User Controls
jedis unite behind sick fuck who beat and burned goy child
-
2019-10-07 at 2:20 AM UTC
-
2019-10-07 at 2:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo So you and the jewish kabbaal abuse goy children daily then render them impotent by overexposure to radiation? That's kind of rude and I wish something could be done about it
Ain’t nothing going to be done about it, cause they let this Catholic girl join their gang. Yeah I said gang, ya hear? -
2019-10-07 at 2:42 AM UTC
-
2019-10-07 at 4:49 AM UTC
-
2019-10-07 at 12:28 PM UTCMRI could not replace xray in any way. Totally different concept.
-
2019-10-07 at 12:36 PM UTCDon't the new MRI machines all have CAT scanners attached.
Throw in some positrons and x-rays by themselves are well obsolete -
2019-10-07 at 12:53 PM UTCNo, they don’t. My BFF runs the cardiac CT/MRI dept. at a large hospital. The machines use two different imaging modalities. CT scans us X radiation, whereas MRI uses high powered magnets to send a signal into the body. The cells within the target area react to the magnetic field, and send back a signal that creates the images.
MRI is more for tissue, vessels, and organs. It is not used to image bones. There will probably always be a need for both. But who knows? The field has changed so much since I started in the 80s.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-10-07 at 1:32 PM UTCI've had all three and they look vastly different on the screen. Neat hearing the actual difference tho.
-
2019-10-07 at 8:09 PM UTCMRIs aren't as effective without the gadolinium injection. It unfortunately has side effects.
-
2019-10-07 at 8:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz MRIs aren't as effective without the gadolinium injection. It unfortunately has side effects.
Don’t act like you know shit about anything. Gadolinium has few to NO side effects. I’ve had it probably 6 times and had 0 side effects.
Stick to talking conspiracy theories and leave the science to those who know. -
2019-10-07 at 8:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Don’t act like you know shit about anything. Gadolinium has few to NO side effects. I’ve had it probably 6 times and had 0 side effects.
Stick to talking conspiracy theories and leave the science to those who know.
Isn't it mostly just people who are allergic that have issues? -
2019-10-07 at 8:31 PM UTCIt has a low instance of allergic reactions. Now the “dye” that is used in general radiography and CT has higher instances of allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. The patients are screened thoroughly before they are given the “dye”.
I put dye in quotes because that’s the layman’s terms. It’s actually called contrast, more specifically omnipaque. -
2019-10-07 at 8:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Don’t act like you know shit about anything. Gadolinium has few to NO side effects. I’ve had it probably 6 times and had 0 side effects.
Stick to talking conspiracy theories and leave the science to those who know.
Then why do you suppose a lot of labs stopped using it? It does have side effects. Even if they aren't common, they are common enough for labs to stop using in due to risk of being sued.
I win. You lose. When you fart dust comes out of your ass, your brain doesn't work anymore and you do not understand science. -
2019-10-07 at 9:02 PM UTCWhat MRI suits stopped using it? It’s only bad if the person has compromised kidney function, and there is a screening process used.
-
2019-10-07 at 9:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist What MRI suits stopped using it? It’s only bad if the person has compromised kidney function, and there is a screening process used.
It is believed therefore that clinical toxicity of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs[38]) in humans will depend on the strength of the chelating agent; however this research is still not complete.[when?] About a dozen different Gd-chelated agents have been approved as MRI contrast agents around the world.
Similar but not identical symptoms to NSF may occur in subjects with normal or near-normal renal function within hours to 2 months following the administration of GBCAs; the name "gadolinium deposition disease" (GDD) has been proposed for this condition, which occurs in the absence of pre-existent disease or subsequently developed disease of an alternate known process. A 2016 study reported numerous anecdotal cases of GDD
So, no, it does not require pre-existing compromised kidney function to be toxic.
More research needed, but apparently it was enough to have some of the labs stop using it.
Anyway this thread is about how you and §m£ÂgØL defend j/ewish child abusers, not your misinterpretation of facts regarding contrasting agents. -
2019-10-07 at 9:30 PM UTC
Are you trolling or are you truly this stupid? -
2019-10-07 at 9:38 PM UTC
Before any MRI scan, you will be asked a number of questions about your medical history, and any implants you might have, to make sure that you will not be at risk from the strong magnetic fields of the scanner. You will also be asked about conditions that might mean a gadolinium injection would not be recommended (e.g. pregnancy, previous allergic reaction, severe kidney disease). If you have any of these conditions, then you will not be given gadolinium, but if there is no condition preventing injection, you might be asked to sign a consent form in case gadolinium is required.
You really are dense.
Here’s the article;
https://www.insideradiology.com.au/gadolinium-contrast-medium/
Talk about what you know. Insanity, mind control, autism, andddd.......well that about sums it up. -
2019-10-07 at 9:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist You really are dense.
Here’s the article;
https://www.insideradiology.com.au/gadolinium-contrast-medium/
Talk about what you know. Insanity, mind control, autism, andddd…….well that about sums it up.Similar but not identical symptoms to NSF may occur in subjects with normal or near-normal renal function within hours to 2 months following the administration of GBCAs; the name "gadolinium deposition disease" (GDD) has been proposed for this condition, which occurs in the absence of pre-existent disease or subsequently developed disease of an alternate known process. A 2016 study reported numerous anecdotal cases of GDD
See the bold part. Normal or near normal. Does not require kidney problems. That's the reason they don't automatically use it in some labs anymore. Still used of course, as I said in my first post in this thread, it's effective as a contrasting agent, but has side effects.
EDIT: Now you'll say GDD doesn't exist or that it requires kidney problems, ignoring the bold part. -
2019-10-07 at 10:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz See the bold part. Normal or near normal. Does not require kidney problems. That's the reason they don't automatically use it in some labs anymore. Still used of course, as I said in my first post in this thread, it's effective as a contrasting agent, but has side effects.
EDIT: Now you'll say GDD doesn't exist or that it requires kidney problems, ignoring the bold part.
Cite your source. Yanno, for context. -
2019-10-07 at 10:16 PM UTCjediw git dem new titty's yet YO!
