2020-11-16 at 4:51 PM UTC
Excellent, we happen to manufacture -80C freezers here in Holland.
happy_merchant.png
2020-11-16 at 4:51 PM UTC
Ranitidine is a good example.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today announced it is requesting manufacturers withdraw all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) ranitidine drugs from the market immediately. This is the latest step in an ongoing investigation of a contaminant known as N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in ranitidine medications (commonly known by the brand name Zantac). The agency has determined that the impurity in some ranitidine products increases over time and when stored at higher than room temperatures and may result in consumer exposure to unacceptable levels of this impurity. As a result of this immediate market withdrawal request, ranitidine products will not be available for new or existing prescriptions or OTC use in the U.S.
This shit's been on the market since 1981 and was only withdrawn last year.
2020-11-16 at 5:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson
Because they only found out 150yrs later?
Found out what? He just said "long-term effects" and 150 years. Clearly it would stand to reason that I could say after 149-years of studies I've been able to learn some long-term effects of smoking.
This is why I want to know the numb4rs man the NUMBEEERSS. I guess it just has to be just a randomly decided number that the consensus agrees upon as a good one. Like the number they decide for when abortions should be illegal or why 18 was chosen for most states as the consent age when others say 17 or 16.
But who knows maybe nothing should be considered to have been tested in the long-term because it's still relatively short in relation to the time left in the future!!!
Actually I just figured it out. Smoking for example, wouldnt need 150 years to have its long-term effects studied. Nobody lives that long anyway. It's just some number, like 20 years. But why not 19? Because 19 years is short term effects. Why? Because I said so.
Thank you
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-11-16 at 5:25 PM UTC
Well, I'm glad we cleared that up.
2020-11-18 at 12:03 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
as I understand it the scary science thing itself doesn't live long outside of a living organism, and the deep cold is meant to put it into a sort of cryogenic stasis until it's reintroduced to a living host.
I'm not sure why they went with scary science thing instead of the standard way of sequencing components from the dead virus like the Russians did, if it's because the scary science thing method is more resistant to mutations or just because they want to sell medical refridgeration equipment
2020-11-18 at 12:13 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
also I don't buy into the 'mark of the beast' stuff but I have no intention of getting a vaccine. the whole situation is way too shady
2020-11-18 at 1:25 PM UTC
They upped the % to 95%...how convenient in light of the other guys 94.5% claim...
