User Controls
Posts by HTS
-
2019-06-15 at 3:34 AM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?
Originally posted by Common De-mominator You plan to chop your dick off, right?
It's on the table. And I am appropriately shameful. I'm not proud that this is how I am, but it is how I am. I am deeply ashamed. Which is what keeps me to myself, instead of marching through the streets half naked screaming at people for thinking I'm fucked in the head. 😢 -
2019-06-15 at 3:31 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
-
2019-06-15 at 2:49 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
-
2019-06-15 at 2:47 AM UTC in Brands you swear by
Originally posted by GGG Like??
Crusader Kings 2, Europa Universalis, Victoria 2, Hearts of Iron 4, and Stellaris. To name a few. I really wanna play the same civ all the way from CK2 to Stellaris. They also published Tyranny and the original Pillars of Eternity. And Cities: Skylines. They are like .. the last bastion of PC gaming.
Closest thing I have to brand loyalty I guess, even if they aren't really a "brand". -
2019-06-15 at 2:41 AM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?
-
2019-06-15 at 2:37 AM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?
Originally posted by Erekshun Why is a kink shameful, tho? Not sure if I have any kinks.
Because kinks are fucking gross. Some people like eating shit. Some people wear diapers. Some people want to be raped. Their desires are weird, and bad, and they should feel bad. 🤔
Shame is just the feeling you're supposed to get when you stop acting like a normal person. It is probably the most powerful emotion responsible for keeping our civilization going. And if you aren't feeling it when you should be, if yoy aren't ashamed, then you should be shamed by the people around you. Shame.
Shame.
Shame. -
2019-06-15 at 2:32 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
-
2019-06-15 at 2:25 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Malice Metro Edition
-
2019-06-15 at 2:17 AM UTC in Congrats Toronto K.D. out. Raptor's WinIt's the slogan for Kraft Dinner here. It still fucks me up that people just call Kraft Dinner "Kraft Mac and Cheese" in the US. Like... it's so backwards. America - the home of corporate capitalism - doesn't use the Kraft Dinner brand name, yet they call acetaminophen "Tylenol" and adhesive bandages "Band-Aids". smh
-
2019-06-15 at 2:13 AM UTC in Congrats Toronto K.D. out. Raptor's WinGotta be KD.
-
2019-06-15 at 1:35 AM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?
-
2019-06-15 at 12:02 AM UTC in Midget with a knife vs full grown retard, who would win?
-
2019-06-14 at 11:40 PM UTC in Gimp wants to commit suicideLol are you SN's wife? How many racist cripples could there be out there?
-
2019-06-14 at 9:30 PM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?
-
2019-06-14 at 8:38 PM UTC in Ever thought about being in a gang rape?No? Nobody wants to rape me (let alone multiple people simultaneously), and I don't want to rape anybody. 😅
-
2019-06-14 at 6:18 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by NARCassist 1. why don't they ban alcohol then?
Like I said, they should. And coffee, after age restricting it for a while to make its criminality more palatable.
Originally posted by NARCassist 2. that mainstream argument relies on the theory that taking drugs ruins peoples lives by turning them into a total fucking loser. here's a mind blowing theory for you, maybe total fucking losers are taking drugs due to frustration, depression, boredom or despair over the fact they are total fucking losers in the first place. i put it to you that those total fucking losers wasting their lives away with hard drugs would still be total fucking losers if heroin, crack and meth didn't exist. they'd just resort to alcohol or sniffing glue or summing like all those other total fucking losers who drink excessively or sit down an alley with a bag of glue stuck on their face do. total fucking losers lives start going shitty so they inevitably start using drugs to forget and/or make themselves feel better about the fact they are useless pieces of shit.
Maybe, but I put to YOU that not all of them started as total fucking losers. That their lives spiralled out of control because they started doing drugs and couldn't stop. People who, if they'd never had a sip of alcohol, would never have beaten their wives or raped their kids or whatever fucked up alcoholic stereotype you wanna dream up.
Not just that, but why should we make it easier to do drugs? I mean even if they're going to be worthless pieces of shit either way, maybe they could find peace at some point in life if their lives didn't spiral even further out of control via escapist drug abuse. We shouldn't write off worthless pieces of shit and just say "yeah, let them fuck up their lives with drug addiction, they're already useless". They can get better. You can't, but they can if they don't do drugs.
Originally posted by NARCassist 3. people see their friends and love ones who are total fucking losers doing drugs and quickly without question blame the friends situation on the inanimate object they are sticking in themselves every day. rather than blaming the conscious semi intelligent entity that is sticking the inanimate object in itself. that way they don't then have to accept their friend is a total fucking loser and the authorities get to create a 'monster they can then use to scare the shit out of the population with, in order to force compliance through offering some form of illusion of security from the inanimate 'evil' object they have then just sold the gullible populace on. now as long as they keep pushing and repeating that 'drugs are bad' mantra, theyll have so many total fucking losers turning to it followed by an army of gullible and bewildered friends and loved ones who are now completely fucking brainwashed into the 'drugs are bad' propaganda and will spend their entire ignorant stupid lives repeating to others the same old completely debunked unproven theory like its fact over and over again like a non-stop chain reaction of mass hysteria. rather than just accepting the fact that their dear norman or sally is just a waste of fucking space idiot who's incapable of doing fuck all of any importance or general usefullness and would always have ended up an utter failure in life, probably due in a large part to how they were raised in the first place, no matter what they did or didn't do along the way.
People see mice hitting the button for cocaine instead of food to the point where they damn near die, and they blame the cocaine. Yeah. Drugs are inanimate, but in vitro they change how you are animated. Significantly. That's why you're addicted to them. If drugs didn't have any effect, you wouldn't use them. It's not stupid to blame the thing that's having an effect on you, even if you are ultimately responsible for the fact that it's having that effect on you. If we got rid of the thing, you wouldn't be able to let it have that effect on you. And since you're obviously too irresponsible to do that for yourself, we have to do it for you. By force, if necessary.
Originally posted by NARCassist 4. the knock on effects of prohibition is by far the cause of way more destruction and harm to the public at whole than the few measly side effects experienced by some idiot who doesn't know his limits. just think of how much crime is committed against innocent civilians every fucking day, non-stop, never ending. burglaries, car crime, muggings, frauds, violence, organised crime, millions of which directly committed by prohibited drug users and dealers every single day. think of all the money cost in insurances, prosecution costs, funding the police, prison system, court buildings, customs and excise, healthcare systems, DEA and FBI etc. and all that to try and stop summing that is just going to happen anyway.
Most of those crimes would still be committed by drug users regardless of their legality. The only crimes they wouldn't be committing anymore are the ones directly related to drugs. They'd still need money to get their fix, and like you admitted, they'd still be worthless pieces of shit. Why should we condone that? "It's too expensive" is bullshit. The safety and wellbeing of the people is never too expensive.
And if we wanted to go all the way with solving this problem, bullets are cheaper than any of those things. Kill 'em all and see how many follow in their footsteps. Making an example of drug users now and exterminating them is a cheap solution and will make future pieces of shit think before they stoop to your level. Maybe they'll turn their lives around where you couldn't, because they're more terrified of ending up in a mass grave than they are curious about escaping their miserable lives for a few hours. -
2019-06-14 at 5:23 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?DietPiano, if drugs were all illegal and possession more strictly punished, this would never have happened. Sploo and Shamby would be productive members of society and still be close friends. And yet you think we should end the war on drugs. You're a monster.
-
2019-06-14 at 5:02 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?It's weird how people think the answer to the failed war on drugs is "ending the war on drugs" rather than "implementing fascism and exterminating undesirables with extreme prejudice".
-
2019-06-14 at 4:57 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by DietPiano simply using drugs is not an activity worthy of persecution.
Again, it's the same concept as seatbelt safety laws. You can argue that not wearing a seatbelt is not an activity worthy of persecution either, but really we have a moral obligation to keep you alive. For your sake, for your family's sake, and for our sake. If Papa DietPiano dies because we let him get addicted to reefer and he walked into traffic because he was stoned out of his gourd, his orphaned children would be on our heads. So we say "okay, you can't use this because you're a human and consequently that means you're a fucking idiot". Just like we don't want Papa DietPiano flying through his windshield in a fenderbender because he was too stupid to put on a seatbelt. Only you don't complain about that, do you? Because you're a drug addict and you only care about getting your next fix, not about some stupid bullshit about seatbelts.
Stupidity related to drugs isn't just a one time thing either - it's a lot worse than the issue with seatbelts. Just to preempt any attempt at saying "well seatbelt shit only comes with a fine or a warning". Terminal human stupidity being the reality that it is, people will be stupid about using drugs. They will become addicts. They will OD. Whether it's legal or not, I think we can both agree that that's always going to happen. So why should we encourage it and increase availability. I would much rather have 100000 scared junkies worried about the law and getting stabbed/arrested when they go to buy drugs, than 200000 happy junkies (100000 of whom would never have touched drugs because they were scared) who aren't worried and can just be worthless fuckups.
Originally posted by DietPiano How's that war on drugs comin' HTS? Are you on the homestretch, omeslice?
"hurr current strategies aren't working so we should just give up lol"
That's retarded. We should reclassify all drugs as schedule 1 and increase the possible sentences to include life/the death sentence for possession of any amount. See how the war on drugs goes when the law is as lethal as what it's fighting against. 🤔 -
2019-06-14 at 2:47 AM UTC in Are you for or against prohibition(drugs)?
Originally posted by Nil Lots of sports are dangerous but they're not banned.
Athleticism is a net positive. Sports are not just recreational. There are risks, but sports make you healthier and teach people to work together. Not so with recreational drug use - it is simultaneously selfish and self-destructive behavior. Alcohol should also be illegal. And coffee should be age restricted and eventually made illegal too.
