User Controls
Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-15 at 9:19 PM UTCAs demonstrated above, the idea that your identity ends where your memory does, is internally inconsistent and self contradictory. As such, it makes no sense: to assume such a proposition as true would be to assume it as false as well. Even if you change the parameters to avoid this identity, you are simply going to defeat the idea by... not actually making any argument for identity.
-
2018-10-15 at 11:28 PM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 3:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by playingindirt I've never been for abortion. I went through menopause before I ever hit 50.
a couple hot flashes and it was over. the women in my family don't have many symptoms. it was a snap and a swirl. lolz had a tumor the size of a grapefruit and now I have no uterus.
post pics of vagina sans uterus -
2018-10-16 at 3:30 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 3:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing Simple example: your statement posits that "you" did in fact exist as far back as your memory goes.
If the version of you that corresponds to your earliest memory is a valid version of "you", then it logically follows that their earliest memory of themselves is also a valid version of "them", and by extension (because you are literally making an identity claim), a valid version of you.
We can just daisy chain the same definition together until there is no break in continuity, down to whatever causal chain can be said to inform your memory and biological pre-memory processes that ended up informing your memory, all the way back to the big bang. So you haven't solved shit with this approach.
Then if you want to hang on to memory theory, you need to draw a semantic line somewhere to separate memory from simple syntactical causation (like a chain of dominoes), and good luck with that.
you are literally slopping together irrelevant words and terminology for absolutely no reason to make posts that are literally shit-posts with flower-die words.
take your shit-alt and shitcan it...where it belongs -
2018-10-16 at 3:32 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 3:35 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 4:09 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 5:10 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 5:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing As demonstrated above, the idea that your identity ends where your memory does, is internally inconsistent and self contradictory. As such, it makes no sense: to assume such a proposition as true would be to assume it as false as well. Even if you change the parameters to avoid this identity, you are simply going to defeat the idea by… not actually making any argument for identity.
it does not.
people with dementia are no different than plants that breath oxygens shits out solid and semi solid wastes. -
2018-10-16 at 5:33 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 6:04 AM UTClook we need to have blood sacrifice one way or another
-
2018-10-16 at 9:36 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 11:03 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 11:18 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 12:09 PM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 12:15 PM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 12:19 PM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 12:39 PM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 1:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing He meant with each other. With someone else, you have to cut half your retard genes with the normal population.
I had a kid with a retarded brown girl though.
She named the baby "Brayleta"
Which is not actually a name anyone has ever used for a human ever. She literally made up a random name for the kid
Originally posted by Speedy Parker They can't afford potato chips not crisps, potato chips.
I don't get it