User Controls
What's the first sexual thing you saw growing up?
-
2017-10-07 at 3:31 AM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 3:32 AM UTCreal sick conversation. clearly it's to protect children from perveted old men.
Although I believe in Tennessee it was legal to marry 14 and a cousin at one time. hopefuly those laws aren't still on the books. -
2017-10-07 at 4:04 AM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 12:09 PM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Dargo Hi. Yeah.. Early teens is one thing but I'm pretty sure fucking 5 year olds and the like has always been a no-no.
did the bible ever said no ???
and what say the constitution ????
do you have an amendment that effectively said 'thy shalt not fuckth children' ???
no, no and no. -
2017-10-07 at 4:17 PM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 4:20 PM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 6:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader did the bible ever said no ???
and what say the constitution ????
do you have an amendment that effectively said 'thy shalt not fuckth children' ???
no, no and no.
Nigga, the bible? The bible says that eating seafood is wrong and so is wearing clothing of mixed fibers. -
2017-10-07 at 6:45 PM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 8:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery Nigga, the bible? The bible says that eating seafood is wrong and so is wearing clothing of mixed fibers.
exactly ....
if the bible would address something as mundane as that then surely something as monsterous [according to the society today] as fucking a child would be included in the 10 commandments and numerous books would be dedicated to highlight and reiterate the grave sins of pedophilia.
that did not happen becos pedophilia was then ... an accepted way of life. -
2017-10-07 at 9:23 PM UTCBut the bible is a load of bollocks so your beautifully crafted argument(sic) is moot.
. -
2017-10-07 at 9:27 PM UTC
-
2017-10-07 at 9:34 PM UTCThe Mosaic Law, outlined in the Bible, is a set of laws the Israelites had to obey. Once they had broken the covenant - their contract with God - those laws became null and void. So, those laws are not only obsolete, they are invalid in our time. They never applied to any of us.
Teh moar u now!! -
2017-10-07 at 10:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader exactly ….
if the bible would address something as mundane as that then surely something as monsterous [according to the society today] as fucking a child would be included in the 10 commandments and numerous books would be dedicated to highlight and reiterate the grave sins of pedophilia.
that did not happen becos pedophilia was then … an accepted way of life.
pedophilia didnt exist until modern juden psychology invented it.
way-back-when puberty was adulthood. kiddy-diddlers didnt exist because:
1. there was less mental instability than there is now. the enticement to be anti-social by diddling kiddies wasnt as pronounced as it is nowadays. that...and when a male/female was ripe, as in puberty, they were married off and never in a circumstance to become a diddled kiddy.
2. mommy was with the kiddys 24-7, preventing any kiddy-diddlers from coming around
6. if a kiddy-diddler DID manage to come around, mommy and/or daddy AND the other immediate relatives were legally justified in assuring the kiddy-diddler was physically incapable of diddling any more kiddys ever again.
5. mommy had no choice but to give up the orifices to daddy if daddy had that little gleam in his eye. there was literally no such thing as 'spousal rape'...another stupid ass modern invention. that being the case, daddy or crazy uncle billy never had to be concerned about having that little itch in his loins scratched. in modern times daddy and the crazy uncles might not ever get his little itch scratched because mommy doesnt know how to behave, leaving daddy no other choice than to jump on the kiddie-diddly train.
12. yes, there were some intra-familial kiddy-diddlers, such as that crazy uncle, or the loony cousin several-times-removed, but that was kept 'in the family' and either quietly ignored, or the relatives resolved the issue amongst themselves. additionally, they didnt have the god forsaken juden-induced victimization-promotion like nowadays so when there was kiddy-diddling going on, the kiddy grew up as a normal adult without that fake ADHD bullshit and perpetual 'boo hoo...i was molested. everybody tell me how sorry for me they are and give me nice stuffs just because.' -
2017-10-07 at 10:20 PM UTCIn the good old days, they'd just drag the child molester out behind the shed and put a couple of rounds in him, or just hang him from the nearest tree. Quick shallow grave. No more problem. Simple. Easy. Way too much fuss and bother put into molesters these days.
-
2017-10-08 at 1:44 AM UTC
-
2017-10-08 at 3:33 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-10-08 at 4:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock 12. yes, there were some intra-familial kiddy-diddlers, such as that crazy uncle, or the loony cousin several-times-removed, but that was kept 'in the family' and either quietly ignored, or the relatives resolved the issue amongst themselves. additionally, they didnt have the god forsaken juden-induced victimization-promotion like nowadays so when there was kiddy-diddling going on, the kiddy grew up as a normal adult without that fake ADHD bullshit and perpetual 'boo hoo…i was molested. everybody tell me how sorry for me they are and give me nice stuffs just because.'
thanks.
this exactly what i was saying.
also, in the long past there were abundance of orphaned and abandoned and it was the norm in those days to exploit these childrens in any means possible .....
the less fortunate ones were always made to work in slave-like condition in factories. -
2017-10-08 at 4:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL In the good old days, they'd just drag the child molester out behind the shed and put a couple of rounds in him, or just hang him from the nearest tree. Quick shallow grave. No more problem. Simple. Easy. Way too much fuss and bother put into molesters these days.
nein.Historically, child marriage was common around the world, the average life expectancy did not exceed 50 years old so it was seen as a better way to reproduce through child marriage.[20] The practice began to be questioned in the 20th century, with the age of individuals' first marriage increasing in many countries and most countries increasing the minimum marriage age
In ancient and medieval societies, it was common for girls to be betrothed at or even before puberty.[21][22] As Friedman claims, "arranging and contracting the marriage of a young girl were the undisputed prerogatives of her father in ancient Israel." Most girls were married before the age of 15, often at the start of their puberty.[23] In the Middle Ages the age at marriage seems to have been around puberty throughout the jedi world.[24]
Ruth Lamdan writes: “The numerous references to child marriage in the 16th- century Responsa literature and other sources, shows that child marriage was so common, it was virtually the norm. In this context, it is important to remember that in halakha, the term ‘minor’ refers to a girl under twelve years and a day. A girl aged twelve and a half was already considered an adult in all respects.”[25]
In Ancient Greece, early marriage and motherhood for girls was encouraged.[26] Even boys were expected to marry in their teens. Early marriages and teenage motherhood was typical. In Ancient Rome, girls married above the age of 12 and boys above 14.[27] In the Middle Ages, under English civil laws that were derived from Roman laws, marriages before the age of 16 were common. In Imperial China, child marriage was the norm.[28][29] -
2017-10-08 at 4:55 AM UTCWhen you have to use the logic of people from centuries and millennia ago to justify your degeneracy. We're supposed to evolve, not regress. Maybe we should wear loincloths and paint on cave walls too? Speak in grunts?
Besides the fact that everything you've posted is only about those in puberty and beyond, and it's pretty clear you don't discriminate and would fuck a 9-year-old.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
