User Controls
Thanked Posts by Sophie
-
2017-05-16 at 1:12 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshinThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-15 at 9:37 AM UTC in Turns out Anne Frank is alive. And has a youtube channel.
The resemblance is uncanny. Guess what? Turns out they're both kikes as well. Oh and apparently she is gay too.
Ayy lmao
This is her channel. Also, she blacklisted a billion words from her comment feed, obviously these include, kike, holocaust, jedi and more.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBGT7UNHg4LYsMH6UulRCSQ/videosThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-15 at 7:50 PM UTC in tfw to smart
Originally posted by Phoenix I personally prefer to immaculately order expansive arrays of colored pencils into neat and near perfect gradients/spectrums to reflect the spectrum I'm so very clearly on.
I legitimately get healthier debate there than I currently am from you, you astoundingly banal ignoramus.
"While the pencil farthest to the right might look white to you, it is actually gamma-ray colored."The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-15 at 11:15 AM UTC in What is your greatest talent?
Originally posted by DocFoster Like practicing witches. Salts herbs, candles, crystals, the whole 9. No matter what happens it's all i can come across. No matter what I do I keep falling into the occult. So much so that rituals and spells are a major turn on
Maybe witch craft is real and you are cursed to fall in love with witches for all eternity.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-15 at 8:36 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
Originally posted by Lanny
Your system is silly. You should just drop an evercookie when someone first makes their account, tie the value to their username like trip phrases. Let the register page check for the value of the evercookie against the DB and if it's found ban the original account for a week, ban the account that was trying to sign up forever, and for MAX PAYNE ban the IP for a week as well.
This would stop 99.5% of people from creating alts.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-15 at 10:02 AM UTC in Fucking chirping birds motherfucker!I know that feel. Fucking birds man...The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-15 at 8:59 AM UTC in tfw to smart
Originally posted by Oasis Find a ten digit number where the first digit is the number of zeros that the number has, the second digit the number of ones that the number has , the third the number of twos the number has…. and so on so the tenth digit is the number of nines the number has. There is only one number that is not logically invalid.
6210001000The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-14 at 8:02 PM UTC in Some theoriesThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-14 at 8:05 PM UTC in Some theories
Originally posted by snab_snib to a person such as myself who has been interested in and experienced in all manner of religion, philosophy, paranormal, conspiracy, etc stuff since i was a kid and unexplainable events occurred to me that made the ideas of 'greater reality' normal in my eyes, it was some dank ass motherfucking bomb fucking shit.
Oh so you have a history of mental disease. This explains a lot. Then in the other thread you call me retarded for saying "correlation does not equal causation". Sounds legit, nigger faggot.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-14 at 11:10 AM UTC in Can we talk about how fucking guilty Trump looks after firing Comey?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-11 at 7:35 PM UTC in Can we talk about how fucking guilty Trump looks after firing Comey?Comey deserved to be fired for dropping the Clinton probe. Besides, since the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the director of the FBI reports to the director of national intelligence who in turn serves at the pleasure of the president. This means that de facto the director of the FBI serves at the pleasure of the president as well. It was within Trump authority to fire him. Not only that, as is evidenced by Trump's letter to Comey the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General recommended his dismissal too.
Dear Director Comey,
I have received the attached letters from the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General of the United States recommending your dismissal as the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I have accepted their recommendation and you are hereby terminated and removed from office, effective immediately.
While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau.
It is essential that we find new leadership for the FBI that restores public trust and confidence in its vital law enforcement mission.
I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors,
Donald J. Trump
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/05/09/full-text-trump-letter-comey-firing/101491982/
It even states in the letter that the president appreciates Comey for informing him on three occasions that he was not under any sort of investigation. So when Comey informed Trump three times that he was not personally under investigation how doe it then make Trump look guilty for firing him?
Besides this whole "Russia stole the election" and "Trump works for Putin" narrative was bullshit to begin with. There has been zero evidence to support this. The only thing "concrete" that i heard about was malware that was found at Trump Towers that allegedly linked him to some sort of Russian threat actor. Although this was later proven to be doctored and reported on as such by the DOJ themselves."It wasn't very well reported, the Department of Justice revealed just last week that in fact some of these ties that they had witnessed between Trump Tower servers and Russian entities in fact, were stooged," Kredo said.
Kredo went on to explain that malware may have been installed on these servers to mimick contacts with Russian entities in an effort to portray that the Trump campaign had the Russian contacts.
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/adam-kredo-doj-found-malware-mimicking-ties-between-trump-tower-servers-and-russian-entities/
It is very easy to make malware look like it was made in Russia, and if Russian Cyber Command or whatever the equivalent over there is, actually did place malware on any of Trump's systems, or those linked to the US government they would have been more than capable of concealing the fact that this malware was Russian in origin.
Furthermore, a number of cyber security firms have claimed several threat actors involved with Russia were responsible for the DNC leaks, the DHS and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence came out with a joint statement. Here is an important excerpt.The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national
So the methods are consistent with what they would expect from Russia. Ok, what exactly did they find? A a joint report from the DHS and FBI said the indicator of compromise and "proof" that it was Russia was the YARA signature found in malware samples.
Yara Signature
rule PAS_TOOL_PHP_WEB_KIT
{
meta:
description = "PAS TOOL PHP WEB KIT FOUND"
strings:
$php = "<?php"
$base64decode = /
\='base'
\.\(\d+\*\d+\)\
.'_de'
\.'code'/
$strreplace = "(str_replace("
$md5 = ".substr(md5(strrev("
$gzinflate = "gzinflate"
$cookie = "_COOKIE"
$isset = "isset"
condition:
(filesize > 20KB and filesize < 22KB) and
#cookie == 2 and
#isset == 3 and
YARA recognizes patterns in how a software or malware is built. However, it does not detect new kinds of malware since it matches HASH and string signatures to ones that have been previously uncovered.
https://www.securityartwork.es/2013/10/11/yara-101/
Why is this important? Well, if i can get a malware that has HASH and string identifiers commonly associated with malware that has been used by Russian authors i can make it look like my intrusion into your system came from Russia with love. Like i said, if the Kremlin was truly responsible, they would author a custom malware that didn't get flagged by YARA rules as coming from a Russian source.
Besides, even if Guccifer 2.0 is Russian, there is no evidence linking him to the Russian government.
Post last edited by Sophie at 2017-05-11T19:37:42.410851+00:00The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-10 at 12:01 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind So if once a year, at the same time every year, a man came to your house and robbed you, you would just keep on paying him because he "makes" you?
No because in a stateless society i would shoot him in the fucking face. It doesn't matter how many police officers i shoot the government is going to escalate until i comply or die.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Aren't you the one who keeps saying the government isn't real and laws are just opinions?
Yep, but the people that work for what we call the government are real and so are their bullets.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-11 at 1:56 PM UTC in ShenanigansA hex curse upon you!
46 0x75 0x63 0x6b 0x20 0x79 0x6f 0x75The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-11 at 4:05 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Sophie, I really am genuinely interested in hearing your opinion. If you don't want to talk about it anymore I understand. I'm not trying to be a dick. But I'm not convinced.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Isn't that exactly what I suggested earlier? Convince others, together change society. You got mad at me for suggesting that. Wtf bro. Anyways, convince me at least.
From the statist point of view this would mean getting into politics and becoming the leader of the state. Also i am trying to convince others, but i don't want to compromise my principles in order to gain political power. I can only try to tell people why the state is an amoral institution that derives it's perceived authority from a monopoly on violence. If i become the leader of the state how can i possibly advocate for it's abolishment with a straight face. If you have to do something through force or the threat of force it just means you don't have the arguments to defend your position in any other way.
All i can do is argue the true nature of the state and work around it as much as possible through counter-economics, like bitcoin and other technologies, and peer to peer trade. this is the idea behind agorism, which is a more practical form of anarcho-capitalism.
The reason i reacted in the way that i did is because i thought you were saying that i should get into politics to change society. I'd rather do it through reason and counter-economics and i try to apply those things to my life to the best of my abilities.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind I already told you I think it's only fair that I contribute to a system that I benefit immensely from.
It would be fair, but only if the relationship between you and the system was voluntary to begin with.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Doesn't feel like I'm being stolen from.
And this what makes people not see how it is wrong. But just because it doesn't feel like you are being stolen from doesn't mean that when you come down to it, it still is actually is theft, fundamentally. No matter how much you think you may or may not benefit from it.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Feels like I'm part of a big team.
Being a part of a team is a voluntary association. Your association with the state is not voluntary.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Convince me why this is wrong. I'm listening.
You can feel however you want to feel about it. If you are ok with being stolen from, good for you. This does not mean however, that theft is good and proper by any rational standard.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-11 at 2:04 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Right so how do we get to that ideal society from where we are now?
By trying to educate as many people as we possibly can on the inherent amorality of the state.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind I never disagreesd with you that taxes are not moral. But taxes don't bother me that much. Should they?
I can't tell you how to feel, but in general when i get stolen from i am pretty pissed. Why aren't you?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-11 at 1:52 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind I just want you to explain your position more. I'm not trying to be a dick.
Ok, well i did explain my position to you in several posts. Moving to avoid having to pay taxes is impractical, like i said, it's not a question of whether paying my taxes is worth it for not having to move or not. It's a moral question, i propose that it is immoral for anyone to take my money without my consent under the implied threat of violence. The people in the government are not beyond moral scrutiny.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-10 at 6:50 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind They would have a right to attempt to arrest if you were benefiting from a system you were refusing to contribute to. You don't have to be part of their system.
They have no right to do shit, i never asked for any of this.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Why would you have to move to another country? Go live on a mountain. Go build a space station. Go live on a boat out at sea. Or hey, maybe you enjoy living where you are so much you could actively try to change the system, and make things better.
The point is i shouldn't fucking have to just to avoid being stolen from.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind "The Government will always be the government," lol so are you saying your ideal society is impossible? The thing you don't think even exists will always exist? There is no way for it to work in reality?
Don't be fucking coy with me. There is no fucking way for a single person to change the system. Also it's not impossible. here are some historical precedents that very closely resemble my ideal society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism#Historical_precedents_similar_to_anarcho-capitalism
Originally posted by Open Your Mind I think I agree with that because even if you managed to replace government with private companies, big business will eventually take over and become the new government.
And you know this how? Because you think so? Dank logic bro.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Of course there should be consequences. Do you provide services and resources to other people for free? If you are benefiting from a system, is it not fair that you contribute to that system? If someone is benefiting from the system you contribute to without contributing anything themselves, wouldn't you want them to face consequences?
I never asked for any of this, it was forced on me, forcing someone to do something is always wrong, period.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Your entire idea of what an ideal society should be is nothing but "imagine this" and "imagine that". The fact is that if you benefit from a system, it's only fair you contribute to that system. If you think the system is immoral it must be worth it to you to betray your moral philosophy, because you aren't doing anything to change it and continue to contribute to and support a system you believe is immoral.
The fact is you're not even listening to anything i am saying. What my ideal society would be is backed up by reasoning. And i already told you about "the system" and being forced to contribute to it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-10 at 6:11 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Are you saying it wouldn't be worth it that wouldn't be worth it? But that isn't exactly a good metaphor, because the tax man doesn't have a gun to your head.
No the police do. Like i've said before, what happens when you don't pay taxes? You get a letter, what if you ignore it? You get a bench warrant. What if you don't show up? They will send the goon squad(police) after you. What happens when you resist these goons? They will shoot you.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind You have options. You could move
Name one country on Earth where there is no taxes.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind you could try to change the system
It doesn't matter what i do the government will always be the government.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind or you could deal with the consequences
There should not be any consequences to begin with, that's the entire issue here.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Imagine the gang already bought up/ eliminated all theit competition.
Yeah imagine a meteor struck your face right now. Check mate statist.
I can come up with all sorts of "what if" and "imagine that" situations. That still doesn't mean taking my money without my consent is morally right.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-10 at 5:12 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind It must be worth it to you though. If it wasn't worth it, you would either move somewhere else, try to change the system, or you would deal with the consequences of not paying.
There is no question of "worth it" if i put a gun to your head and rob you of all you have and let you live in return would you say: "Lol that was worth it."
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Now if you got to decide to give your money to some gang claiming to offer you "protection" instead of paying taxes to a government, do you get to decide what they spend it on?
If i got to buy private security, or pay into a mutual security fund of course i would decide what i get to spend it on. Because A) nobody is making me buy private security and B) i can fire my private security and hire another firm if my security people fuck up, or spend my contribution in a way i don't agree with. Try firing the police.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-10 at 4:56 PM UTC in Your daily reminder.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind It wouldn't be right for you to benefit from a system you don't contribute to, either. As long as you are going to be a part of a society that provides services and benefits in exchange for your taxes, it seems only fair that you pay those taxes.
Yet, i don't have a say in what my tax money is spent on. Would it be ok if i just came to your house grabbed 200 bucks out of your wallet bought food for you for 50 dollars, then proceeded to spend the rest of the money on whatever the fuck? Of course it would not be right for me to do so, even if i spent the 200 dollars entirely on you alone. Because i don't get to decide what is right for you and what you need nor did you ever consent to me taking the money in the first place. It is morally wrong.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
