User Controls
Posts by Sophie
-
2020-10-15 at 8 AM UTC in The Recovery Thread (The Other TRT)
Originally posted by CASPER I think the universe protected me because i was stupid and naive. I got out of situations that i shouldve been dead or in prison. Feels like anything i do from here on out is gonna land squarely on me. And idk how i could go back to knowingly hurting people. Idk.
Knowingly hurting people in what sense?
Also as a side note. I always thought coke was overrated, that is until recently. I met a guy through a mutual friend who has this fire coke that's amazing. It doesn't even come as a powder it comes in tiny crystals that stick to each other and make little rocks. It's expensive more so than coke usually is but it's absolutely worth it. In case you are wondering i am coked up as fuck right now. -
2020-10-15 at 7:33 AM UTC in Lattice quantum chromodynamicsQuantum chromodynamics has to do with a certain kinds of charge. What does a lattice have to do with that?
-
2020-10-15 at 7:29 AM UTC in ChristianYes, quite. I got just the program to fix this particular problem. I don't usually do this because the technology used is derived from certain things i am not at liberty to disclose. But since it's you, i'll make an exception. I can send you the program but you need to keep it a secret, i can send you the pdf manual first if you don't believe me. You don't even need to get teamviewer or VNC, heck you can leave your remote dektop services disabled. All i need to know is your OS and your CPU Architecture. Now i can write a program to find out for myself but that's extra work.
-
2020-10-15 at 7:16 AM UTC in I was going to make a thread about...
-
2020-10-15 at 6:02 AM UTC in I was going to make a thread about...
Originally posted by aldra lul
I take it the second block is vuln scan output? sslv2 and tlsv1 are danger
Ya, and the CVE procession in the second block goes on for a significant distance if you go to the right. Lanny's code blocks do not word wrap, or line wrap rather which is good but holy shit it's like 10 lines high and 20 entries long.(If they were line wrapped) -
2020-10-15 at 5:36 AM UTC in I was going to make a thread about...uBlock origins and why it's gay. I'll go over one example real quick, uBlock uses functionality from NoScript but did it badly.
Correct me if i am wrong but NoScript uses or used to at least identify certain elements on a page and would insert tags specific to NoScript before loading the web resource entirely, presumably in order to block the stuff that was tagged. However uBlock's implementation didn't respect the NoScript tags or did so badly. I checked some history on Github and after some pressure he wrote this to address the problem.
(function() {
let noscripts = document.querySelectorAll('noscript');
if ( noscripts.length === 0 ) { return; }
let redirectTimer,
reMetaContent = /^\s*(\d+)\s*;\s*url=(['"]?)([^'"]+)\2/i,
reSafeURL = /^https?:\/\//;
let autoRefresh = function(root) {
let meta = root.querySelector('meta[http-equiv="refresh"][content]');
if ( meta === null ) { return; }
let match = reMetaContent.exec(meta.getAttribute('content'));
if ( match === null || match[3].trim() === '' ) { return; }
let url = new URL(match[3], document.baseURI);
if ( reSafeURL.test(url.href) === false ) { return; }
redirectTimer = setTimeout(( ) => {
location.assign(url.href);
},
parseInt(match[1], 10) * 1000 + 1
);
meta.parentNode.removeChild(meta);
};
let morphNoscript = function(from) {
if ( /^application\/(?:xhtml\+)?xml/.test(document.contentType) ) {
let to = document.createElement('span');
while ( from.firstChild !== null ) {
to.appendChild(from.firstChild);
}
return to;
}
let parser = new DOMParser();
let doc = parser.parseFromString(
'<span>' + from.textContent + '</span>',
'text/html'
);
return document.adoptNode(doc.querySelector('span'));
};
for ( let noscript of noscripts ) {
let parent = noscript.parentNode;
if ( parent === null ) { continue; }
let span = morphNoscript(noscript);
span.style.setProperty('display', 'inline', 'important');
if ( redirectTimer === undefined ) {
autoRefresh(span);
}
parent.replaceChild(span, noscript);
}
})();
It's called 'spoof_noscript.js' lol. Anyway, i've been messing with a bit of NodeJS and how Firefox works. In case i want to build an extension some day.
Anyway, enough of that, somewhere in the mess of js and html i found his name and website. Wasn't looking for that information but since i had it i decided to do some recon.
Lmao, look at all the CVE's,
Domain: http://raymondhill.net/
Server: Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS)
IP: 72.51.24.224
Hostnames: mail4.ehosting.ca
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Organization: Cogeco Peer 1
Updated: 2020-10-14T05:26:45.364977
Number of open ports: 9
Vulnerabilities:
CVE-2007-1890 CVE-2006-4625 CVE-2018-10549 CVE-2014-5459 CVE-2008-5658 CVE-2018-10545 CVE-2018-10547 CVE-2018-10546 CVE-2008-5557 CVE-2007-1380 CVE-2008-5498 CVE-2012-1172 CVE-2018-10548 CVE-2009-4143 CVE-2006-3011 CVE-2012-2311 CVE-2007-1461 CVE-2014-2497 CVE-2008-0599 CVE-2007-2872 CVE-2011-1468 CVE-2011-1469 CVE-2011-0421 CVE-2012-2688 CVE-2007-1700 CVE-2009-3294 CVE-2009-3292 CVE-2011-1467 CVE-2011-1464 CVE-2009-3291 CVE-2011-3182 CVE-2018-20783 CVE-2007-3007 CVE-2012-0057 CVE-2005-1344 CVE-2006-7243 CVE-2012-0883 CVE-2007-0906 CVE-2009-2626 CVE-2010-1130 CVE-2012-1823 CVE-2007-6388 CVE-2007-1864 CVE-2011-3639 CVE-2007-4465 CVE-2004-0885 CVE-2013-1643 CVE-2005-2088 CVE-2011-4317 CVE-2007-1581 CVE-2011-4885 CVE-2007-1285 CVE-2014-0098 CVE-2011-3348 CVE-2018-19520 CVE-2018-19396 CVE-2016-7478 CVE-2007-3799 CVE-2012-2143 CVE-2010-3870 CVE-2012-1171 CVE-2012-0831 CVE-2018-17082 CVE-2019-9639 CVE-2019-9638 CVE-2013-6438 CVE-2013-4248 CVE-2019-9637 CVE-2007-1376 CVE-2007-1582 CVE-2007-1583 CVE-2009-1891 CVE-2011-4415 CVE-2009-0754 CVE-2009-1890 CVE-2018-14883 CVE-2013-2249 CVE-2011-1153 CVE-2006-4154 CVE-2011-3607 CVE-2006-5706 CVE-2008-5624 CVE-2011-4718 CVE-2004-0942 CVE-2014-0237 CVE-2006-3747 CVE-2015-8994 CVE-2008-2384 CVE-2011-0419 CVE-2014-0238 CVE-2019-9023 CVE-2006-4812 CVE-2019-9021 CVE-2019-9024 CVE-2007-1396 CVE-2011-3192 CVE-2007-0909 CVE-2007-0905 CVE-2007-0907 CVE-2010-0425 CVE-2007-4658 CVE-2007-1825 CVE-2007-4657 CVE-2011-3368 CVE-2007-4652 CVE-2008-5625 CVE-2011-1092 CVE-2018-19935 CVE-2007-2727 CVE-2013-4635 CVE-2011-0708 CVE-2008-2666 CVE-2010-4697 CVE-2010-4699 CVE-2007-1888 CVE-2007-5000 CVE-2007-0910 CVE-2007-1452 CVE-2019-6977 CVE-2005-2728 CVE-2011-2483 CVE-2007-6750 CVE-2007-3997 CVE-2008-4107 CVE-2008-2168 CVE-2007-1824 CVE-2011-3267 CVE-2011-1466 CVE-2014-9427 CVE-2007-3998 CVE-2019-9641 CVE-2012-3365 CVE-2018-15132 CVE-2006-5178 CVE-2011-0752 CVE-2011-0755 CVE-2009-4418 CVE-2007-2509 CVE-2005-3352 CVE-2009-2699 CVE-2011-3268 CVE-2013-1635 CVE-2008-2051 CVE-2016-8612 CVE-2007-1835 CVE-2012-2336 CVE-2005-3357 CVE-2019-9020 CVE-2009-5016 CVE-2009-4142 CVE-2009-4018 CVE-2009-3293 CVE-2017-16642 CVE-2007-1887 CVE-2013-2110 CVE-2007-1885 CVE-2007-1884 CVE-2007-1883 CVE-2012-0031 CVE-2008-0456 CVE-2008-0455 CVE-2018-19395 CVE-2007-6203 CVE-2012-2386 CVE-2007-2510 CVE-2012-2376 CVE-2005-2700 CVE-2008-5814 CVE-2008-2108 CVE-2006-5465 CVE-2008-2107 CVE-2007-2844 CVE-2008-2050 CVE-2012-0789 CVE-2012-0788 CVE-2007-1001 CVE-2007-1718 CVE-2007-1717 CVE-2011-1470 CVE-2007-1710
Ports:
21/tcp
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
25/tcp Postfix smtpd
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
53/udp
80/tcp Apache httpd (2.0.52)
110/tcp
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
443/tcp Apache httpd (2.0.52)
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
|-- Diffie-Hellman Parameters:
Bits: 2048
Generator: 2
Fingerprint: RFC3526/Oakley Group 14
465/tcp Postfix smtpd
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
|-- Diffie-Hellman Parameters:
Bits: 2048
Generator: 2
587/tcp Postfix smtpd
|-- SSL Versions: -SSLv2, -SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, TLSv1.2
8090/tcp
Didn't do a reverse dns or sub domain search, i just thought the sheer amount of CVE's as seen above was amusing. I did find this as the registrant's email when i did a whois.
https://tieredaccess.com/contact/e92bcac0-c8b4-4a77-859e-d47dba155ba2
Pretty weird. -
2020-10-10 at 6:02 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
-
2020-10-10 at 5:59 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus edition
Originally posted by Sudo Ever want something so bad but if you get it you're a fucking heatbag who might lose everything due to its suspiciousness and raise eyebrows TO THE MOON? You feel you want it for mostly the right reasons though. Part of me says ITS PERFECT and the other half says ITS NOT RIGHT
SO CONFLICTING
Why yes, yes i do know that feel actually. -
2020-10-10 at 5:33 PM UTC in Most successful Totsean/ Zokleteer
-
2020-10-05 at 3:48 PM UTC in Any pythoners in here know how I can speed up this code?
Originally posted by Misterigh I've been using Python lately. Its actually really nice.
Hell yeah it is, coming from a C background gives you a good advantage when leveraging the ctypes lib to do some relatively low level stuff. Personally i think Python is one of the most versatile langs out there. That said, i have been learning the low level OG langs as well as NodeJS, so i think i have a nice spread. Node and related for prototyping and web apps, Python for bigger projects and C, and Asm for exploit dev. I want to be proficient in that sort of thing. C++ as well. As i've mentioned one of my long term goals is to be able to code in most modern programming languages. It's challenging but it will be worth it in the end. -
2020-10-05 at 3:37 PM UTC in Should the age of consent be lowered to 11
Originally posted by Kev i lurked too but you cant grab anything without looking thru the posts they make. small groups are a great way to become a target, i suggest bumming off larger networks. need that herd protection and they need pedos as proof of security. fair trade i think.
Well, the comments i did have the misfortune to read were pretty disturbing bordering on the deranged. That's why i never got involved with any sort of community aspect. Except on obscure chans but that was mostly 'lolicon general' type of content and discussions.
You are right though that small groups are a good way to become a target, but the opsec measures taken by all members were insane. Never felt the need to get involved with groups that require you to post OC as an admittance fee. -
2020-10-05 at 3:24 PM UTC in If you downloaded Ghidra, AKA the NSA debugger i got bad news for you.
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I just need to look at the code of game because I want to rom hack it and it seems easier to do that than try to understand what all the hex code means without any existing documentation
There's probably engines written for that sort of thing. Special programs that can recover, read, write particular data you're interested in through a nifty GUI. At least i'd imagine that to be the case. Modders and game hackers often have specific tooling, either written by them or based on official development tools. Not sure how the ROM hacking community does it. But back when i was modding games and running private servers for MMORPGs there were toolkits available for that sort of thing.
For instance when modding LotR:BFME there was a tool that could unpack certain files, allow you to read them, save them, import and export and allow you to make changes. WoW private servers were just a matter of setting up the base server components and all the game rules were accessible through a MySQL database. Change values in the DB and the server pack would integrate the changes.
Other than that i do a bit of console hacking on the side, which is a combination of hardware components that can be flashed with a particular tool that allows you to write 'hack' scripts. You compile them, flash to the hardware and boom. Fully automatic sniper rifle with aim assist turned up to one hundo. -
2020-10-05 at 3:10 PM UTC in Should the age of consent be lowered to 11
Originally posted by Kev i see. well what can i say, they are just as cancerous as the general public and are not nice to kids, worse even.
have you been to childs play, playpen and all those popular onion honeypots? would you let your kid or underage relatives near any of those freaks that frequented there? i know i wouldnt.
i dont think my view is in the minority either.
I've used some platforms, but it was to grab the content and bounce. Trading content securely within a small group is best for that sort of thing though IME. -
2020-10-05 at 2:54 PM UTC in Should the age of consent be lowered to 11
-
2020-10-05 at 1:29 PM UTC in Should we ban all pedophiles from this website?
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Your sick fetish is illegal. Deal with it.
Not a fetish. And legal status is legal status, it has nothing to do with morality or ethics. The law doesn't phase me, i pay attention to the individual impact my actions may or may not have on a person.
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Nope. 12 year olds dont have that maturity, because they aren't sexually mature.
Imagine the degree of arrogance you must have to think you have the ability to state definitively that you know what's best for every single 12 year old on the planet. -
2020-10-05 at 1:18 PM UTC in Should the age of consent be lowered to 11
-
2020-10-05 at 1:11 PM UTC in Lefties wish death upon Trump on Twitter, Twitter not enforcing rules against such stuff (shock)
-
2020-10-05 at 1:06 PM UTC in Should we ban all pedophiles from this website?
-
2020-10-05 at 1:02 PM UTC in Should we ban all pedophiles from this website?
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace blah blah blah
That 12 year old you raped? She's realized how fucked up it is that you took advantage of her. A 12 year old wanted sex? Of course they did. Teenagers going through puberty are horny as hell all the fucking time. It's not an excuse to go raping them. Let them fool around with other 12 year olds if they want. The most sexual interaction you should be having with kids of this age is giving them a handful of condoms as you tell them to be careful.
You and your deviant fetish are sick, and I hope the cancer from your cigarettes kills you soon, because you deserve it.
Thank you for illustrating my point. You have no conception of childhood sexual development and the related psychology. I've told you the following on multiple occasions, no rape occurred, the relationship was consensual, she initiated intimacy and sure she could have fucked a random twelve year old but she wanted to fuck me. And so i did, like i said, i was in an actual relationship with this girl. I met her family, she met mine. Dated her for a couple of months and after that we broke up amicably.
Your assertion that she 'came to realize how i took advantage of her' is just that an assertion you don't know this girl. And if you think you have the clairvoyance to determine what any girl of 12 thinks in a similar situation you're downright delusional.
And before you say 'hurr durr just common sense' no it's really not. People are individuals, young people also, some are more intelligent, some are more mature, and the same goes for adult women in reverse. It's pretty funny how you think i took advantage of her while she was actively pursuing an intimate relationship with me even before we started dating.
How about you talk to some girls that were in a consensual relationship with an older partner and ask how they felt about it huh? I've talked to multiple girls, adults mind you, that spoke to me about their experiences, granted some were bad since older persons in question were sadists or actual rapists, but there's a substantial number that told me in confidence that they were happy in aforementioned relationships. The reason they felt they could talk to me about it is precisely because i like younger girls and understand the underlying psychology. In fact i was one of teh few people these girls were comfortable with talking about the experiences they had because normies would turn the conversation into a victim narrative for the girl involved.
Which is a major contributing factor in why some girls experience personal and mental anguish, it's in no small part due to the people that tell them they should feel abused and feel like a victim.
I'm sure you're going to go on a tirade and say i'm lying and this is all anecdotal, but i know all the things and the many facets of this me and some of these women discussed. So before you go out of your way to engage with so called 'victims' and get their honest accounts you have no fucking leg to stand on and you're certainly no authority on the subject. -
2020-10-05 at 12:30 PM UTC in Should we ban all pedophiles from this website?
Originally posted by Obbe It really doesn't matter whether pedophilia is in the DSM or not, or whether it is LGBT+ or not, what matters is how people act. I would rather live in a world where pedophiles get the treatment they need to control their condition and the opportunity to live a normal life than a world where these people are either ostracized or preying upon children.
What if i arbitrarily decide that whatever your weird fascination with women with silicone tits of preposterous proportions is a condition, that actually harms women since it creates a demand for unhealthy and unnecessary body modifications at least in the domain of porn and i get the majority of the population to agree with me. Would i then be justified in compelling you to undergo 'treatment' for this 'condition' so you can 'live a normal life without contributing to the harming of women'. By force if need be?
All of this anti pedo BS is just a knee-jerk reaction and an astounding lack of insight into the psychology of the people you're demonizing and the psychology and sexual development of young people.
The most staunch anti people generally have some sort of childhood trauma which makes them incapable of considering anything regarding the topic in a logical manner. I am not saying you're a victim, it's just a pattern that seems to emerge often.
I think we can all agree though that rape is fucking bad and if you rape anyone regardless of age you should face the full force of the law as a consequence to your actions. It's just unfortunate that you and the rest of the anti crowd fail to appreciate that the topic is a lot more nuanced regarding all parties involved in the chronophile spectrum.
I guess not having to think twice before unleashing the vitriol is just an easy outlet for victims and people with latent sadistic traits.
