User Controls
Tactical Nukes
-
2018-10-27 at 1:41 AM UTCAre back on the menu boys
Will these weapons lead to more risk? A lower threshold for use?
I wonder if they'll [publicly] update their doctrine, any devolution of command would be scary. -
2018-10-27 at 1:48 AM UTC
-
2018-10-27 at 2:04 AM UTCTacticool nukes
Russia make supersonic low earth orbit bombardment nukes so America is pulling out of proliferation treaty -
2018-10-27 at 2:05 AM UTCNot ready till 2020.
-
2018-10-27 at 2:18 AM UTCShort answer: yes, US is afraid of losing military superiority to Russia and China so they've updated the doctrine to allow nuclear weapons to be used in response to a conventional 'threat'
-
2018-10-27 at 2:19 AM UTC
-
2018-10-27 at 2:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Short answer: yes, US is afraid of losing military superiority to Russia and China so they've updated the doctrine to allow nuclear weapons to be used in response to a conventional 'threat'
the US is far superior to RU / CH in non-nuclear warfare.
the majority...as in 95% or more... of RU / CH high-tech is the result of espionage against the US -
2018-10-27 at 2:34 AM UTC
-
2018-10-27 at 4:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock the US is far superior to RU / CH in non-nuclear warfare.
the majority…as in 95% or more… of RU / CH high-tech is the result of espionage against the US
lol ok
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning The treaty or the new nukes?
Breaking the INF treaty. I posted a little about it in the conflict shitpile thread, basically it doesn't cover drones which have largely taken the place if TBMs/SRBMs -
2018-10-27 at 4:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock the US is far superior to RU / CH in non-nuclear warfare.
the majority…as in 95% or more… of RU / CH high-tech is the result of espionage against the US
well then the US should have developed superior anti-espionage capability to prevent thw occurence of these espionage.
by not developing these anti-espionage capabilities their just asking for it. asking to be espionaged.
hard. -
2018-10-27 at 10:23 AM UTCIsn't most espionage against the US done in person, by ethnic jedis or Chinese working inside the MIC?
The average yank won't ever abandon political correctness. -
2018-10-27 at 11 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning Isn't most espionage against the US done in person, by ethnic jedis or Chinese working inside the MIC?
I'd expect so, people who get into positions where they have access to privileged information in the MIC are typically driven by profit anyway so it'd just be a matter of how much foreign nations are willing to pay.
That said I don't think there's any statistical data on it -
2018-10-27 at 12:01 PM UTCWe need drone missiles. Like The Redeemer nuke in Unreal Tournament 2k4.
Just imagine one of those Stalin organs firing a salvo of missiles, with each independently piloted by a Russian 12 year old sitting at their mom's computer in Perm. -
2018-10-27 at 1:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra lol ok
you should be able to recognize propoganda when you see it. when have the rooskies ever publicized the truth. a: never.
also:
x37
aurora
buran
su-57
j-31 -
2018-10-27 at 1:48 PM UTC
-
2018-10-27 at 5:48 PM UTC
-
2018-10-28 at 1:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny and yet its not my multi billion f35 that can be easily seen by obsolete enemy radar and cant fly that got stolen.
im an idiot, my only comfort is that im not the only one.
stfu and gtfo my planet
stealth has been detectable since the F117
they still dont have the capability of doing anything about it. especially now after the pilots learned their lesson from yugoslappya. -
2018-10-28 at 1:37 AM UTCDidn't they learn their lesson with the davy crocket?
-
2018-10-28 at 1:45 AM UTCnuclear hand grenade
-
2018-10-28 at 3:48 AM UTC