like a typical Bill Krozby post.

    "My lawyer said I don't have to pay child support anymore"
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Before you say something about how you're a retard and don't want to have sex, remember how you felt about drugs before you tried drugs.

    Sex will be like that.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by NARCassist that's what you non-users don't get when you look at every negative aspect of heroin use, dictated constantly by the fucking media system, usually coz it reinforces your stuck up need to look down your nose at everyone else to make yourselves feel better about your sad little lives(coz lets face it, nothing else is working). the moment that hit takes over it's pure and utter unadulterated bliss. you couldn't be happier if somebody plonked a million pound in your lap.



    .

    Rat Park was a study into drug addiction conducted in the late 1970s (and published in 1981) by Canadian psychologist Bruce K. Alexander and his colleagues at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada.

    Alexander's hypothesis was that drugs do not cause addiction, and that the apparent addiction to opiate drugs commonly observed in laboratory rats exposed to them is attributable to their living conditions, and not to any addictive property of the drug itself.[1]

    To test his hypothesis, Alexander built Rat Park, a large housing colony, 200 times the floor area of a standard laboratory cage. There were 16–20 rats of both sexes in residence, food, balls and wheels for play, and enough space for mating.[2] The results of the experiment appeared to support his hypothesis.

    In Rat Park, the rats could drink a fluid from one of two drop dispensers, which automatically recorded how much each rat drank. One dispenser contained a morphine solution and the other plain tap water.

    Alexander designed a number of experiments to test the rats' willingness to consume the morphine. The Seduction Experiment involved four groups of rats. Group CC was isolated in laboratory cages when they were weaned at 22 days of age, and lived there until the experiment ended at 80 days of age; Group PP was housed in Rat Park for the same period; Group CP was moved from laboratory cages to Rat Park at 65 days of age; and Group PC was moved out of Rat Park and into cages at 65 days of age.

    The caged rats (Groups CC and PC) took to the morphine instantly, even with relatively little sweetener, with the caged males drinking 19 times more morphine than the Rat Park males in one of the experimental conditions. The rats in Rat Park resisted the morphine water. They would try it occasionally—with the females trying it more often than the males—but they showed a statistically significant preference for the plain water. He writes that the most interesting group was Group CP, the rats who were brought up in cages but moved to Rat Park before the experiment began. These animals rejected the morphine solution when it was stronger, but as it became sweeter and more dilute, they began to drink almost as much as the rats that had lived in cages throughout the experiment. They wanted the sweet water, he concluded, so long as it did not disrupt their normal social behavior.[1] Even more significant, he writes, was that when he added a drug called Naloxone, which negates the effects of opioids, to the morphine-laced water, the Rat Park rats began to drink it.

    In another experiment, he forced rats in ordinary lab cages to consume the morphine-laced solution for 57 days without other liquid available to drink. When they moved into Rat Park, they were allowed to choose between the morphine solution and plain water. They drank the plain water. He writes that they did show some signs of dependence. There were "some minor withdrawal signs, twitching, what have you, but there were none of the mythic seizures and sweats you so often hear about ..."[2]

    Alexander believes his experiments show that animal self-administration studies provide no empirical support for the theory of drug-induced addiction. "The intense appetite of isolated experimental animals for heroin in self-injection experiments tells us nothing about the responsiveness of normal animals and people to these drugs. Normal people can ignore heroin ... even when it is plentiful in their environment, and they can use these drugs with little likelihood of addiction ... Rats from Rat Park seem to be no less discriminating."[1]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    HEY KANTSTANDZYA
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    What about raising someone else's daughters?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by aldra not that I want to get into this, but didn't you take the opposite position last time we had this discussion? I distinctly remember saying 'compatibilism' is retarded and ill-defined

    Years ago I was arguing with lanny almost identicallly to what c.f. is arguing here. I do agree that freewill is incoherent unless defined under compatibilism. But now I feel that compatibilism is kinda stupid and either misses the point or changes the topic of what people mean when they claim to have free will.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by coughgel i am the solution

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Malice You are a moral monstrosity and have a robotic thinking style.

    Aren't you a proponent of superhuman AI? I seem to recall you really really wanting that.

    How is bringing superhuman AI into this world significantly different than brining regular humans into this world?

    Do we get the AI's consent?

    Wouldn't it experience a super human level of suffering?

    What about the cost?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Daily Get the fuck out now

    It was probably karma from all the bad vibes you send out.

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fromus Krokus >born with a form of mental retardation
    >disabled
    >autistic
    >has a birth defect
    >mexican
    >no friends
    >no one who cares about him
    >no reason to be alive
    >waste of oxygen
    >ugly
    >disgusting

    >born with a form of mental retardation
    >disabled
    >autistic
    >brain damage
    >fat
    >no friends
    >no one who cares about him
    >no reason to be alive
    >waste of oxygen
    >ugly
    >disgusting
    >asshole
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by RestStop I actually found the whole rainbow thread rather shallow and pedantic.

    So it goes.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Fromus Krokus

    i prefer girls who look like theyre humans

    Then tell her to wash her face and take out the fangs.

    And post a body shot.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 56
  6. 57
  7. 58
  8. 59
  9. 60
  10. 61
  11. ...
  12. 64
  13. 65
  14. 66
  15. 67
Jump to Top