User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 565
  6. 566
  7. 567
  8. 568
  9. 569
  10. 570
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596

Posts by Obbe

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I went to Debate.org and searched for "morality is subjective" and just picked out one persons opinion in a poll.

    In my own opinion what is right and what is wrong is a matter of perspective or opinion. I don't see how anything could be right or wrong without someone there to subjectively considering the thing to be right or wrong.
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I actually didn't write any of that LanMan.
  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Morality is a man-made concept that is defined by the society you live in; it is subjective. There is nothing called morality in nature. You cannot observe morality or test it in a laboratory. There is no absolute "morality." Many religious fanatics have tried to prove that morality is an absolute, just like God is real. They have even developed philosophies to prove it, e.G., metaphysics, and epistemology, which use meaningless circular propositions to prove their points. They use word games to prove their points. Both assume that knowledge, morality, Good and Evil exist 'a priori'. What does 'a priori' mean: 'a priori' knowledge, in Western philosophy since the time of Immanuel Kant, knowledge that is independent of all particular experiences, as opposed to a posteriori knowledge, which derives from experience. The Latin phrases a priori (“from what is before”) and a posteriori (“from what is after”) were used in philosophy originally to distinguish between arguments from causes and arguments from effects. Even murdering or killing humans is not an absolute; it is societal, e.G., killing in war is OK, killing someone attacking you with deadly force where you are in fear of your life is OK.
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    No, because I've made no claims contrary to those you've made. It is only you who have stated claims, and they are so far unsupported, and worse, undefined.

    If you're not going to claim anything contrary to what I stated then I'm not going to build any supporting arguments for my statement because I couldn't care less.
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Before I do that, will you give us some examples of what you believe is inherently or objectively right or wrong?
  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I can try. Morality is all in your head. Therefore it isn't objective. Does that work?
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    It certainly wouldn't happen in a westernized society.
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Right and wrong are subjective, nothing is inherently right or wrong, therefore you are a faggot.
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Ryan Rogers.
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    It would be great to discuss these topics with someone willing and able to communicate their opinions clearly. Bill Krozby isn't that kind of person though.
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I live life one day at a time.
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Yeah, as was discussed above, I think mathematics is or is like a language in that while it can be used to describe basically anything it's not the same as the thing itself. I do think math could be used to express or describe basically every aspect of reality, but I agree that's not the same as actually experiencing reality consciously the way (I presume) you and I do. It's like how we can use English to describe a sexual experience for example, but that is not the same as actually having that sexual experience. I also think Mathematics could be used to describe the same experience although it would be beyond my capabilities to comprehend, and again, it would not be the same as conscious experience itself. I agree that colours like red are not just some number representing a wavelength of light but is a word used to describe an actual experience, as are all words really.
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Ultimately nothing matters so there is no reason not to, except life can be awesome if you make it awesome so you would be missing out on that. There's a lot you can't do when you're dead. Here's a thought, instead of asking us if you should or shouldn't kill yourself why don't you ask yourself how you could make your life a life worth living?
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    My 2nd Home:






  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    He's too busy cucking you.
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    You're a fucking reptilian.
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    [greentext]>"My theory has more proof than your theory"[/greentext]
    [greentext]>Uses my theory to prove his[/greentext]
    [greentext]>Thinks this is solid logic.[/greentext]

    I never claimed multiverse was true I simply noted that it may be some individuals understanding of dimensionality. It is also stupid to say that "because if you believe in a multiverse, you would be open to the idea of a flat earth." This is pretty fucking stupid because if you believe in a multiverse you would indeed be open to the idea of a flat earth, or a universe where the natural formation of matter is a flat square rather than spherical. You would also be open to the idea that there is a universe entirely made of ants, a universe where you are sploo, a universe where totse never ended, a universe that is just a basket of fruit in a large white room. Furthermore you would believe all variations of any possible potentiality exist somewhere in some way. For me personally this is a bit far fetched and while things like multiverse and string theory have elegant and beautiful proofs, there are always holes and flaws in them.

    But more importantly if you believe in multiverse theory that doesnt mean that you must believe that the earth is flat in this universe. All it indicates is that you could imagine a reality in which the earth is flat. Further there is all the evidene in the world to say that the earth is spherical from NASA to standing on the beach and looking at a boat cross the horizon. In all our years of sailing and exploring, do you not find it strange that no one has yet found the edge? Further, is it not rectifiable with your theory that one can board a plane look out the window and see the curvature of the earth or send a baloon up with a camera and see the same at a high enough altitude?

    Bill Krozby will never address this.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Nobody watches your video links or cares that you post them. Why don't you write out your thoughts instead?
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    What do any of you dipshits even think "there are infinite dimensions" would even mean anyway?

    Some people would mean something like "alternate realities", some people would mean something like "dimensions other than length, width, height and time" and some people would probably mean something else all together, so clarification on what the OP is asking about would help this conversation out a lot.
  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Finally got my 2nd home location. You niggas ought to play more often.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 565
  6. 566
  7. 567
  8. 568
  9. 569
  10. 570
  11. ...
  12. 593
  13. 594
  14. 595
  15. 596
Jump to Top