User Controls
I got lindsay zywiciel to become a member on here.
-
2018-12-07 at 9:10 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 9:13 PM UTCChecking back to see if she posted her tits yet?
-
2018-12-07 at 9:15 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 9:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Checking back to see if she posted her tits yet?
Hippies all have the same tits.
http://nudehippie.tumblr.comThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-07 at 9:20 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 9:22 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 9:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth How do you know?
Chinese girls might disagree.
Do you guys make your pocket pussies so small just to save on materials? I mean I'm not even big, but my dick won't even all fit into them.
open urinals.
anyway penis size is determined by women, specifically mothers.
a decent, tight women would produce a son with small penis while a promiscuous whore would more likely to give birth to a son with a bigger penis since a bigger penis would be more successful at insemminating a worn, loose vagina than a small one,
so the bigger your penis is, the sluttier you mom was. -
2018-12-07 at 9:29 PM UTC^stupid×2The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-12-07 at 9:31 PM UTCyour moms a whore.
-
2018-12-07 at 9:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth So what is it besides weaponised naievete?
Like literally think about the meaning of these words. Almost every view you hold, every "traditional value" you want to defend entered into the tradition through liberal "revolution". Capitalism is one of the few institutions we can actually call intrinsically liberal as is a model that affords and accepts change. It became the dominant mode of production in the west through liberal policy eroding feudal systems. Christians were persecuted in the west, acceptance of Christian faith and values was a liberal process (inb4 some slave religion BS, suck my dick).
I'm sure someone's going to misunderstand me here, I'm not saying "haha, you were secretly a liberal all along!". Conservatism in the US today is at least a nominally valid position and I'm even sympathetic to some lines of conservative thought along social/religious lines. What I'm saying is that "conservative values made western civilization great" is retarded because there is no coherent set of "conservative values". The set of things designated by "conservative values" is tied to a particular point in history, it's changed radically over time, and it requires extreme historical ignorance to deny this. -
2018-12-07 at 9:46 PM UTCI bet she has a fat ass
-
2018-12-07 at 9:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Like literally think about the meaning of these words. Almost every view you hold, every "traditional value" you want to defend entered into the tradition through liberal "revolution". Capitalism is one of the few institutions we can actually call intrinsically liberal as is a model that affords and accepts change. It became the dominant mode of production in the west through liberal policy eroding feudal systems. Christians were persecuted in the west, acceptance of Christian faith and values was a liberal process (inb4 some slave religion BS, suck my dick).
I'm sure someone's going to misunderstand me here, I'm not saying "haha, you were secretly a liberal all along!". Conservatism in the US today is at least a nominally valid position and I'm even sympathetic to some lines of conservative thought along social/religious lines. What I'm saying is that "conservative values made western civilization great" is retarded because there is no coherent set of "conservative values". The set of things designated by "conservative values" is tied to a particular point in history, it's changed radically over time, and it requires extreme historical ignorance to deny this.
Your ignorance of class perspective has turned your understanding into a crock of shit.
My perspective on class has nothing to do with "liberalism" it's the traditional Irish working class view.
Your idea of what "conservative" values are has nothing to do with tradition, they're just the values of the tradutionally privileged - those inside the city walls, against which your jedi influenced heroes had their goyim fight against for reasons of personal advancement.
What is insane will not work. -
2018-12-07 at 10:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth Your ignorance of class perspective has turned your understanding into a crock of shit.
My perspective on class has nothing to do with "liberalism" it's the traditional Irish working class view.
Your idea of what "conservative" values are has nothing to do with tradition, they're just the values of the tradutionally privileged - those inside the city walls, against which your jedi influenced heroes had their goyim fight against for reasons of personal advancement.
What is insane will not work.
This isn't even a coherent reply to what I wrote lol -
2018-12-07 at 10:06 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 10:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth So
…
is conservatism just a grasping at white racial consciousness?
A fear of outsiders?
No! Jesus fucking christ! I specifically said that was exactly what I wasn't saying, what the fuck? Here, let me show the where I said that:
Originally posted by Lanny I'm sure someone's going to misunderstand me here, I'm not saying "haha, you were secretly a liberal all along!". Conservatism in the US today is at least a nominally valid position and I'm even sympathetic to some lines of conservative thought along social/religious lines. What I'm saying is that "conservative values made western civilization great" is retarded because there is no coherent set of "conservative values". The set of things designated by "conservative values" is tied to a particular point in history, it's changed radically over time, and it requires extreme historical ignorance to deny this.
It's perfectly valid to hold to conservative values today, or at any given point in history. I may not agree with those values but there is at least a coherent set of values we can say something about. It's claims like "conservative values made western civilization great" which are stupid, because "conservative values" across the span of western history aren't a thing. -
2018-12-07 at 10:21 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 10:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny It's claims like "conservative values made western civilization great" which are stupid, because "conservative values" across the span of western history aren't a thing.
Yes, that's true, and I agree. Like no culture is more conservative than Middle Eastern culture, and it's just shit, no matter if it's Muslim, Christian, Zoroastrian or whatever.
Progress flows from a willingness to try out new things, and intelligently reject what doesn't work, and accept what does.
Does modern liberalism really work for us? Kinda rhetorical, given birthrates, costs of living, replacement rates, etc, even you will surely recognise it doesn't.
So why aren't we redefining our tradition within the context of what is known?
One word, starts with a ... ah fuck it you already know who I blame -
2018-12-07 at 10:28 PM UTC
-
2018-12-07 at 10:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth Yes, that's true, and I agree. Like no culture is more conservative than Middle Eastern culture, and it's just shit, no matter if it's Muslim, Christian, Zoroastrian or whatever.
Progress flows from a willingness to try out new things, and intelligently reject what doesn't work, and accept what does.
Great, we agree.Does modern liberalism really work for us? Kinda rhetorical, given birthrates, costs of living, replacement rates, etc, even you will surely recognise it doesn't.
So why aren't we redefining our tradition within the contest of what is known?
One word, starts with a … ah fuck it you already know who I blame
I agree that the way our society is organized today is failing to meet the needs of the population. I don't think we can really call the current state of affairs "liberalism". I'll agree there are some ways in which our society has discarded elements of the traditional without sufficient replacements, in particular many of our unifying institutions like religion or cultural homogeneity are dead, at least here in the US, with no real substitute and that causes bad things (like the extremely polarized political sentiment that we've seen in this very thread). But in other arenas there's a toxic and dogmatic clinging to the traditional including most American nationalist sentiment (although this isn't as old of a tradition as people seem to think), neo-colonialism, and our views on the relationship between the capital holding and working classes. Basically our society is more complex than "liberals bad!" and if you want to chalk every social failure up to the jedis then go for it, but at least realize this secret jedi cabal you blame everything on can't possibly be exclusively liberal in its views.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-07 at 10:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny don't think we can really call the current state of affairs "liberalism".
True, but everywhere you go establishment mouthpieces cry about the end of 'liberal democracy' or somesuch. It may not be accurate but it sure is a popular way to describe what we're living through.if you want to chalk every social failure up to the jedis then go for it, but at least realize this secret jedi cabal you blame everything on can't possibly be exclusively liberal in its views.
Of course not. The entire premise is that they pursue aggressive, immoral policies that actually work (to a degree) in their own state, but push for self-destructive policies in other states they have a degree of control over.
It's not unlike the US in the 50s-90s before they started losing their position as superpower; they would hamstring other other countries through coups, assassinations and violent revolutions - ostensibly to make these other countries more like the 'paradise' that was the US, but in reality keeping them from developing into a serious threat to the monopolar world.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
