User Controls
Posts by RisiR †
-
2017-07-10 at 6:22 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDSWhy do we have to cam to see if you'll turn on me? (you'll get turned on, that's for sure)
I don't care about that, honey. It isn't my boyfriend. -
2017-07-10 at 6:20 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefsWhy did you make me stalk you?
-
2017-07-10 at 6:19 PM UTC in Recommend me CHILDREN'S BOOKS...Where The Wild Things Are.
-
2017-07-10 at 6:16 PM UTC in Inbox all fucked upHe probably has a server full of screenshots and recordings. Even hacked into your system and spied on you through your webcam while you were sleeping.
-
2017-07-10 at 6:12 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDSYea.... maybe you'll turn on me in the future. Huh?
-
2017-07-10 at 6:10 PM UTC in Inbox all fucked upI'd suck on that nipple that's about to slip out, lol.
-
2017-07-10 at 6:09 PM UTC in Inbox all fucked up
Originally posted by Kinkou You can't be sucking up to me each time I go to the chat then post some crazy ass shit on here about me and expect me to be cool with it. They're nice tits though, whatever
Don't you dare call me "mi amor" ever again, thats unforgivable
+1
HDL is just trash. You shouldn't even talk to him at all.
"mi cringeo". -
2017-07-10 at 6:06 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefs:)
-
2017-07-10 at 6:05 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDSMhmmm.. I could. I'm actually considering it which is making me laugh. You are pretty damn close to cracking me.
You really are persistent. I wish you could see my smile right now. Haha. -
2017-07-10 at 6:01 PM UTC in Inbox all fucked upHahaha...
-
2017-07-10 at 6 PM UTC in C H O O T I E B O Y SI got a drawing of her...
-
2017-07-10 at 5:58 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-10 at 5:54 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
Originally posted by hydromorphone fucking on a beach is overrated… who wants fucking sand in your cunt, ass, and grinding around your dick and balls? Nobody, that's who. I'd rather fuck somewhere far more comfortable than on a beach.
It's a sometimes thing. You have to make it special and come prepared. -
2017-07-10 at 5:51 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-10 at 5:45 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-10 at 5:36 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-10 at 5:26 PM UTC in Inbox all fucked upCan't you wait a little you thirsty whore? Hnnghhh.
-
2017-07-10 at 5:24 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefs
Originally posted by Open Your Mind The difference between science and religion is the difference between the quantified equations of mathematics and the unquantified equations of metaphor. Those who cannot focus their mental scope with sufficient precision to count must guesstimate relationships by comparing superficial attributes to derive meanings from their experiences. The errors of both science and religion are produced by logical deductions made from inherently faulty language, but the errors cannot be perceived by people who mistake their words for real things and their language for a real map. Philosophic disputes are word wars; those who live by their words also die by their words.
Conscious mind is a creation of words. Therefore, no one in his socially defined, right-thinking, right-handed mind can perceive anything not previously defined by words. Experiments have found that people lacking the words to describe subtle colours are also unable to distinguish fine differences in hues, but as soon as they are given the words to define the differences between crimson, scarlet, and vermillion, for example, they no longer see all reds as red. Poets expand the common Consciousness by giving new meanings to old words and by coining new words.
Words referring to abstract concepts are projections of spiritual structures from hyperspace into our mental space. We are unable to know the higher dimensions of the hyperspacial universe we live in because our culture lacks the verbal concepts for our minds to perceive what our eyes plainly see.
Scientific knowledge is nothing but verbal knowledge, and knowledge is the key to power; humanity is ruled by words. Words are ultraspacial structures created by abstracting common features of significance while ignoring unique features. Words amplify similarities and eliminate differences by wave interference. Words are the product of fusing all the unique images of several structures into an ultraspacial gestalt.
The gestalt represented by its abstract noun is not visible to the material eye because it is a ultratridimensional physical structure that is manifest to our Consciousness only as a form of what we conceive to be mental energy, more rarified than electromagnetic substance.
Abstract verbal concepts are understood only as they can be comprehended within the temporal dimensions of one's mind; a mind is perceived to grow to the extent that it perceives precedents and consequences. Athena is merely the god of intellect; the ruler of consciousness is Kronus, the Overlord of Time and Change.
The nemesis of abstraction is that the symbol becomes the reality, and the individual differences in the real world are occulted behind the Veils of Maja. As the focus of the mind shifts from the immediately tangible world to verbal concepts, the mind becomes separated from the body and both lose their health. Paradise is a myth about a preverbal Consciousness, before men created words and subsequently mistook the symbol (idol) for reality (God); the Fall of Man and his Expulsion is the consequence of worshipping verbally fashioned images. Philosophers pretend to lead us back to reality on ways paved with more words of higher abstraction, like devils promising to lead us to Heaven. If the devil is the Father of Lies, words are surely the Mother.
I think I understand, but there's nothing remotely useful in here other than the fact that you are trying to use nonsense as tool for understanding objective reality, which is contradictory. Is this like the old Watts idea that you can't have the one without the other? You are basically articulating that there is nothing objectively coherent in the text, which by the way is contradictory but also true at the same time. This is still a mathematical error, or only useful on the basis that it is not useful as a way to make people think and re-examine their own interpretations of reality. You write like a sophisticated Postmodernist jester like Cubronzo. -
2017-07-10 at 5:15 PM UTC in Recommend me CHILDREN'S BOOKS...
-
2017-07-10 at 5:14 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
