User Controls
Kobe Bryant killed in helicopter crash
-
2020-01-28 at 1:18 PM UTCObama's mom was assassinated by Republicans
-
2020-01-28 at 1:19 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 1:22 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 1:50 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 2:10 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 2:12 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 2:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Good doesn't either, human constructs etc. Perspective is everything.
If good and evil don't exist, then right and wrong don't exist either. And if right and wrong don't exist, that is a very impractical system. I mean, who answers three to two plus two and feels good about it? -
2020-01-28 at 2:22 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 2:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL If good and evil don't exist, then right and wrong don't exist either. And if right and wrong don't exist, that is a very impractical system. I mean, who answers three to two plus two and feels good about it?
Yeah but what if evil is right and good is wrong?
We're just told things differently. -
2020-01-28 at 2:36 PM UTC
-
2020-01-28 at 2:37 PM UTCEverything is just brain chemistry and how your body reacts to thing. Morality is based off of your natural instincts. Humans are hunter gatherers where losing a member of your tribe means less food so we Inherited the trait of feeling guilt and wanting to punish those who kill which after thousands of years and technology easy lives became cultural values and beliefs we call morality
-
2020-01-28 at 2:39 PM UTCAnts don't care what humans see as good and evil, right and wrong...again perspective.
-
2020-01-28 at 2:40 PM UTCwonder what an ant's social media would look like
-
2020-01-28 at 2:42 PM UTCNude selfies
-
2020-01-28 at 2:42 PM UTCYeah there was no morality BS millenia ago. If we wanted something, we just picked up a rock and bashed some cunt's brains in and took it.
If we a saw a "pretty" girl, we just raped her real horrorshow. -
2020-01-28 at 2:49 PM UTC"Good" is the result of something which is constructive and beneficial, such as progress and enlightenment. Therefore "bad" must be the opposite, things which are not constructive and not beneficial, such as death and suffering.
-
2020-01-28 at 2:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL "Good" is the result of something which is constructive and beneficial, such as progress and enlightenment. Therefore "bad" must be the opposite, things which are not constructive and not beneficial, such as death and suffering.
Again perspective, what one person sees as good/beneficial another might not.
Example.
Soldier A: It's good that Soldier B got his leg blown off, now he is less of a threat
Soldier B: It's bad that I had my leg blown off, now Soldier A can slaughter me. -
2020-01-28 at 3:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Everything is just brain chemistry and how your body reacts to thing. Morality is based off of your natural instincts. Humans are hunter gatherers where losing a member of your tribe means less food so we Inherited the trait of feeling guilt and wanting to punish those who kill which after thousands of years and technology easy lives became cultural values and beliefs we call morality
Makes no sense retard.
Lots of animals have collaborative dynamics where killing inside the community would be a disadvantage, yet exhibit no moral behaviour or consideration.
Conversely we see pseudo-social morality such as territorial behaviour in animals where there is no cooperative structure at all.
Then it's just trivially false by just looking at the evolution of morality in the past 6000 years. If you are not retarded it is obvious their sense of morality is virtually nothing like ours even in the last 30 years. There's just not enough time for those changes to be genetic. What they are, and what is interesting and complicated and difficult to study rather than reductionist retardation by someone who barely grasps the subject, are changes from cultural evolution.
The problem to be solved is finding the junction between the two. Saying it's "just brain chemistry" is like explaining flight with "it's just air physics". -
2020-01-28 at 3:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again perspective, what one person sees as good/beneficial another might not.
Example.
Soldier A: It's good that Soldier B got his leg blown off, now he is less of a threat
Soldier B: It's bad that I had my leg blown off, now Soldier A can slaughter me.
Not true, because in both cases there is a beneficial and a non-beneficial outcome. The only question is the weight of each. Some evils are greater than other evils, and some good is greater than other good. Has nothing to do with perspective, as something that is beneficial is always good, and something not beneficial is always bad. -
2020-01-28 at 3:04 PM UTCHamsters sometimes eat their kids if they feel threatened. That doesn't really make much sense either.