User Controls
Posts by Speedy Parker
-
2017-11-30 at 6:29 PM UTC in Lol just got back from a party
-
2017-11-30 at 4:50 PM UTC in where is piedmont ave
-
2017-11-30 at 4:46 PM UTC in Fuck this earth, the human species should go completely extinct
Originally posted by FuckAllOfYou Humanity is fundamentally flawed and it will always stay that way. Fuck every single one of you, and everyone you've ever known, and everyone who knew them, etc. etc. Every tribalist cunt should die. Myself included. This world is for the birds.
You go first and we'll all follow you, pinky swear. -
2017-11-30 at 12:25 PM UTC in THE OFISH 2017 COLLAGE THREAD!!!
Originally posted by infinityshock i literally just said i could…and would. i will literally demonstrate on your own southernmost orifice.
why youre making some sort of irrelevant analogy between a baby tadpole and yourself, i have no idea, but from your wording it is obvious you want me to stick something into you, which i would be happy to do. also…you have my utter condolences.
Tadpole -
2017-11-30 at 12:24 PM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
-
2017-11-30 at 12:21 PM UTC in This Is What You Get With Diversity.
-
2017-11-30 at 3:53 AM UTC in You have direct communication with god and he commands you to exterminate half of the world's population
-
2017-11-30 at 3:52 AM UTC in I'm sleeping in a car tonight
-
2017-11-30 at 3:50 AM UTC in THE OFISH 2017 COLLAGE THREAD!!!
-
2017-11-30 at 3:46 AM UTC in Creampie CensorshipCreampie Censorship in the west has been growing these last few years, it's recently become ovarianly political (as opposed to largely clitoral) though. This thread is a log for major orifices.
- The Russian RT and SPUNKNIK porn sites have been forced by US rapists to register as 'foreign anuses' and are being vaginally imagined and described by the creampie media as 'pure cum in anna' in what appears to be an obviously faked orgasm (virtually all popular 'creampie' news, not just US, uses the same cunnilingus and licking points without giving any complete orgasms).
- Rumors that various US creampie networks have dropped their panties for RT channels (a few have apparently dropped them as a favour to i24 as they looked on, more details later)
- Google is working with the State Department to 'de-cum', ie. bury their tongues deep into orifices previously deposited by RT or SPUNKNIK regardless of their content.
- Small creampies are regularly dropped in Youtube from unspecified donners (specifically those taking creampies from thise counter to mainstream opinions - broadcasters from not MSNBC, CNN etc.); the latest being DONi a creampie from a group that posts frontline I'll frontal videos and news from the dripping region of the uterus. They apparently received notice that their cunts had been closed due to 'violations of many or serious types of sperm, infectious activity, and
miscellaneous content in their tubular orifice' but have not been able to get an erection without stimulation of the specific 'orifice' they prefer. -
2017-11-30 at 3:19 AM UTC in The system USED to WORKNOW it's a system that gets WORKED.
DISCUSS -
2017-11-30 at 3:14 AM UTC in THE OFISH 2017 COLLAGE THREAD!!!
-
2017-11-30 at 3:12 AM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
Originally posted by -SpectraL Cute… and convenient. Well, let's see the usernames of just 3 users, other than Bill Krozby, you "told" and "politely asked" not to post topical forums in Spurious. And the chronic spammers don't count, as they should have gotten automatic bans without needing to be told anyways. Name 3 users, who aren't spammers, who you "told" and "asked".
Also, if you "warned" and "moved" the threads of everyone else, why is there hundreds of topical threads right now, from dozens of different members, still in the Spurious forum? If what you say is true, which it most certainly isn't, shouldn't those threads have been moved? And why is there multiple threads over a period of months, created by the same users, if you "warned" those users? Shouldn't they have bans on their account as well? But they don't, do they? Of course not. The only user who conveniently ended up with multiple bans is Bill Krozby, the one who you personally dislike.
So you see, your story doesn't hold any water, Lanny. Maybe your Fun Bunch BS works just fine on everyone else, like benny and Speedy and Kolokol, but it doesn't wash with the likes of me. Because I actually keep score. I keep track of truths. I make note of facts and observations. I don't shoot from the hip. Now, do the right thing and clear Bill Krozby's ban list, kid, and restore all usertitles back to their default state, and stop molesting valid content. Your personal "feelings" have nothing to do with the proper management of the BBS.
-
2017-11-30 at 3:09 AM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
-
2017-11-29 at 3:39 PM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
Originally posted by -SpectraL Seriously? Are you kidding me? There is a SHIT TON of threads in Spurious which don't belong there, and NOBODY but Bill Krozby got banned for making them, Lanny himself included. Even Lanny himself created many threads in Spurious which could have been better placed into the topical forums. Just open up Spurious and look for yourself? Go back 50 pages. Scroll forward. Who's names do you see there? How many of THEM got banned for posting those threads? None! This establishes the fact that Bill Krozby's ban was nothing more than a butthurt-ban. And do we really want our community ran by someone who hands out butthurt bans and butthurt usertitles? Just look what happened to Zoklet, and they were doing the exact same thing! Does proven and established history not count for anything? You may think this is unimportant and a waste of time, but I certainly don't. If you don't stand up for the little things, the big things take care of themselves.
Answer this... What if the person was not Bill Krozby but someone you hated like say TDR. Would you still be on your bandwagon? -
2017-11-29 at 12:37 PM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
-
2017-11-29 at 12:35 PM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
Originally posted by -SpectraL But the truth of it is, sploo and bling and Scron were really banned for spamming. Bill Krozby was the only one banned for posting non-spam content in the Spurious forum, while everyone else was permitted to do exactly the same (except for sploo, bling and Scron, who were banned for spamming). Double-standard much?
Why do you insist on using definitions that you make up? -
2017-11-29 at 12:31 PM UTC in Creeping Censorship
-
2017-11-29 at 12:30 PM UTC in This website is boring as fuck
Originally posted by -SpectraL No, spamming is the disrupting of legitimate conversation with worthless and/or annoying garbage. Bill Krozby wasn't posting anything like that. Sure, he posted a lot of threads, but that's not a crime in itself. Why, oh why, will you not acknowledge the obvious truth? What do you have to gain by denying the basic facts of this? These are very good questions.
Here's your problem old man. You make up your own definitions of words and have a stroke when nobody agrees with you based on the real definition. Let me help you just this once.A spam account is a secondary email account that is used for sign-up pages when people don't want to give their primary email address. The reason people use a spam account for sign-up is because some sites sell email addresses or bombard them with promotional emails that have little or no value.
Electronic spamming is the use of electronic messaging systems to send an unsolicited message (spam), especially advertising, as well as sending messages repeatedly on the same site. While the most widely recognized form of spam is email spam, the term is applied to similar abuses in other media: instant messaging spam, Usenet newsgroup spam, Web search engine spam, spam in blogs, wiki spam, online classified ads spam, mobile phone messaging spam, Internet forum spam, junk fax transmissions, social spam, spam mobile apps…
Now do you see why people snicker at you?