User Controls

LOL Facebook page is a blank white page? Haxors?

  1. #21
    RisiR † 29 Autism
    Originally posted by gadzooks So while I said that most people who are paranoid about Facebook collecting their data simply have irrational fears, RisiR brings up a good point that pretty much every human citizen should have at least some trepidation about. The kind of machine learning implementation and application that RisiR speaks of is generally considered to be a good thing. And it does have benefits. For example, if the ads you see are more specifically targeted at you, you'll generally be less bothered by ads for things you're into than completely irrelevant ads.

    A real-world example of this is Facebook Pixel: https://blog.hootsuite.com/facebook-pixel/. This bit of technology is the reason that you keep seeing ads for things you were recently searching about or shopping for. The more specific the niche, the creepier it will feel.

    Now about it being used to control your moods and sway your opinions, these are definitely feasible with current technology, but I'd say it's open to debate as to whether or not such malicious usage is occurring, or even going to occur.

    So basically, all I'm saying is to be informed and educated on how AI works and can be used to manipulate you, but don't start jumping to any conclusions about conspiracies and so forth.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/02/facebook-sorry-secret-psychological-experiment-users
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. #22
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by RisiR † https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/02/facebook-sorry-secret-psychological-experiment-users

    I'll admit I'm not all that surprised.

    It is kind of a good way to gather data for psychology experiments.

    Heck, I can't say I wouldn't be tempted to use such methodology myself if I were still in academia.

    But there are definite ethical issues with it.

    And also, while it might not be all that comforting to most, this example study was carried out with the sole intent of conducting objective research, not for marketing or political influence.
  3. #23
    RisiR † 29 Autism
    Of course there was no political agenda behind this study...
  4. #24
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by RisiR † Of course there was no political agenda behind this study…

    Actually yeah, if they are using news feeds to influence moods, and measuring that, then political bias is almost certainly going to taint the results and any chance at true objectivity.

    But the method has really cool potential.

    I mean, show people sunsets, beaches, puppies, kittens, and other things that people generally find pleasant, and then in the other group show them funerals, spiders, snakes, rain, and other things that people generally find unpleasant.

    Then see if you get the same effect.

    However, it would probably be a stronger effect when it comes to news, because human beings have a tendency to get riled up over political stuff.
  5. #25
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    It's all part of MkUltra, which is still very much alive and well in 2018. The CIA and partnering intelligence agencies want to see if they can control people thoughts and steer political evolution through their Facebook, Twitter and YouTube platforms.
  6. #26
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    My name is totse2k1 and I say things
  7. #27
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Mkiltra red poll meet me at starfucks
  8. #28
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ Mkiltra red poll meet me at starfucks

  9. #29
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No, they don't, because I've never used Facebook. Facebook is owned and operated by the CIA.

    I was speaking generally. I didn't mean _you_ specifically.
  10. #30
    Odigo Messenger - Now With Free 911 Service Houston [back fudge my lingam]
    Originally posted by gadzooks Actually yeah, if they are using news feeds to influence moods, and measuring that, then political bias is almost certainly going to taint the results and any chance at true objectivity.

    But the method has really cool potential.

    I mean, show people sunsets, beaches, puppies, kittens, and other things that people generally find pleasant, and then in the other group show them funerals, spiders, snakes, rain, and other things that people generally find unpleasant.

    Then see if you get the same effect.

    However, it would probably be a stronger effect when it comes to news, because human beings have a tendency to get riled up over political stuff.

    If you pay attention to MSM you'll notice they always use words like "dark" and "fear" when talking about anything they don't like, and words like "vibrant" and "exciting" when talking about anything they do.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. #31
    Odigo Messenger - Now With Free 911 Service Houston [back fudge my lingam]
    Originally posted by Sophie I was speaking generally. I didn't mean _you_ specifically.

    Does facebook even load on Windows XP with 2 gigs of RAM?

    Genuine question.
  12. #32
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Odigo Messenger - Now With Free 911 Service If you pay attention to MSM you'll notice they always use words like "dark" and "fear" when talking about anything they don't like, and words like "vibrant" and "exciting" when talking about anything they do.

    That kind of subtle manipulation from biased news corporations doesn't really surprise me.

    Either way, I'm not really one to follow the MSM (Main Stream Media?).

    There will always be bias, both implicit and explicit.

    You really have to train yourself in critical thinking and logical fallacies if you want to effectively interpret any news source.
  13. #33
    My tweeter is the only news source worth listening to.
  14. #34
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Illuminati
  15. #35
    totse3.com Space Nigga
    Originally posted by GGG I don't really get what data Facebook users are worried about. Private messages? Anything else is easy enough to google. What does Facebook have that other sites don't?

    there are several. For one, they don't monitor their own employees who might sell info if asked by a friend or in the dark sector of society. shit they can't see because it's "Friends restricted". It's like there are ways around to gathering or using your photo to take photos of private data

    then there is the selling to corporations who use it to sell products including those background checkers.

    it's pretty sleezy.
  16. #36
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Facebook is an excellent way to learn everything about a particular person. Once the account has been hacked, all their "private" conversations therein can be perused, captured and exploited. Facebook does all the work for you.
  17. #37
    Originally posted by RisiR † https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/02/facebook-sorry-secret-psychological-experiment-users

    sometimes i wonder if lanny created this site as a lab for her psychological / philosophical experiments.
  18. #38
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No, they don't, because I've never used Facebook. Facebook is owned and operated by the CIA.

    CIA is owned and operated by mossadd.

    the a in cia proves this.
  19. #39
    gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by gadzooks
    Originally posted by gadzooks
    Originally posted by gadzooks
    Originally posted by gadzooks
    Originally posted by gadzooks [b]Illuminati[/b]
Jump to Top