User Controls
Why can't non whites use stores correctly
-
2020-02-22 at 1:05 AM UTC
-
2020-02-22 at 3:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Mauser bolt. All operation on the 1903 springfield is more or less identical to the Gewehr 98. The entire intent of the springfield was to copy the Mauser. No original American innovation used there.
I just laid out how it was inspired by two different weapons. Paul Mauser owned the patent on stripper clips and the type of extractor used on his bolts. Springfield infringed on those patents when they released the 03 Rifle. The Springfield isn’t a copy of the Mauser 98. The Springfield’s two piece firing pin is not Mauser like at all. It is a bolt action rifle that has a lot of similarities, but every bolt action rifle has similarities to the Mauser 98. Just like every semi automatic pistol has similarities to the Colt Model 1909 Automatic developed by John Browning for Colt. -
2020-02-22 at 3:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker I just laid out how it was inspired by two different weapons. Paul Mauser owned the patent on stripper clips and the type of extractor used on his bolts. Springfield infringed on those patents when they released the 03 Rifle. The Springfield isn’t a copy of the Mauser 98. The Springfield’s two piece firing pin is not Mauser like at all. It is a bolt action rifle that has a lot of similarities, but every bolt action rifle has similarities to the Mauser 98. Just like every semi automatic pistol has similarities to the Colt Model 1909 Automatic developed by John Browning for Colt.
Not true. Enfields don't share anything in common with mausers. Beyond the fact that they're bolt action. When they designed the Springfield, they had a mauser infront of them. They did not do that when they designed the enfield. Hence two different rifles.
Originally posted by Odilo Globocnik youre drunk, go back to bed. you have no idea what your splattering all over the screen
m14. jesus christ.
Sorry, marksmen in Afghanistan use Mk 14 EBR rifles. Why? Because the AR15s are designed to be more of a replacement for a submachinegun than anything. The M14 was originally intended to replace the SMG, the carbine, the BAR, and the Garand. It failed to replace the SMG or the carbine, so they introduced the M16. The M16 failed to replace the BAR or the Garand, so they re-introduced the M14 as the Mk 14 EBR in 2002. Now they only have two weapons to fulfill all the roles that they needed four weapons to fill in WWII. -
2020-02-22 at 7:04 AM UTC
-
2020-02-22 at 7:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Not true. Enfields don't share anything in common with mausers. Beyond the fact that they're bolt action. When they designed the Springfield, they had a mauser infront of them. They did not do that when they designed the enfield. Hence two different rifles.
Sorry, marksmen in Afghanistan use Mk 14 EBR rifles. Why? Because the AR15s are designed to be more of a replacement for a submachinegun than anything. The M14 was originally intended to replace the SMG, the carbine, the BAR, and the Garand. It failed to replace the SMG or the carbine, so they introduced the M16. The M16 failed to replace the BAR or the Garand, so they re-introduced the M14 as the Mk 14 EBR in 2002. Now they only have two weapons to fulfill all the roles that they needed four weapons to fill in WWII.
I get it now. You hate America and facts. Good to know.
BTW AR15's are meant to be hunting rifles.
-
2020-02-22 at 12:01 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-02-22 at 12:26 PM UTCBring an assault rifle next time and show them who's boss.
-
2020-02-22 at 1:15 PM UTCok, you stupid faggots. listen here.
the AR platform is a gun meant to be used to attack and kill other human beings. and it is the best at it.
defense is for FAGGOTS. once you're on the defense you've already lost. defenders are fags.
victory only comes from attack. period.
we don't have a right to self defense. we have a right to FIGHT. we have a god given right to ATTACK.
and that's what the AR-15 platform rifle is perfect for. ATTACKING AND KILLING HUMAN BEINGS. it's a combat weapon. that's why it's beautiful to me. not because it's some pussy self defense piece of shit. but because it's a finely tuned instrument of massacre.
anyone who picks up a gun to 'defend' themselves is a scared little baby.
fuck the faggot constitution i'd rip it up and piss on it. fuck the US government, fuck self defense, heil hitler, i have a right to attack others. all fucking niggers must fucking hang. -
2020-02-22 at 2:56 PM UTCGuns are for faggots who can't win a fight with their fists
-
2020-02-22 at 3:06 PM UTCI use only well reasoned arguments to defend myself.
-
2020-02-22 at 3:10 PM UTC
-
2020-02-22 at 6:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The Military doesn't use AR-15's it is a civilian rifle absolutely no different than this.
its made to look like m16 that the US military used to shoot vietnamese childrens so that soft boys who were too soft and too scarred to be in the US military get to wield and play with military-looking bang-bang just like real soldiers do.
their homologs. -
2020-02-22 at 6:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by snab_snib ok, you stupid faggots. listen here.
the AR platform is a gun meant to be used to attack and kill other human beings. and it is the best at it.
defense is for FAGGOTS. once you're on the defense you've already lost. defenders are fags.
victory only comes from attack. period.
we don't have a right to self defense. we have a right to FIGHT. we have a god given right to ATTACK.
and that's what the AR-15 platform rifle is perfect for. ATTACKING AND KILLING HUMAN BEINGS. it's a combat weapon. that's why it's beautiful to me. not because it's some pussy self defense piece of shit. but because it's a finely tuned instrument of massacre.
anyone who picks up a gun to 'defend' themselves is a scared little baby.
fuck the faggot constitution i'd rip it up and piss on it. fuck the US government, fuck self defense, heil hitler, i have a right to attack others. all fucking niggers must fucking hang.
if you need to attack then you already lose.
real winners win by having others capitulate before they even need to attack.
attacking is only for beasts and negrows. -
2020-02-22 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny its made to look like m16 that the US military used to shoot vietnamese childrens so that soft boys who were too soft and too scarred to be in the US military get to wield and play with military-looking bang-bang just like real soldiers do.
their homologs.
The AR-15 was introduced in 1959 the M16 was not a thing until 1964. You are too stupid to play in my sandbox. No go away before I mistake you for a turd and bury you. -
2020-02-22 at 6:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The AR-15 was introduced in 1959 the M16 was not a thing until 1964. You are too stupid to play in my sandbox. No go away before I mistake you for a turd and bury you.
In 1959, ArmaLite sold its rights to the AR-15 to Colt due to financial difficulties, and limitations in terms of manpower and production capacity.[6] After modifications (most notably, the charging handle was re-located from under the carrying handle like AR-10 to the rear of the receiver),[7] Colt rebranded it the Colt 601, however it still carried the Armalite markings due to contractual obligations to Armalite/Fairchild Aircraft Co. Colt marketed the redesigned rifle to various military services around the world and it was subsequently adopted by the U.S. military as the M16 rifle, which went into production in March 1964.[5][8]
yes, as military weapons first and foremost as stated in the bolded texts.
civilian market was an afterthought. -
2020-02-22 at 6:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yes, as military weapons first and foremost as stated in the bolded texts.
civilian market was an afterthought.
You are full of wrong even when you are actually trying to be right.
1954: The ArmaLite Company is Founded
1954-1956: ArmaLite Begins Designing Rifles In 1954, the first weapon was the AR-5. A bolt-action rifle with a .22 Hornet round was developed as a survival rifle for the flight crew in the U.S. Airforce.
1955: The U.S. Army Seeks a Replacement Rifle Armalite submits the AR 10 but does not get a contract.
1956-1959: International Licensing Agreement For The AR-10
1959: ArmaLite Sells the AR-15 Design to Colt who begins production for civilian sales as a hunting rifle.
1961: Eugene Stoner leaves Armalite and joins Colt as a consultant.
1963: The M-16 is born but not adopted by the US military who refuses to give up the inferior M14 for various reasons.
1965: The M-16 Becomes the Primary Service Rifle. Despite the continued resistance to the M16 production problems with the M-14 forced the hands of Robert McNamara, the U.S. Secretary of Defense. The United States needed a rifle that could be used in all four branches of service. The M-16 would be this weapon. -
2020-02-22 at 7:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker I get it now. You hate America and facts. Good to know.
BTW AR15's are meant to be hunting rifles.
Boo hoo, I called an M16 for an AR-15 by mistake. My bad, AR-15s are semi only.
You know exactly what I meant. The AR-15 is a hunting rifle adaption of a military rifle. And this makes me wrong.
Doesn't change the fact that US military adopted the Mk 14 EBR in 2002 because the M4/M16s were insufficient for the designated marksman role. -
2020-02-22 at 7:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker You are full of wrong even when you are actually trying to be right.
1954: The ArmaLite Company is Founded
1954-1956: ArmaLite Begins Designing Rifles In 1954, the first weapon was the AR-5. A bolt-action rifle with a .22 Hornet round was developed as a survival rifle for the flight crew in the U.S. Airforce.
1955: The U.S. Army Seeks a Replacement Rifle Armalite submits the AR 10 but does not get a contract.
1956-1959: International Licensing Agreement For The AR-10
1959: ArmaLite Sells the AR-15 Design to Colt who begins production for civilian sales as a hunting rifle.
1961: Eugene Stoner leaves Armalite and joins Colt as a consultant.
1963: The M-16 is born but not adopted by the US military who refuses to give up the inferior M14 for various reasons.
1965: The M-16 Becomes the Primary Service Rifle. Despite the continued resistance to the M16 production problems with the M-14 forced the hands of Robert McNamara, the U.S. Secretary of Defense. The United States needed a rifle that could be used in all four branches of service. The M-16 would be this weapon.
no, your source is wrong.In 1958, ArmaLite submitted ten AR-15s and one hundred 25-round magazines for CONARC testing.[7] The tests found that a 5- to 7-man team armed with AR-15s has the same firepower as 11-man team armed with M14s.[36] That soldiers armed with AR-15s could carry three times more ammunition as those armed with M14s (649 rounds vs 220 rounds).[37] And, that the AR-15 was three times more reliable than the M14 rifle.[7] However, General Maxwell Taylor, then Army Chief of Staff, "vetoed" the AR-15 in favor of the M14.[7] In 1959, ArmaLite now frustrated with the lack of results and suffering ongoing financial difficulties, sold its rights to the AR-10 and AR-15 to Colt.[6]
main purpose was/is military weapon.Colt started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 in 1964.[3]
tell me my sauce is lying.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-22 at 7:41 PM UTC
-
2020-02-22 at 9:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam Boo hoo, I called an M16 for an AR-15 by mistake. My bad, AR-15s are semi only.
You know exactly what I meant. The AR-15 is a hunting rifle adaption of a military rifle. And this makes me wrong.
Doesn't change the fact that US military adopted the Mk 14 EBR in 2002 because the M4/M16s were insufficient for the designated marksman role.
No, what makes you wrong is the the that the M 16 was an adaption of a hunting rifle called the AR 15 not the other way around. As I have already documented above.
See: https://niggasin.space/thread/51086?p=2#post-997896
