User Controls

Navigation

Niggas in Space > Oh the Humanities! > We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. ...
  7. 94
  8. 95
  9. 96
  10. 97
  11. 98
  12. 99
  13. ...
  14. 157
  15. 158
  16. 159
  17. 160

We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat

  1. 2018-09-26 at 12:45 AM UTC
    #1921
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Obbe It has to be what someone thinks the world should be… the world doesn't think it should be one way or another.

    The world doesn't think it is one way or another either.

  2. 2018-09-26 at 12:53 AM UTC
    #1922
    DontTellEm Black Hole
    Hopefully, New people will come along & we can show them the light beyond the tunnel.

    If they don't kill themselves first! Teeehehehehrehheeh! Oops! Simple faggot.
  3. 2018-09-26 at 1:37 AM UTC
    #1923
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Lanny
    The world doesn't think it is one way or another either.

    The truth doesn't need it to. The world is the way it is whether someone is thinking about it or not. The "way the world should be" exists only in imagination.
  4. 2018-09-26 at 1:43 AM UTC
    #1924
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Obbe The truth doesn't need it to. The world is the way it is whether someone is thinking about it or not.

    I agree, just as the world ought to be as it ought to be (this is literally a tautology), wether someone is thinking about it or not.
  5. 2018-09-26 at 2:18 AM UTC
    #1925
    vindicktive vinny Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny I agree, just as the world ought to be as it ought to be (this is literally a tautology), wether someone is thinking about it or not.

    the world ought to change its climate.
  6. 2018-09-26 at 4:41 AM UTC
    #1926
    Sevn Yung Blood [confab my linked clunch]
    Originally posted by Lanny —–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–
    Hash: SHA256



    You sounds really upset that other people don't enjoy sucking dickeating meat as you do.
    —–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

    No problem with eating meat, vegetables, or sucking dick. The beef is with OP’s Jehovah’s Witness style of meat shame. You wanna push anti meat, your gonna get a sausage back... pushing down your throat
  7. 2018-09-26 at 4:50 AM UTC
    #1927
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jim …Life sucks when you have four legs and no fingers. …

    If the animal in question has opposable thumbs, that helps.
  8. 2018-09-26 at 10:29 AM UTC
    #1928
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Lanny I agree, just as the world ought to be as it ought to be (this is literally a tautology), wether someone is thinking about it or not.

    The way the world ought to be is imaginary. Has nothing to do with the way the world is. Therefore has nothing to do with truth.
  9. 2018-09-26 at 5:15 PM UTC
    #1929
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Obbe The way the world ought to be is imaginary.

    Yes, you've said that many times now and you're as wrong now as you were when you first said it.
  10. 2018-09-26 at 6:18 PM UTC
    #1930
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Lanny
    Yes, you've said that many times now and you're as wrong now as you were when you first said it.

    I would accept that if you had a convincing argument instead of just repeating "actually you're wrong".
  11. 2018-09-26 at 6:21 PM UTC
    #1931
    RisiR † 29 Autism
    It's hard to convince a mentally deficient.
  12. 2018-09-26 at 6:27 PM UTC
    #1932
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by RisiR † It's hard to convince a mentally deficient.

    You live with your mom and contemplate suicide often and never stop complaining about anything.
  13. 2018-09-26 at 6:33 PM UTC
    #1933
    RisiR † 29 Autism
    No.
  14. 2018-09-26 at 8:46 PM UTC
    #1934
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
  15. 2018-09-27 at 1:20 AM UTC
    #1935
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Obbe I would accept that if you had a convincing argument instead of just repeating "actually you're wrong".

    Well there's not much of an argument to be made for a definition of a word, although I've already offered you one which you promptly ignored.
  16. 2018-09-27 at 10:32 AM UTC
    #1936
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I haven't ignored you, your definition doesn't make sense. The "way the world ought to be" is the way someone imagines the world should be. It doesn't exist anywhere outside of your imagination. Truth has nothing to do with it because truth is a matter of what is and what isn't, not what someone imagines. You keep repeating that isn't the case but you never explain why. You're just trolling, trying to get this thread to 2000 replies. If "the way the would ought to be" isn't imaginary, where is it?
  17. 2018-09-27 at 11:47 AM UTC
    #1937
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Lanny
    I've told you several times now that what I mean by moral facts is not facts about how someone imagines the world should be. So yes, without reason as you're repeatedly saying there is no truth value to something you're defining in such a way as to have no truth value and refusing to address my actual position.



    That's not my definition of immoral lol, you would know that if you read pretty much any of my posts in this thread.

    That's your problem. You make up definitions and then react as if everyone else is wrong and only you know the truth. That's what makes you sad and funny.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. 2018-09-27 at 9:18 PM UTC
    #1938
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    His "moral statements" may be logically consistent within the moral framework he has chosen to adhere to, but they are not statements of truth because they are not statements about how the world really is or how it really isn't. Nobody has any obligation to recognize or accept someone's moral framework or their conclusions.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. 2018-09-28 at 8:37 AM UTC
    #1939
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Obbe I haven't ignored you, your definition doesn't make sense.

    What about it doesn't make sense?

    The "way the world ought to be" is the way someone imagines the world should be.

    On the contrary, that's not what "the way the world ought to be" is. Even if you think I've picked some strange definition for morality or ought statements (although I think it's really a pretty standard understanding that family of phrases), you're failing to understand what is meant when I speak about how the world ought to be if you think I'm talking about opinions.
  20. 2018-09-28 at 8:41 AM UTC
    #1940
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker That's your problem. You make up definitions and then react as if everyone else is wrong and only you know the truth. That's what makes you sad and funny.

    Hey, do remember that one thread where you tried to say morality and ethics have nothing to do with each other and then I posted multiple major dictionaries what said the opposite of that? So basically we found the closest thing to objective proof of that it's in fact you who's pulling definitions for words out of your ass as suits you?

    Do you remember the part where that thread is this very thread you're posting in right now?

    Because I remember that.

    LMRAO!
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. ...
  7. 94
  8. 95
  9. 96
  10. 97
  11. 98
  12. 99
  13. ...
  14. 157
  15. 158
  16. 159
  17. 160
Jump to Top