Hahah, typical right reactionism. You say literally the exact opposite of the truth in order to make your own extremist position appear moderate.
No Lan, wanting some border control is not an extremist position. Niether is it racist, how well has immigration worked out so far? I'd love to live in a world where immigration is just called moving but when there is a state or more appropriately a welfare state involved this is simply not possible.
Immigration is even silly within the statist paradigm, although i suppose importing democrat voting mexifags is beneficial to the democratic party. Even if we accept the 'social-contract' we can safely say that a great number of immigrants have never paid into the system and therefore shouldn't be entitled to benefits. They go to the states and due to liberal social policies are immediately entitled to benefits and they're happy to make use of them in great number.
http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-Native-HouseholdsStudy related.
Besides, multiculturalism undermines social cohesion by eroding the trust of the populace in one another and between the diverse ethnical groups.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...176.x/abstractStudy related.
To conclude, instead of calling 'diversity-skeptics' extremist and bigots. I'd say they have the more rational approach to the situation and facts seem to support this viewpoint.