User Controls
Are you smarter than me?
-
2017-04-05 at 11:27 AM UTCThe answer for most of you will likely be: yes
But take this test to find out:
iqtest.dk
-
2017-04-05 at 11:30 AM UTCIf you think an online test is a good way of measuring intelligence then we already have our answerThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-04-05 at 11:40 AM UTCI know for a fact that that site will give your PC cyber AIDS.
-
2017-04-05 at 11:53 AM UTCThis test is actually pretty good, it gave me close to the same score as the Stanford-Binet.
-
2017-04-05 at 6:05 PM UTCthat test sucks. normed on the internet population, 10 years old, no reliability or psychometric calculations.
http://media.iqlati.net/2017/02/EMC-30R.pdf
http://iqlati.net/emc-30r/ <- norm
It says correction and score report is 4$ but on the website news section he says he changed the scoring to free
http://iqlati.net/the-fee-for-emc-is-withdrawn/
I got raw score 18 = IQ 152
Reliability is 0.60, adequate but it's my favorite test
My highest score ever is on T.E.R.O.41
https://iqnavi.net/test/index.php?test=TERO41
Raw 34 = IQ 158
Reliability 0.89, very good. It's a "best of" test for best reliability, and I already took the tests it was made out of (TETR-IQ 154, ROTOR 140), so score might be inflated by 5-10 points. Not sure. TETR-IQ 154 was a second attempt because I x'd the window out a few minutes in out of boredom the 1st time, so maybe like 5 points inflated, also not sure.
Iqtest.dk was the first one I ever took, I was 13 and scored 100 because I got bored halfway through, figured I would score genius and then guessed for 10 questions. Then I didn't like my result so I retook it with full effort and got 116. For a 13 year old to score 100-116 on a test normed on an internet population I think is like "real" IQ between 115 and 145, I'll go with 130.
Post last edited by o_o (s p l o o) at 2017-04-05T18:12:14.960348+00:00 -
2017-04-05 at 6:12 PM UTCI did one with math history and pattern solving and some other shit. twice I got 180. OK I would be happy to get 135.
another one gave me a 30 IQ.
Here is the funny thing about that one. i'm slow but my precision is fairly on. there were 80 questions and I literally did 40 (was a bit tired) and 39 of my questions were correct out of 40 with 40 not done. They said I was completely retarded. severe mental retardation for being half as fast as someone who would of finished the test in an hour or less. I got nearly every question right but 1 out of 40. and I was a IQ30.
So these tests are fucking retarded as hell. -
2017-04-05 at 6:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 I did one with math history and pattern solving and some other shit. twice I got 180. OK I would be happy to get 135.
another one gave me a 30 IQ.
Here is the funny thing about that one. i'm slow but my precision is fairly on. there were 80 questions and I literally did 40 (was a bit tired) and 39 of my questions were correct out of 40 with 40 not done. They said I was completely retarded. severe mental retardation for being half as fast as someone who would of finished the test in an hour or less. I got nearly every question right but 1 out of 40. and I was a IQ30.
So these tests are fucking retarded as hell.
yeah but those arent real tests. evidence of statistical validity makes it real. reliability is the most important calculation for a test overall, because it proves that it's measuring an actual construct that exists. -
2017-04-05 at 6:17 PM UTCLogically for being slow I should of been deducted points on there 200 or less IQ test.
But since I got nearly 100 percent (minus 1) wrong.. you take away 0.4 points for that but add say 20 points for being a 98% or higher.
Either way.. my IQ should of been somewhere between 98 and maybe 116 which is just average IQ (Considering I was tired) or above average.
flawed as fucked! -
2017-04-05 at 6:20 PM UTCMy IQ is probably about 73, so, yes, I'm smarter than you.
-
2017-04-05 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 Logically for being slow I should of been deducted points on there 200 or less IQ test.
But since I got nearly 100 percent (minus 1) wrong.. you take away 0.4 points for that but add say 20 points for being a 98% or higher.
Either way.. my IQ should of been somewhere between 98 and maybe 116 which is just average IQ (Considering I was tired) or above average.
flawed as fucked!
wat
the test was bad. some are good. -
2017-04-05 at 6:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by o_o (s p l o o) wat
the test was bad. some are good.
If I had 180 IQ I would be potential wasted on a very large scale. and though They say it's my fault for failure .. I honestly got the worst education growing up. There was no "Leave no kid behind" or "Ebonics.. give him a fucking diploma anyways.
and I wouldn't want one like that. so I GED out.
I still need spell check a lot. and My spelling is getting worst. I'm hanging out on retarded boards where people are smart as fuck (like I know some of you are) but like to type all retarded n shittt and lingo it out n stuff an wutnot.
this starts to retard you a bit. that and shitloads of medication. so fuck it. I gave up caring at my age.
fiddle hereThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-04-05 at 9:21 PM UTC
-
2017-04-05 at 9:30 PM UTC
-
2017-04-05 at 9:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by o_o (s p l o o) that test sucks. normed on the internet population, 10 years old, no reliability or psychometric calculations.
I think you're probably right. I sent the test to the smartest person I know (Physics PhD, tested IQ 150+) and he got the same score as me. If it's normed on a self-selected internet population then it's probably going to underestimate 'actual' IQ. -
2017-04-05 at 9:33 PM UTC
-
2017-04-05 at 9:37 PM UTC
-
2017-04-05 at 9:38 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-04-05 at 9:39 PM UTC
-
2017-04-05 at 9:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by inb4l0pht I think you're probably right. I sent the test to the smartest person I know (Physics PhD, tested IQ 150+) and he got the same score as me. If it's normed on a self-selected internet population then it's probably going to underestimate 'actual' IQ.
you should do the ultra hard high range ones that dont autoscore. good hobby. brain workouts.
http://kanji-love.wixsite.com/high-range-iq-test/samlight this is my most recent one, 17/30 IQ 150, free for 6 more submissions
Post last edited by o_o (s p l o o) at 2017-04-05T21:42:29.004788+00:00 -
2017-04-05 at 9:40 PM UTC
