User Controls
What posters did you have on your walls as a teenager?
-
2019-03-26 at 10:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I agree with you. I never once said that another person without children would not be against a pedo.
I only made an observation that the pedo sympathizers I see on here are childless. Am I wrong?
But me saying that obviously struck a chord because I then became the person who said that childless people cannot sympathize with abused children.
Back peddling is also a sign of NPD.
Originally posted by gadzooks Under any conceivable eugenics regime, I would always wind up among the preserved.
Drug addicts do not tend to fall into the category of those that should be preserved. No matter if you say it isn't an addiction, they would automatically consider you a drug abuser, if not an addict. Leftists also have differences in their brains to people on the right, and unfortunately, they would probably consider you a radical as well as a drug abuser.
I can actually boast literal perfection.
Well, except for the being too tall and thus blocking the screen in movie theaters scenario.
I'll be among the first hauled off to the chambers if they use that as a criterion.
> tfw too tall to be an ubermensch -
2019-03-26 at 10:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I agree with you. I never once said that another person without children would not be against a pedo.
I only made an observation that the pedo sympathizers I see on here are childless. Am I wrong?
But me saying that obviously struck a chord because I then became the person who said that childless people cannot sympathize with abused children.
Well, Vinny sometimes (rather disturbingly) says that pedos that have children are being self-sufficient.
(Trust me, that thought thoroughly nauseates me too).
In fact, I think we can separate out parent-child molestation as encompassing two separate, both truly heinous crimes. A parent's one job is to protect their children, so to abuse that trust in order to commit a pedophilic act...
That's like a double whammy. -
2019-03-26 at 10:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by jedi_darryl Oh man where do I even start?
-Jadakiss
-styles p
-Jayz rockafeller center
-Baby spice from the spice girls
-michael jordan
-kobe
-steve nash
-allen iverson
-busta rhymes
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-cat
-dog
-that other girl from spice girls(redhead)forgot her name
-pamela anderson
I switch posters based on my moods. The limit was 7. I shared a room with my 2 brothers. My big brother was a bully back then so he was like the headmaster of the room. So if he wanted to switch sides we be like yeah ok lets do this. :)
It was really exciting.
This thread got so badly derailed that I was legitimately confused by this post for like a minute.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-26 at 10:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I’m saying NO parent worth a hill of beans would be a pedo sympathizer.
Just gotta quote that real quick. I disagree with the 'pedo sympathizers' that have kids, but that doesn't mean they're bad parents. I think they're too soft, and cucked out/overly sympathetic, but most of them probably take care of their kids. A lot of them, since they're liberals, also have a pretty good career going and can afford to raise their kids in a good neighborhood, feed and clothe them well, etc.
Technolojizz, in case you were wondering, I am not looking to get a reply from you, merely pointing out that you have a serious case of NPD to anyone that may "debate" with you. Your text is good for educational purposes, so I may quote it from time to time. -
2019-03-26 at 10:50 PM UTCI mean, basically everything is okay as long it doesn't directly hurt me.
Does that mean I have NPD? No. My sister, however, does.
The difference is that I don't believe anyone else is better or worse than me. She thinks she is better than people and feeds off of it. -
2019-03-26 at 10:57 PM UTC
-
2019-03-26 at 11 PM UTCAll pedo whisperers, please step forward.
-
2019-03-26 at 11:01 PM UTCAlso, the term "pedo sympathizer" is entirely too loosely (or, really, not at all) defined.
Does it make me a pedo sympathizer if I would have a problem with my son or daughter being raped repeatedly in prison because they turned out to be a practicing pedophile? Then, by all means, call me a pedo sympathizer, because I guess I am one.
But so are you, Technologist, when you said you would try to get your son/daughter the help they need if you discovered they had the same tendencies, and that you would stand by them for moral support while they endure their criminal sentence.
Really, it's my ultimate contention that LITERALLY EVERYONE would be a so-called "pedo sympathizer" under the right conditions.
If you could sit back and watch, and even enjoy, your own adult son or daughter being sexually abused as some form of "justice", I would accuse you of either being disingenuous, or possibly a psychopath. Either way, you're worse than the remorseful pedophile who seeks to cure their ailment if you ever take actual pleasure in the sexual assault/abuse of another human being.
Now, if "pedo sympathizer" means you actually believe we should be trying to legalize or even de-stigmatize pedophilia, you're an absolute wackjob, quite frankly.
I can't believe I have to repeat this for like the dozenth time in this thread, but, at least in my opinion, RAPE / SEXUAL ASSAULT / SEXUAL ABUSE / and NON-CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE BETWEEN ADULT AND MINOR, are all morally wrong.
You (whomever) have the right to be a rape relativist and take pleasure in another person's sexual assault, but I legitimately see absolutely zero difference between you and the person you condemn. -
2019-03-26 at 11:04 PM UTCSkin of my skin, bones of my bones, blood of my blood, sweat of my sweat.
-
2019-03-26 at 11:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers Drug addicts do not tend to fall into the category of those that should be preserved. No matter if you say it isn't an addiction, they would automatically consider you a drug abuser, if not an addict.
I was being facetious. Ask fifty people for a eugenics plan and you will get fifty different set of criteria.
Heck, there are some radical environmentalists that see ALL HUMANS as a plague on this planet.
Eugenics just can't be discussed in any serious capacity because it's entirely too subjective.
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers Leftists also have differences in their brains to people on the right, and unfortunately, they would probably consider you a radical as well as a drug abuser.
But am I a leftist?
I consider myself a radical centrist. And if there's one thing a radical centrist would NEVER go for, it's any kind of eugenics regime. -
2019-03-26 at 11:07 PM UTCI remember reading about Ted Bundy's mother still having love for her son, despite him being one of history's biggest rapist lady killers. Not to mention his last victim was a child!
If any of my children, regardless of how much I love them, grew up and turned into Bundies; I would straight up advocate their deaths. -
2019-03-26 at 11:07 PM UTCSpeaking literally you are correct Gadolinium😁
But I think ya’ll know what I’m referring to. -
2019-03-26 at 11:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Octavian I remember reading about Ted Bundy's mother still having love for her son, despite him being one of history's biggest rapist lady killers. Not to mention his last victim was a child!
If any of my children, regardless of how much I love them, grew up and turned into Bundies; I would straight up advocate their deaths.
I used to feel exactly the same way. I could not understand how these moms could still love their kids. I understand now. -
2019-03-26 at 11:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks Also, the term "pedo sympathizer" is entirely too loosely (or, really, not at all) defined.
Does it make me a pedo sympathizer if I would have a problem with my son or daughter being raped repeatedly in prison because they turned out to be a practicing pedophile? Then, by all means, call me a pedo sympathizer, because I guess I am one.
But so are you, Technologist, when you said you would try to get your son/daughter the help they need if you discovered they had the same tendencies, and that you would stand by them for moral support while they endure their criminal sentence.
Really, it's my ultimate contention that LITERALLY EVERYONE would be a so-called "pedo sympathizer" under the right conditions.
If you could sit back and watch, and even enjoy, your own adult son or daughter being sexually abused as some form of "justice", I would accuse you of either being disingenuous, or possibly a psychopath. Either way, you're worse than the remorseful pedophile who seeks to cure their ailment if you ever take actual pleasure in the sexual assault/abuse of another human being.
Now, if "pedo sympathizer" means you actually believe we should be trying to legalize or even de-stigmatize pedophilia, you're an absolute wackjob, quite frankly.
I can't believe I have to repeat this for like the dozenth time in this thread, but, at least in my opinion, RAPE / SEXUAL ASSAULT / SEXUAL ABUSE / and NON-CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE BETWEEN ADULT AND MINOR, are all morally wrong.
You (whomever) have the right to be a rape relativist and take pleasure in another person's sexual assault, but I legitimately see absolutely zero difference between you and the person you condemn.
I'd have no problem throwing one of my kids into an active volcano if necessary -
2019-03-26 at 11:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Octavian I remember reading about Ted Bundy's mother still having love for her son, despite him being one of history's biggest rapist lady killers. Not to mention his last victim was a child!
If any of my children, regardless of how much I love them, grew up and turned into Bundies; I would straight up advocate their deaths.
Would you at least advocate for a humane death?
I mean, I could understand that at least.
I would consider it an act of mercy, even. -
2019-03-26 at 11:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers I'd have no problem throwing one of my kids into an active volcano if necessary
That doesn't strike you as overly dramatic?
I dunno. You raise a child for decades, bond with them, take them to preschool and kindergarten and grade school, throw them birthday parties every year, watch them graduate...
Then you could just drop them into a volcano?
I just don't get it.
That sounds like you might actually have sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies. -
2019-03-26 at 11:15 PM UTCAnd it just straight blows my mind that someone who is supposed to be on the side of the "good" and the "right" can sit there and say they'd throw their own child into a volcano, all with a straight face.
I seriously feel like I'm being trolled here. -
2019-03-26 at 11:17 PM UTCFlesh of my flesh.
-
2019-03-26 at 11:17 PM UTC
-
2019-03-26 at 11:18 PM UTC
