User Controls
What posters did you have on your walls as a teenager?
-
2019-03-26 at 9:50 PM UTC
-
2019-03-26 at 9:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks In fact, why don't we just try to engineer a perfect race? Why stop at the criminals, the diseased, and the mentally inadequate…?
The US and Canadian governments actually did the pioneering work in Eugenics that inspired the Nazis. I'm guessing you knew this already. Anyway there is like I said, way too many people. They're destroying the planet, to me that's more important than trying to coddle every kind of defective criminal in existence, or any group of idiots that makes more kids than they can take care of, leaving the burden to fall on the environment and rest of society. -
2019-03-26 at 9:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by ohfralala I am saying you have not.
And I’m saying you have no clue. I didn’t before I had my son.You cared about children’s well being before and after childbirth as do most other normal people. You love your own child differently, more passionately, yes. We understand the maternal drive.
.
No “we” don’t understand unless “we” are parents.What you aren’t understanding is that someone, with or without a child, can debate such controversial topics rationally and still care about children. Just bc you process your thoughts and emotions one way doesn’t mean everyone else processes their thoughts and emotions in the same manner.
Really? I didn’t know. You mean everyone doesn’t think like me? Say it isn’t so.
All I’m saying is a decent parent would not be a pedo sympathizer. Show me one person in here that is a parent and a pedo sympathizer. You can’t.Hell not every mother even feels that maternal impulse to protect. Some females birth their young into toilets and flush them.
No! Every parent is perfect!———————sarcasm -
2019-03-26 at 9:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I’m actually surprised you jumped on this wagon.
It's silly to start gatekeeping who is capable of sympathizing towards some scenarios and who can't.
Literally everyone has children in their lives (neices, nephews, much younger siblings), but EVEN STILL, that is not a prerequisite for empathy.
I've never had cancer, but I definitely sympathize with those who suffer from it.
I'm not gay, but I can definitely sympathize with someone being gay bashed (actually, I literally was gay bashed in HS by some kids that thought I was gay for some reason, BUT THAT IS STILL NOT A PREREQUISITE FOR SYMPATHY).
Etc, etc, etc.
It's just asinine to gatekeep sympathy.
I mean, if you saw someone bullying a dwarf for their height (assuming here that you don't happen to be a dwarf or have any in your immediate family), would you be completely incapable of sympathizing with them?
That's a scary thought.
If you saw someone push an invalid out of a wheel chair, would that also just completely not phase you?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-26 at 10 PM UTCIt's a means that justifies the end. Only in constant death & destruction can the human race move forward.
It wouldn't have been so bad had the Chinese, Indians & Pakis not been so horny and ruined it for everyone by overpopulating.
In my perfect world they would have been wiped off the face of the earth or atleast been reduced by a good 45%. -
2019-03-26 at 10 PM UTCOne day the state will raise the children.
-
2019-03-26 at 10:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks It's silly to start gatekeeping who is capable of sympathizing towards some scenarios and who can't.
Literally everyone has children in their lives (neices, nephews, much younger siblings), but EVEN STILL, that is not a prerequisite for empathy.
I've never had cancer, but I definitely sympathize with those who suffer from it.
I'm not gay, but I can definitely sympathize with someone being gay bashed (actually, I literally was gay bashed in HS by some kids that thought I was gay for some reason, BUT THAT IS STILL NOT A PREREQUISITE FOR SYMPATHY).
Etc, etc, etc.
It's just asinine to gatekeep sympathy.
I mean, if you saw someone bullying a dwarf for their height (assuming here that you don't happen to be a dwarf or have any in your immediate family), would you be completely incapable of sympathizing with them?
That's a scary thought.
If you saw someone push an invalid out of a wheel chair, would that also just completely not phase you?
You’re taking this totally out of context. I’m saying you will not find a good parent who is a pedo sympathizer. Am I wrong when I say the people here that are pedo sympathizers do not have kids?
The only thing I’m explaining is why I vehemently speak out against it like I do. -
2019-03-26 at 10:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist And I’m saying you have no clue. I didn’t before I had my son.
You had difficulty empathizing before you had a son. That's a sign of NPD. ArmsMerchant had that. Someone should start a poll regarding this subject.
I know a guy who beat the living shit out of a pedophile with a log after the pedo attacked him with a knife. The guy with the log knew the dude was a pedo and said something about it, the pedo said "Oh well I can't wait till I get a younger one than 14" and so the guy said, you're a sick fuck I've got kids and that really offends me" blah blah and so the pedo attacked him, he grabbed a log and smashed the guy
He was right for beating the shit out of the guy, but you don't need kids to be offended. Not at all. Not where I'm from at least. That was the one time I was proud of a liberal. -
2019-03-26 at 10:05 PM UTCBrownnoser,
You notice I’m ignoring you? Just thought I’d point that out. -
2019-03-26 at 10:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Octavian It's a means that justifies the end. Only in constant death & destruction can the human race move forward.
It'll always be one group or more, of people ruining it for the rest. Eventually there will be so many goddamn people on this planet we won't have national forests anymore, no parks, they'll have to bulldoze all of them to make new apartment complexes and condos for all the shitheads that couldn't stop reproducing more than they should. The entire world will become LA or new york.
It wouldn't have been so bad had the Chinese, Indians & Pakis not been so horny and ruined it for everyone by overpopulating.
In my perfect world they would have been wiped off the face of the earth or atleast been reduced by a good 45%. -
2019-03-26 at 10:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers The US and Canadian governments actually did the pioneering work in Eugenics that inspired the Nazis. I'm guessing you knew this already. Anyway there is like I said, way too many people. They're destroying the planet, to me that's more important than trying to coddle every kind of defective criminal in existence, or any group of idiots that makes more kids than they can take care of, leaving the burden to fall on the environment and rest of society.
Ok, when we start talking eugenics, completely unironically, that's pretty much my cue to bail.
And not because I don't think it's theoretically possible to enhance society via eugenics.
Rather, it's because EVERYONE is going to have a different opinion about what constitutes good/valuable genes worth preserving, and which are in need of stemming out.
I mean, let's say there's a highly prolific serial killing cannibal necrophiliac that just happens to be the smartest person in the world, and has actually made incredible strides towards a cure for cancer (that no one else can figure out because he's freakishly brilliant)...
It sounds like you might actually prefer a world in which we kill the serial killer who could potentially save MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS of lives.
So I'm just going to leave that hypothetical there to show precisely why ALL eugenics debates are utterly pointless, and, not to mention, brimming with unethical implications. -
2019-03-26 at 10:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks Ok, when we start talking eugenics, completely unironically, that's pretty much my cue to bail.
And not because I don't think it's theoretically possible to enhance society via eugenics.
Rather, it's because EVERYONE is going to have a different opinion about what constitutes good/valuable genes worth preserving, and which are in need of stemming out.
I mean, let's say there's a highly prolific serial killing cannibal necrophiliac that just happens to be the smartest person in the world, and has actually made incredible strides towards a cure for cancer (that no one else can figure out because he's freakishly brilliant)…
It sounds like you might actually prefer a world in which we kill the serial killer who could potentially save MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS of lives.
So I'm just going to leave that hypothetical there to show precisely why ALL eugenics debates are utterly pointless, and, not to mention, bri
we went from loving us, to loving YOU. bitch ass fight me
Lol -
2019-03-26 at 10:10 PM UTCSponge on because Madonna said it was her favorite cartoon
-
2019-03-26 at 10:10 PM UTC
-
2019-03-26 at 10:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Brownnoser,
Not entirely, you're ignoring me at this point because your arguments are stupid
You notice I’m ignoring you? Just thought I’d point that out.
Originally posted by Technologist Name ‘em!
I named them already. They're democrats/leftists, almost entirely. To get names of specific people would be pointless as it's a mentality that certain groups of people share. You ignored me after that, because you can't intelligently argue your point against several people at once, especially when they're all significantly more intelligent than you. Not to say I don't agree with some of what you say, but your motives for saying those things are likely NPD. -
2019-03-26 at 10:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks It sounds like you might actually prefer a world in which we kill the serial killer who could potentially save MILLIONS, if not BILLIONS of lives.
Eugenics is not my business really, that's the government's business. I have no say in the matter. Although saving billions of people when we're already over-populated is kind of silly. -
2019-03-26 at 10:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist You’re taking this totally out of context. I’m saying you will not find a good parent who is a pedo sympathizer. Am I wrong when I say the people here that are pedo sympathizers do not have kids?
Premise 1: Pedo sympathizers generally tend to not have kids.
Premise 2: No good parent will also be a pedo sympathizer.
Premise 1: PS generally have no K.
Premise 2: No GP are also PS.
It seems like you're making two totally unconnected claims.
But I think somehow the inference that "kids are necessary to sympathize with victims" arose.
inference: Only parents can sympathize with victims.
OR...
Inference: Only P can SV.
But I think we've fairly established by now that one does not require kids of their own in order to sympathize with victims.
That simply does not follow with any logical certainty. -
2019-03-26 at 10:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by DietPiano we went from loving us, to loving YOU. bitch ass fight me
Lol
Under any conceivable eugenics regime, I would always wind up among the preserved.
I can actually boast literal perfection.
Well, except for the being too tall and thus blocking the screen in movie theaters scenario.
I'll be among the first hauled off to the chambers if they use that as a criterion.
> tfw too tall to be an ubermensch -
2019-03-26 at 10:26 PM UTCI agree with you. I never once said that another person without children would not be against a pedo.
I only made an observation that the pedo sympathizers I see on here are childless. Am I wrong?
But me saying that obviously struck a chord because I then became the person who said that childless people cannot sympathize with abused children. -
2019-03-26 at 10:30 PM UTCOh man where do I even start?
-Jadakiss
-styles p
-Jayz rockafeller center
-Baby spice from the spice girls
-michael jordan
-kobe
-steve nash
-allen iverson
-busta rhymes
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-me
-cat
-dog
-that other girl from spice girls(redhead)forgot her name
-pamela anderson
I switch posters based on my moods. The limit was 7. I shared a room with my 2 brothers. My big brother was a bully back then so he was like the headmaster of the room. So if he wanted to switch sides we be like yeah ok lets do this. :)
It was really exciting.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
