User Controls
teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-04-27 at 4:27 PM UTC
-
2017-04-27 at 6:43 PM UTCI wanna be a zimmy
-
2017-04-27 at 6:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by RisiR That would be a great fight. Interesting.
I think Dana would actually want Nate to win because that's gonna be big money again if he fights Conor and I think Conor would prefer Nate, as well.
Make it happen! Don't let them rot on the shelves because they ask for better fights after +10 years in the company you billion dollar business fags. Let them fight!
If Nate got the belt, Dana would have to pay him a decent rate instead on what is on his shitty contract. Also if Nate beats Conor, there will be a fourth fight, probably an instant rematch. I just don't think the Diaz bros are that good. Nate might have the belt for one fight. -
2017-04-27 at 7:02 PM UTCNot transparent they're unseen
-
2017-04-27 at 7:20 PM UTCi keep on eating butter to get high
gabapentin is cool -
2017-04-27 at 9:46 PM UTC"A Brief Essay on Existentialism, Secular Buddhism, and the Nature of Existence"
Yes, I can't recall why, but my mind came back to a few posts, 1 in particular, I made about 9 months ago. There was a completion of the idea, the concept, and I finally grasped what may be a coherent theory. Of course, it's always possible that I just went off the deep end due to how unbelievably fucked up I am and my life is, you should always question yourself and your sanity, especially if you feel you've come to a satisfying conclusion on some things. Does it provide certainty, an impossibility of error? No, of course not, there could always be some critical error stemming from the limitations of biology or the nature of existence, but even our idea of those concepts could turn out to be fundamentally flawed. For example, an interesting argument against Benatarian Antinatalism I came across is a variation of the many worlds theory and the interpretation that any positive action in this world would simply invariably lead to/imply the creation of/that a world with the negative action would exist; in one world someone is born, in another another isn't. This has terribly disturbing implications, of course, and is it's critical and practical undoing, that we should err on the side of caution, that it isn't confirmed.
https://niggasin.space/thread/206?p=197#post-9638
God, I really need something to calm down the excess neurological activity inherent to ASD (autism spectrum disorders). Not sure if it was the alcohol withdrawals, but I had odd sensations last night that could be right of the brink of mild epilepsy. It's perfectly possible that my biological/genetic makeup may have naturally lead to this level, where an insufficient amount of synaptic pruning and abnormally low effective GABAergic levels, stemming from a deficit in the pathway. You know, somewhat of a running gag, but I wonder if this is what Lanny's affinity towards alcoholism stems from. I recall him explicitly stating that he finds benzos concerningly enjoyable, which I consider to be less harmful than alcohol, in the amount taken to elicit the equivalent hedonically positive effect. Someone in the high paying FiDi compsci sector could certainly understand the incredibly racing mind trait that can also be prevalent, the need to consume information, to systemize.
Related to the above, a thought I've had about PhDs in certain sectors of academia, which was remarked upon in the West Hunt blog, primarily written on by the Author of the 10,000 Year Explosion (must read), is that he found that some of them tend to be incredibly "squirrelly" (definitely describes me. Oh, and amygdala hypertrophy may have a strong implication in all this as well, subsequent negative emotional hypersensitivity in part largely mediated by a hypersensitivity to norepinephrine release triggered by the neurological effects of the stress response primarily via norepinephrine release) and there's this sort of propensity towards monomania, this obsessive compulsion to fixate on one subject and feel a desire to attain complete understanding of it. The problem is that obsessive compulsions don't satisfy your innate biologically mediated psychological needs as a human being and you can indeed find yourself, eventually, completely miserable because you have such an innate difficulty in recognizing and accepting your emotions, which you may well have come to see as an illogical indignation, a barrier on the path to true mastery over the self, the emotional/social needs inherent to human beings, which can become harder over time as you age if you don't find someone as a lifelong partner which you can accept, becoming increasingly more difficult over time as you progress among this path. No one remains in stasis. Ask yourself, how am I going to be in 20 years if this is who I am now, and consider how unbelievably alienated you can become outside of academia.
And, of course, I am aware of what I have written and how it will be perceived. This is autism/Asperger's in motion, and it can be absolutely terrifying. To finally, after a decade +, break through to the other side. -
2017-04-27 at 9:51 PM UTCdawwtism
-
2017-04-27 at 9:51 PM UTCyou're disabled
-
2017-04-27 at 10:16 PM UTCI get high on cough syrup to impress pretty girls
-
2017-04-27 at 10:25 PM UTCI just broke my 3 year bundy sobriety. Oopsy daisy!
-
2017-04-27 at 10:32 PM UTC
-
2017-04-27 at 10:34 PM UTC
-
2017-04-27 at 10:45 PM UTC^ Indeed, I can barely take care of myself at this point. There are people with enormously high IQs and ASD who can barely take care of themselves. IQ really isn't all there is, although, imo, the overwhelming majority of attempts to belittle it, generally stemming from some aspects of leftist ideology, are absolutely false. For example, there are people who have enormously high IQs, could breeze through college courses if they really wanted to, and yet are even unable to tie their shoes without an assistant. What I would simplify IQ/the general factor of intelligence/general intelligence as being, which I've stated as before, is the ability to deal with complexity a vast array of data that you're able to develop into coherence. That's not the same as being happy or doing well in life from the perspective of others, which is of course molded by the pressures of sexual/evolutionary selection.
You just have to trim down those excessive synapses, raise effective GABA levels, lower levels of chronic systemic, particularly gut and brain, inflammation, along with general serotonin levels, which are commonly simplified as modulating levels of general mood//basal hedonic tone, and I postulate may primarily be involved in modulating aspects of social interaction (Is Serotonin an Upper or a Downer is a particularly fascinating paper tangentially related to the subject).\
FUCK!!! If I overcome severe depression (about 40/44 baseline at this point) and actually manage to recover, which I likely will considering how incredibly unhealthy this environment and being unmedicated is, I know it's just going to ramp up to a full blown fixation where I'm just functioning as an infovore on steroids. I know I have to set schedules, create a regimented lifestyle, with regular breaks involving some form of casual activity, particularly involving social interaction. It could just go beyond any level it has before; severe depression is correlated with strong cognitive decline/the ability to utilize your willpower/muster any motivation, and if you persevere and manage to break through it's just going to trigger this incremental rush of fanatical mental activity and I don't know if I'll be able to contain it and find a healthy outlet. -
2017-04-27 at 10:52 PM UTCtfw having a tolerance gets you higher and you get less side effects.
-
2017-04-27 at 11 PM UTC
Originally posted by 1337 If Nate got the belt, Dana would have to pay him a decent rate instead on what is on his shitty contract. Also if Nate beats Conor, there will be a fourth fight, probably an instant rematch. I just don't think the Diaz bros are that good. Nate might have the belt for one fight.
Nate once got a Honda Civic all riced out instead of a Bentley. Haha.
I don't really give a fuck about the belts and the rankings never made sense anyway. They need some real experts who understand the game as matchmakers.
Kimbo vs Dada made some good money but it was just terrible to watch.
Triple G or Lomachenko? -
2017-04-27 at 11:11 PM UTCbundy has changed. Not me.
-
2017-04-27 at 11:15 PM UTC
-
2017-04-27 at 11:19 PM UTC
-
2017-04-27 at 11:19 PM UTCI don't know what to do. WtfThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-04-27 at 11:20 PM UTC
