User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-06-14 at 12:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain It's more that Lanny is a successful college educated computer engineer pursuing his Masters, meanwhile you huff glue in your mom's basement and can't even maintain an A grade GPA.
https://thepolymathicinstitute.blogspot.com/p/the-inappropriately-excluded.htmlSo, if your IQ is 140 something, the above should serve as a warning that you may be facing related career challenges. If your IQ is over 150, it is a clarion call; without direct intervention, your career prospects are very poor. If you are the parent of a child with a D15IQ over 150, immediate and dramatic action is required. At present, realistic options for individual remediation are severely limited.
To provide perspective for readers, one in 261 people have IQs over 140 and one in 2,331 have IQs over 150. While the high IQ exclusion does not directly affect a large percentage of the population, the people it does affect, it affects profoundly. Because of the large population of western civiliztion, the absolute number in this group is not small. There are approximately 6.5 million people with an IQ over 140 and 729,000 people with an IQ over 150.
society is designed for stupid people. you and lanny's success is like coming first place in the special olympics that is social infrastructure. im choosing to opt out because my mind is more interesting to me than material things. oooo shinyy -
2018-06-14 at 12:11 PM UTCYo, bro.
Talkin' to yaself? lmrao -
2018-06-14 at 12:12 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:13 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:16 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:16 PM UTCfuk you ya fkn yo-yo
go play in some lava -
2018-06-14 at 12:27 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:31 PM UTCIDGAF
Yer still a yo-yo. -
2018-06-14 at 12:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Sick source, bro. Like I said, you are intellectually subnormal.
like there aren't mathematicians who use blogspot.
>source: Microsoft Word
>LOL FUCKIN IDIOT
use lanny as your source for philosopy though. you are pathetically stupid and absolutely grasping at straws. you could try to find fallacies in the article but sadly you don't have the capacity to. the best you can do is criticize a URL. -
2018-06-14 at 12:41 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:43 PM UTClmrao
intellectual yo-yos are funny -
2018-06-14 at 12:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla like there aren't mathematicians who use blogspot.
>source: Microsoft Word
>LOL FUCKIN IDIOT
If this paper was worth considering, it would be in a peer reviewed journal, not on a .blogspot.com post.
Is this why you are a B-grader? Have you been citing blogspot links to your professors?use lanny as your source for philosopy though.
Lanny and I disagree on basically everything in philosophy.you are pathetically stupid and absolutely grasping at straws. you could try to find fallacies in the article but sadly you don't have the capacity to. the best you can do is criticize a URL.
It's not my job to review a blogspot post. You are making excuses for being a glue sniffer because you cannot face your mental subnormality. -
2018-06-14 at 12:50 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:50 PM UTCWho's bringing the donuts?
-
2018-06-14 at 12:51 PM UTC
-
2018-06-14 at 12:57 PM UTCFk u yo-yo
Go walk a dog. -
2018-06-14 at 2:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla clearly this is how all independent research is done
Yeah, independent research is done because you don't want to admit that your life situation bears all the hallmarks of a loser.
No, it must be because you are a genius instead.
https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.30.3.133 -
2018-06-14 at 2:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Yeah, independent research is done because you don't want to admit that your life situation bears all the hallmarks of a loser.
No, it must be because you are a genius instead.
https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.30.3.133
when ur so stupid u think the only way someone can write something reasonable is thru a published paper
most scientific articles are full of methodological flaws too. but since you're putting human reason in an unnecessary seperation of PUBLISHED SO RLELAL or NOT PUBLISHED SO NOT RLELEAL EVEN IF THE PERSON IS RIGHT it shows you hardly understand the scientific process at all and that you're conflating it with corporate utilization of someones ideas.
your IQ is below 130 so i guess you wouldn't realize that highly intelligent people literally perceive the world through axioms of scientific process. clearly every good true idea anyone has ever had is in a journal, and every bad wrong idea is on a person's independent website. its not like people are discovering things constantly and keeping it to themselves.
so just continue sucking up everything you read thats framed to be authoritative because you cant actually think for yourself, and you especially cant refute anything that was in the link i posted because its above your level of comprehension tldr -
2018-06-14 at 2:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla when ur so stupid u think the only way someone can write something reasonable is thru a published paper
most scientific articles are full of methodological flaws too. but since you're putting human reason in an unnecessary seperation of PUBLISHED SO RLELAL or NOT PUBLISHED SO NOT RLELEAL EVEN IF THE PERSON IS RIGHT it shows you hardly understand the scientific process at all and that you're conflating it with corporate utilization of someones ideas.
your IQ is below 130 so i guess you wouldn't realize that highly intelligent people literally perceive the world through axioms of scientific process. clearly every good true idea anyone has ever had is in a journal, and every bad wrong idea is on a person's independent website. its not like people are discovering things constantly and keeping it to themselves.
so just continue sucking up everything you read thats framed to be authoritative because you cant actually think for yourself, and you especially cant refute anything that was in the link i posted because its above your level of comprehension tldr
Here have another actual, peer reviewed source that describes the specific type of moron you are:
http://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1999-15054-002 -
2018-06-14 at 2:29 PM UTCDamn bro remember when you wrote that huge bullshit wall of salad that you thought was good insults and Captain used his utterly worthless education in trolling to respond to the post seriously. then you guys went back and forth about hurrrr the source is blogspot even though people post paid articles on blogspot because fuck paywalls blablabla cringe for hours?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
