User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by antinatalism
-
2016-11-25 at 4:32 PM UTC in How much abuse do you think you would need to suffer before you turned full psycho.
Originally posted by antinatalism talking both from experience and general observations, more often than not what determines a psychological breaking point is the duration of a painful experience, not its intensity. the mind is designed to deal more easily with a short but extremely severe despair than with a long, repetitive agony that forks itself on a daily basis and leaves you in the most miserable powerlessness.
I'd say that I've gone full psycho after having to endure loads of shit for 3 years
WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU?! -
2016-11-25 at 11:51 AM UTC in I'm going to destroy this forumI am become bling, destroyer of words
-
2016-11-25 at 8:13 AM UTC in I haven't watched porn or done stims in months
Originally posted by antinatalism I still don't understand whether masturbation increases or not the risk of prostate cancer. the researches i've read draw different conclusions
I don't know either
But honestly I don't really care, I can't hardly stomach the thought of living another year let alone another 60
And I can't stomach the thought of having to have another human to relieve sexual impulses
Thank the jedis for porn
Post last edited by 180gr 10mm FMJ at 2016-11-25T08:15:59.780917+00:00 -
2016-11-24 at 6:49 PM UTC in I miss -SpectraLSpectral operates on Hellenic principle. He requires an antithesis to his thesis in order to feel complete. At Zoklet it was me and the rest of the Fun Bunch. Then at RDFRN he tried to dabble in forum politics once more, and Idio let him, for reasons unfathomable i might add. Remember the super secret special snowflake usergroup Idio had for certain forum members? It was mostly a cabal of totse2 faggots and Spectral IIRC. Well we know how that went, Spectral couldn't contain his autism and thus it was that Idio became his antithesis. Little did Idio and indeed Spectral know that Idio had accrued an adversary stronger in The Force than either of them, by name of Richard Burnish(Author of the Neon Bible). And lo a DOX was cast which would be the end of forum existence as we knew it for that time in our history. Moments before the shitstorm reached critical meme mass a young computer programmer from San Francisco got a stroke of divine inspiration(Or just a stroke i can't remember) and rolled a pirated copy of vBulletin5 on a Pentium 60 Personal Computer from 95' and spake thusly:
NO MODS, NO MANAGERS!
Spectral was never to have an antithesis again. And thus he waits in limbo... -
2016-11-24 at 4:10 PM UTC in the supreme gentlemanwen u think ur onley optiones is to belief it or not u r fukked
-
2016-11-24 at 4 PM UTC in the supreme gentlemanyeah you remind of you too
-
2016-11-24 at 3:26 PM UTC in Critical thinking is a rare skillLOL.
-
2016-11-24 at 1:08 PM UTC in Tips on how to come across as more intimidating.MMA = Mixed MARTIAL ARTS.....
I think I'll take you out first. You seem to be the most fun opponent of the people I'm going to crush and cripple.
Have a nice time, Enter. -
2016-11-24 at 8:13 AM UTC in HAPPY THXGIVING FAM
Originally posted by Bill Krozby ^says the euro nazi fag, to me its about family and thinking about what you're grateful for.
you frothy cuck
It's a sad state your country is in if foreigners know your history better than your nationals. -
2016-11-24 at 5:57 AM UTC in IRC or similar chat solution?Guys please don't be faggots and make a discord or some shit chatbox somewhere, use IRC like a man. A channel on Slashnet was good enough for the Temple and it's good enough for us.
-
2016-11-23 at 9:28 PM UTC in How can I make myself psychotic?take lsd 3x a week until u see demopns then work form there
-
2016-11-21 at 9:23 AM UTC in what kind of emasculated faggot would have a girlfriendHomosexuality is a gift. Throughout history the greatest individuals have almost exclusively been men. To be able to love them is truly a wondrous thing, the purest love of all.
-
2016-11-21 at 4:06 AM UTC in Ah fuck, I'm gay.
-
2016-11-20 at 8:40 AM UTC in MathematicsAntinatalism, I thanked your post because as far as I can tell it was an authentic, cogent response, not necessarily because I agree with it, but I'm glad my hodunk ramblings on the philosophy of mathematics aren't cast out into the void absent an audience.
Originally posted by antinatalism I guess that the three mathematicians you were talking about are godel, emil post and turing
Replace Post with Church and yee. Honestly I don't know much about Post other than I've heard his name in relation to the history of computability theory.the finishing blow to platonism: the fact that there are undecidable statements within a system implies that there's not such a thing as a perfect bijective function between the mind and the so called perfect platonic realm.
That's an interesting falsification condition for platonism. I'm certainly no platonist but there are complete and consistent formal systems. They may not contain arithmetic, but we could imagine the really hardcore platonist being like "well yeah but fuck arithmetic, here's a mathematics that can't express godel's theorem and BAM!". It would be a poor sort of mathematics, as least from the perspective of a public that expects what we're taught math is in grade school to work, but then it's a poor field that relies on public expectation for its legitimacy.However I find your critics of the analogy with the "do not disturb" phone feature kinda fallacious. The designers of a phone will know (virtually) every property of the phone they're developing, so there will be nothing to discover. But mathematics is on a whole different level of complexity. When cantor single-handedly created set theory he could have not predicted that the continuum hypothesis is undecidable, so this is something that has been "discovered" by paul cohen, but of course it was already a sort of "built-in feature" of axiomatic space they were working on. I dunno, man, it's fucked up and I'm getting confused, but I'd go as far as to say that the very fact that when you invent a system you cannot virtually know every property means that then everything else from that point forth is discovered.
I don't know, what's your experience with the development of commercial software? Nothing in 2016 is proved, almost every commercial software product is shipped with known (although generally minor) bugs, and the expectation that some slipped through the QA process. What are the status of such behaviors? Discovered or invented? They are the inevitable conclusion of the instructions the constitute software although we certainly don't know about them when we're creating same.
Ultimately the substrate from which such behaviors emerge are manifested constructs of the mind. There may be some isomorphism between the contents of our mind, and the language rules are expressed in, and the actual behavior out in the world that we see but we need not speculate some kind of idealized thing which each instance embodies. We can say that we, in a sense, "discover" unexpected properties of systems but ultimately if such behaviors are implied by the systems that house them then I'd argue they share the status as invented or natural that their superior system holds.About isomorphism between math and the real world, those are discovered too and since I think that the so called "pure mathematics" is an hoax and doesn't exist (fuck that faggot of harold hardy), I infer that every mathematical model will eventually be linked to something in the real world (that doesn't necessarily imply the opposite): for instance, category theory, which is known as the most abstract field of math, has been proved useful in many real-world fields (computational linguistics, sorting algorithms, AI and so on): ah, with real-world applications I talk about things that are discovered (such as new physics shit) and things that are invented (such as computer science stuff, artificial intelligence, automata theory). So math could be invented and sometimes only used for other things that have been invented and not discovered. Sounds very autistic.
I'm a little lost on what you're trying to get at here. It does seem like we can come up with formal systems with only trivial relations to the physical world. Consider the toy example of Hofstadter's MU puzzle. It's useful only, in so far as I can tell, as a didactic device. Sure you can say "well that's an isomorph to an educational process" but that seems to render the notion of a "pure" system as, uhh, trivially impossible because at very least you can say any system presented as evidence of pure mathematics serves as a model supporting the notion of a world in which pure systems exist but this trivializes the point to start with.Yeah I think we could define the mind as a mathematical object and eventually we will in a much more rigorous way. But we do now by now is that the mind is not a turing machine because we do not crash by bumping into the halting problem when we reason around undecidable statements (at least we can prove that they undecidable, a computer cannot)
I won't particularly defend the proposition that "the mind is a turing machine" but the fact that we don't implode when faced with a undecidable problem is not conclusive evidence of that fact. Not every turing machine is universal, many turing machines provably halt in a finite number of steps. The halting problem deals with a more general class of machine that is necessarily needed to support human consciousness. Consider the question "can a given turing machine halt with a decision in less than finite N operations?", this is a trivially easy machine to construct and such "timeouts" would seem sufficient to handle the human process of dealing with undecidable problems, at least at an extremely high level. -
2016-11-20 at 5:27 AM UTC in Mathematics
Originally posted by antinatalism how profound your thoughts! I AGREE! I AGREE! I AGREE!
Thy thoughts are so profound they confound my innermost being by believing and seeing the beauty of thine mind. Can it be? A soul like me? Is it perhaps destiny, should i flee or run towards this feeling, so appealing in retrospect perhaps freeing? A prospect, unseeing, unseen, to behold and held until death, in the end, is finally dealt. -
2016-11-20 at 4:37 AM UTC in ATTN: AntinatalismI thought you were here to help. Where are you when i need you. It's late, the forum is empty and i am shitposting all alone, i am playing depressing piano music in the background.
This song specifically.
You should imagine me sitting in a dark room with only the bleak glare of the monitor illuminating my desk upon which cigarettes and a bottle of whiskey that is missing two glasses worth are placed. It's a good thing you are imagining me from the back because that means you can't see me crying. My waifu Mal Mal and i got into a fight and i don't know if he likes me anymore. And i just... I wanna' know, can you show me? I wanna' know about these people like me...
And you know we've only known eachother for a short while and stuff, but i really like you, i think we would make great friends you know?
Wishing you were here.
Love, Sophie. -
2016-11-19 at 8:38 PM UTC in what kind of emasculated faggot would have a girlfriend
-
2016-11-19 at 8:18 PM UTC in odiumSex and orgasms are incredibly crude pleasures. Pay close attention the next time you masturbate or have sex. The simplistic/primitive dynamics (The pole with nerve endings concentrated near the tip, designed to penetrate deeply, the shape of the head possibly having been designed to scoop out competitors semen due to humanity's horrific relatively recent past, and present for many, is inserting into a cavity lightly ridged for added stimulation, which secretes mucus to self-lubricate, tightening via the surrounding muscles, the cervix having been found to dip down during orgasm, in a scooping motion, increasing the chance of pregnancy. Tab a goes into slot b and moves back and forth until a critical threshold is reached.) aside, focus on the feeling, it's like having your dopamine receptors tickled in the crudest manner.
Euphoria is the highest pleasure, the most magnificent form being wholly removed from sex. If you have never felt pleasures greater than sex, that truly is a pitiful thing. -
2016-11-18 at 1:10 PM UTC in odium
Originally posted by Sophie If you hear text on a screen you might want to have your brain checked out.
>not having cybersynthesasia
fucking pleb tier m8. If you dont hear the words in a post you arent a true space nigga. -
2016-11-18 at 10:46 AM UTC in odiumMe personally, because my fucking biology forces me to acknowledge their existence. At least with kikes and niggers I can ignore them.