User Controls

We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat

  1. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    then mincing should do it.
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by benny vader then mincing should do it.

    How come you slanty-eyed orientals have this thing for mincing?
  3. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by benny vader cant you just use a meat tenderizer ???

    im too busy using it to tenderize zanicks colon.
  4. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by -SpectraL How come you slanty-eyed orientals have this thing for mincing?

    we have more cultured, civilized, non pointy teeth and we prefer less work at the dining table, feeding little chunks of well prepared food into our mouth with chopped sticks

    as opposed to white mens way of barbaric living and conducting cuisine [kitchen] work of slicing and chopping large cut of meats ... on the dining table.

    with an array of cutleries.
  5. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by infinityshock im too busy using it to tenderize zanicks colon.

    welcome back.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by benny vader we have more cultured, civilized, non pointy teeth and we prefer less work at the dining table, feeding little chunks of well prepared food into our mouth with chopped sticks

    as opposed to white mens way of barbaric living and conducting cuisine [kitchen] work of slicing and chopping large cut of meats … on the dining table.

    with an array of cutleries.

    I see. Makes sense.

    (can't believe you didn't say cuntleries, you're slipping, kid)
  7. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Zanick Bump to remind new posters of their increasing moral obligation

    Fuck you and your stupid thread.
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Our old friend Speedy, the avatar thief.
  9. I win
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by mmQ I think so but i don't think they do it because they want them to suffer or be tortured. Could you come up with an argument for a case in which baby torture is right or ok?

    Some religions believe it is morally correct to circumcise baby boys or girls, this is a form of baby torture these groups of people believe is right or ok. (I don't agree with them.)

    Do you believe there are any objective moral truths?
  11. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Obbe Some religions believe it is morally correct to circumcise baby boys or girls, this is a form of baby torture these groups of people believe is right or ok. (I don't agree with them.)

    Do you believe there are any objective moral truths?

    the part where they suck on the babys tiny dick after they slice it off...how does that get morally justified...
  12. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    cheaper than a wet-wipe
  13. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by aldra cheaper than a wet-wipe

    but probably not as tasty.
  14. jedis live rent free inside people's heads around here
  15. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Our old friend Speedy, the avatar thief.
  16. Soyboy African Astronaut [relevantly rival my dehydroretinol]
    Originally posted by mmQ I'm clearly no philosophy major and maybe this is some s00per basic stuff but i was more or less just curious how it works if you feel we're morally obligated to do a thing, then are we also inherently morally obligated to try to convince others to do that thing even in the face of heavy opposition, and where does the line get drawn? Maybe this is something you talk about on day 1 of class I don't know.

    Depends on the moral system. For instance Christian morality is clear on the matter, you must drop all worldly things to follow Jesus, follow passivism and reject worldly things, and spreading the morality is the most important thing. Any deviation from those things is some form of sin, and that is why Christians have to do penance, even when they have done nothing wrong.

    Christianity was so successful because it has clear rules and a method of propagating itself.

    Zanick doesn't have a moral system, it's just a bunch of weird neuroses.

    Originally posted by Zanick Nah, that's something they've argued for centuries

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Obbe Some religions believe it is morally correct to circumcise baby boys or girls, this is a form of baby torture these groups of people believe is right or ok. (I don't agree with them.)

    Do you believe there are any objective moral truths?

    Morals can never be objective. They are set by each individual for the self.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Morals can never be objective. They are set by each individual for the self.

    I think so too. Morality is subjective, but I also think an average person is greatly influenced by their culture/social pressures. As well as a variety of other influences. A person might think theft is wrong their whole lives, up until they are hungry enough to steal some bread.
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by infinityshock the part where they suck on the babys tiny dick after they slice it off…how does that get morally justified…

    You would have to ask them.
  20. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Obbe You would have to ask them.

    i prefer to have no association with pedophiles
Jump to Top