User Controls
Posts by NARCassist
-
2019-06-14 at 9:52 AM UTC in Has the Duke of York ever fucked The Duchess of Cambridge?all them royals are way too minging to bang anyway
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:47 AM UTC in Anyone fancy a lucky 15but yeah i will agree that some of them 15s are fit as fit gets
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:45 AM UTC in Anyone fancy a lucky 15i'd like to but getting busted for that just ain't worth it.
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:44 AM UTC in Has the Duke of York ever fucked The Duchess of Cambridge?
-
2019-06-14 at 9:38 AM UTC in Has the Duke of York ever fucked The Duchess of Cambridge?
-
2019-06-14 at 9:35 AM UTC in true storey bro
Originally posted by Firekrochfatty ^ did read.
and i gotta say, after this painful dose of nonsensical wall of text— i am so lethargically bored.. that i no longer have insomnia— sooo, i must thank you for that!😴
Now, as for my most sincere advice i have for you… would be:
7. Take your daily meds as prescribed, mothafuqer…!! & do it at the SAME time EVERYDAY, sooo…you don’t forget!
*nite, night.
well clearly he's well well enough right now that he doesn't need his meds anymore, so what's the point of taking them? i mean you realize how fucky the side effects of those types of meds are, right?
, -
2019-06-14 at 9:27 AM UTC in true storey bro
Originally posted by CoosCoosOnTheLoose Not even remotely. Im just a drifter, see. I drift from internet community to internet community, like an orphan with a peg leg
oh ok, well anyway all of us here at nis are extremely grateful for your in depth explanation of what totse and zoklet were for us, so thx.
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:25 AM UTC in I don't care if you like me.
-
2019-06-14 at 9:22 AM UTC in Has the Duke of York ever fucked The Duchess of Cambridge?why the fuck would anyone gaf
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:21 AM UTC in true storey bro
Originally posted by CoosCoosOnTheLoose You'd be exceptionally surprised how easily and skillfully an easy and large sum of money can transform the average person into an academy award worthy movie star.
ive experienced the absolutely worst of the horrors and psychologically crippling realities that money can bring about
are you totse2k1s new alt?
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:15 AM UTC in Do yall recycle?
Originally posted by Nil i don't, i also litter when it's convenient.
I mean I technically recycle old copper/brass, but thats because I acquire some constantly and it's worth selling. This is more of a market activity than a "i gatta seperate out muh trash for teh earfs" activity.
same, do gold, silver and palladium from scrap electronics an all.
. -
2019-06-14 at 9:09 AM UTC in I don't care if you like me.
-
2019-06-14 at 9:02 AM UTC in true storey broi get this feeling that there is a bad actor involved in there somewhere
. -
2019-06-14 at 8:44 AM UTC in true storey broi don't believe it
. -
2019-06-14 at 7:23 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?providing those greedy control freaks don't go using it as a cash cow and go tax the shit out of it.
. -
2019-06-14 at 7:13 AM UTC in Ever thought about getting pissed off?
-
2019-06-14 at 7:07 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?clearly sean you've really no, or very little, actual real life experience of real hard drug addiction. and like most people, just look at addicts and judge them based largely on the war on drugs propaganda, that like everyone else you've been exposed to your whole life. this is why your arguments are so weak here.
the fact is that drug prohibition is really only protecting the public from the harm that prohibiting the drugs in the first place are causing. and its not even doing a particularly strong job of doing that either.
. -
2019-06-14 at 6:49 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by HTS Like I said, they should. And coffee, after age restricting it for a while to make its criminality more palatable.
Maybe, but I put to YOU that not all of them started as total fucking losers. That their lives spiralled out of control because they started doing drugs and couldn't stop. People who, if they'd never had a sip of alcohol, would never have beaten their wives or raped their kids or whatever fucked up alcoholic stereotype you wanna dream up.
Not just that, but why should we make it easier to do drugs? I mean even if they're going to be worthless pieces of shit either way, maybe they could find peace at some point in life if their lives didn't spiral even further out of control via escapist drug abuse. We shouldn't write off worthless pieces of shit and just say "yeah, let them fuck up their lives with drug addiction, they're already useless". They can get better. You can't, but they can if they don't do drugs.
People see mice hitting the button for cocaine instead of food to the point where they damn near die, and they blame the cocaine. Yeah. Drugs are inanimate, but in vitro they change how you are animated. Significantly. That's why you're addicted to them. If drugs didn't have any effect, you wouldn't use them. It's not stupid to blame the thing that's having an effect on you, even if you are ultimately responsible for the fact that it's having that effect on you. If we got rid of the thing, you wouldn't be able to let it have that effect on you. And since you're obviously too irresponsible to do that for yourself, we have to do it for you. By force, if necessary.
Most of those crimes would still be committed by drug users regardless of their legality. The only crimes they wouldn't be committing anymore are the ones directly related to drugs. They'd still need money to get their fix, and like you admitted, they'd still be worthless pieces of shit. Why should we condone that? "It's too expensive" is bullshit. The safety and wellbeing of the people is never too expensive.
And if we wanted to go all the way with solving this problem, bullets are cheaper than any of those things. Kill 'em all and see how many follow in their footsteps. Making an example of drug users now and exterminating them is a cheap solution and will make future pieces of shit think before they stoop to your level. Maybe they'll turn their lives around where you couldn't, because they're more terrified of ending up in a mass grave than they are curious about escaping their miserable lives for a few hours.
drink and drugs won't make somebody beat their wife if they wasn't predisposed to that type of behavior in the first place. drink and drugs just bring out the real you is all. many people use drink and drugs and don't go doing shitty things like that, so that pretty much proves that reasoning. and you can't seriously suggest that drink or drugs can turn a normal father into an incestuous pedophile, surely?
you say they don't all start as losers, but there is something exclusive to all users that you cannot put down to their drug use that proves that reasoning wrong. their very first use. the very first time they ever use the drug cannot be blamed on their drug use obviously, yet they take that very first hit despite having been subject to the 'drugs are bad' mantra their whole lives, yet they go and do it anyway.Not just that, but why should we make it easier to do drugs? I mean even if they're going to be worthless pieces of shit either way, maybe they could find peace at some point in life if their lives didn't spiral even further out of control via escapist drug abuse. We shouldn't write off worthless pieces of shit and just say "yeah, let them fuck up their lives with drug addiction, they're already useless". They can get better. You can't, but they can if they don't do drugs.
well that hasn't shown to be the case over the last 50 or 60 years of prohibition so its not likely to change now on a mass scale that would have any significance.
and as for the expense, prohibition pushes the prices up to such a ridiculous extent that most people couldn't even begin to afford it. yet drugs like diamorphine and cocaine are actually ridiculously cheap to produce. a 30ml shot of clinical diamorphine costs less than 10 cents to produce. yet on the streets the same prohibited dose would cost 20 bucks.People see mice hitting the button for cocaine instead of food to the point where they damn near die, and they blame the cocaine. Yeah. Drugs are inanimate, but in vitro they change how you are animated. Significantly. That's why you're addicted to them. If drugs didn't have any effect, you wouldn't use them. It's not stupid to blame the thing that's having an effect on you, even if you are ultimately responsible for the fact that it's having that effect on you. If we got rid of the thing, you wouldn't be able to let it have that effect on you. And since you're obviously too irresponsible to do that for yourself, we have to do it for you. By force, if necessary.
seriously are you high? those mice are not only of lower intelligence, but are lab mice that have the most depressing existence living in a cage in a lab. they are all kept completely isolated so as to not affect the results, yet they are sociable animals like ourselves. they are having the end results of a loser lifestyle forcefully imposed on them. not surprising they'd do anything to break up the stress and mind numbing boredom and depression their existence must cause them.
and at what point during the last 60 years of prohibition has it 'got rid of it' for anybody?
. -
2019-06-14 at 6:14 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by HTS DietPiano, if drugs were all illegal and possession more strictly punished, this would never have happened. Sploo and Shamby would be productive members of society and still be close friends. And yet you think we should end the war on drugs. You're a monster.
wrong
. -
2019-06-14 at 6:01 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by HTS Drugs are one of the more self-destructive avenues of recreation. Recreational drug use is - by nature of it being recreational - totally unnecessary. You don't need to get high. Ever. Add to that the risks, and it totally makes sense to prohibit access. Of course you can say that harm reduction education and an educated populace would ideally never run into problems with legal drug use, but that is utopian nonsense. The reality is that people are fucking stupid. People will destroy themselves, their lives, and the lives of others if they're allowed to do drugs. Because they're fucking stupid. The government has a moral obligation to the people to prevent them from hurting themselves. You aren't crying about seatbelt safety laws, and it's the exact same concept. Why aren't you crying about that? Because you aren't a degenerate seatbeltlessness addict. You're a degenerate drug addict. 🤔
1. why don't they ban alcohol then?
2. that mainstream argument relies on the theory that taking drugs ruins peoples lives by turning them into a total fucking loser. here's a mind blowing theory for you, maybe total fucking losers are taking drugs due to frustration, depression, boredom or despair over the fact they are total fucking losers in the first place. i put it to you that those total fucking losers wasting their lives away with hard drugs would still be total fucking losers if heroin, crack and meth didn't exist. they'd just resort to alcohol or sniffing glue or summing, like all those other total fucking losers who drink excessively or sit down an alley with a bag of glue stuck on their face do. total fucking losers lives start going shitty so they inevitably start using drugs to forget and/or make themselves feel better about the fact they are useless pieces of shit.
3. people see their friends and love ones who are total fucking losers doing drugs and quickly without question blame the friends situation on the inanimate object they are sticking in themselves every day. rather than blaming the conscious semi intelligent entity that is sticking the inanimate object in itself. that way they don't then have to accept their friend is a total fucking loser and the authorities get to create a 'monster they can then use to scare the shit out of the population with, in order to force compliance, obedience and misguided loyalty through offering some form of illusion of security from the inanimate 'evil' object they have then just sold the gullible populace on. now as long as they keep pushing and repeating that 'drugs are bad' mantra, theyll have so many total fucking losers turning to it followed by an army of gullible and bewildered friends and loved ones who are now completely fucking brainwashed into the 'drugs are bad' propaganda and will spend their entire ignorant stupid lives repeating to others the same old completely debunked unproven theory like its fact over and over again like a non-stop chain reaction of mass hysteria. rather than just accepting the fact that their dear norman or sally is just a waste of fucking space idiot who's incapable of doing fuck all of any importance or general usefullness and would always have ended up an utter failure in life, probably due in a large part to how they were raised in the fucking first place, no matter what they did or didn't do along the way.
4. the knock on effects of prohibition is by far the cause of way more destruction and harm to the public at whole than the few measly side effects experienced by some idiot who doesn't know his limits. just think of how much crime is committed against innocent civilians every fucking day, non-stop, never ending. burglaries, car crime, muggings, frauds, violence, organised crime, millions of which directly committed by prohibited drug users and dealers every single day. think of all the money cost in insurances, prosecution costs, funding the police, prison system, court buildings, customs and excise, healthcare systems, DEA and FBI etc. and all that to try and stop summing that is just going to happen anyway.
.
