User Controls
We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
-
2018-03-06 at 2:04 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 2:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by inb4l0pht Some people use advanced vocabulary and phrasing naturally, especially if they're used to writing in an academic context. Maybe you're just a halfwit and struggle with comprehension.
'advanced vocabulary and phrasing' is used by those with inferiority complexes and easy-access to a thesaurus of some sort who sprinkle pretty little $5.00 words everywhere when convenient and easy to understand 50-cent words would do just fine.
niggers do that shit a lot. theyll have their fancy-shmancy vocabular-ity words then theyll hit a point of conversation they dont have the mental capacity to grasp then boom...there goes the ebonics. -
2018-03-06 at 2:14 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 2:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL He has a point, though, Lanny. When you compose your post, you always go out of your way to complicate the language. You kind of ramble on using tier3 phrasing, and basically try to convey a sense of superiority and aloofness as you attempt to make your points. Could just be the booze, I dunno.
I admit I ramble and that my writing is pretty wordy. It's really not trying to act superior, you'll notice most my posts have some kind of spelling or grammar error in them. This is just how I write without editing, has been for years, what can I say? -
2018-03-06 at 2:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by inb4l0pht Some people use advanced vocabulary and phrasing naturally, especially if they're used to writing in an academic context. Maybe you're just a halfwit and struggle with comprehension.
Also this, there's kind of a culture of writing this way in academia which is where I do most my writing. I think it's not really a great way of writing, I think a lot of research papers are unnecessarily hard to read as a result, but it's kinda just the way it is.
Originally posted by Issue313 So we're comparing processed dry powder with cattle muscle?
Yes, is there a problem with that? -
2018-03-06 at 2:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Also this, there's kind of a culture of writing this way in academia which is where I do most my writing. I think it's not really a great way of writing, I think a lot of research papers are unnecessarily hard to read as a result, but it's kinda just the way it is.
Yes, is there a problem with that?
if thats how you write when the audience isnt a bunch of junkies, flunkies, and monkeys, its no wonder everyone makes fun of you. regardless of your vocabulary choices your syntax and communicated ideas-stream is abysmal.
like i said...eggheads intentionally use overpriced words unnecessarily in an effort to makes themselves appear smart-uhhr.
processed food products do not equate to unprocessed food products, retart.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-03-06 at 2:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock genetic engineering is not categorically bad. genetic engineering involving manipulation of the genome followed by virtually immediate release…literally…into the wild with little to no oversight and safety precautions…is bad.
Fine, can you show that this characterizes soy crops today?40 years. thats funny. funny in the way that a nigger crossing the street getting hit by a bus going 80mph is funny. go look into the facts and how quickly a GM organism goes from lab to in-the-dirt planting with inadequate quarantine boundaries.
Yeah, like a decade of development and testing for an individual crop bro. 40 years is how long we've been creating GM organisms for.youre doing it again…comparing apples to hand grenades. soy protein isolate is not soy protein. if youre going to invoke isolates then other protein type isolates or concentrates can be brought into the equation which will send soy straight to the bottom of the list…surpassed in shit-tier protein quality only by collagen protein. soy protein has one of the worse calorie-to-protein ratio of all protein types. theres a reason soy protein is the cheapest. its shit.
Shifting goalposts. The question has never been "is soy nutritionally superior to meat". You started this by claiming you can't have a nutritionally sufficient diet without animal products. You were wrong, now you're trying to argue something else.
The fact remains that you can satisfy your protein requirements with soy better than any historical omnivore ever could.you dont have to cringe just yet…you still have some fattening up to do before you find yourself tied to a spit, rotating over an open fire with a nice juicy apple crammed into your craw.
Yeah bro, I'm definitely going to get cannibalized because I don't eat meat. That makes so much sense. You weak little bitch.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-03-06 at 2:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock if thats how you write when the audience isnt a bunch of junkies, flunkies, and monkeys, its no wonder everyone makes fun of you. regardless of your vocabulary choices your syntax and communicated ideas-stream is abysmal.
like i said…eggheads intentionally use overpriced words unnecessarily in an effort to makes themselves appear smart-uhhr.
processed food products do not equate to unprocessed food products, retart.
lol, your writing style is shitty rape jokes every 3 minutes. Grade schoolers have better compositional skills than you. Eat a dick.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-03-06 at 2:41 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 2:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock like i said…eggheads intentionally use overpriced words unnecessarily in an effort to makes themselves appear smart-uhhr.
I heard the analogy "like a squid throwing up a cloud of ink to obscure itself", and this usually applies.
If you can't understand a paper it's cos it's most likely because it's stupid.
People with real ideas want to be widely understood above all. -
2018-03-06 at 2:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Fox Paws I thought you said GM organisms have been around since ancient times.
Stop changing your story
40 years is how long we've been making "transgenetic" organisms for, that is altering genomes by means other than crafted selective pressures. We've been modifying genomes through selective pressures for thousands of years. You can find all of this and more on wikipedia in like 10 minutes of reading. -
2018-03-06 at 2:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny 40 years is how long we've been making "transgenetic" organisms for, that is altering genomes by means other than crafted selective pressures.
That’s better.
Originally posted by Lanny We've been modifying genomes through selective pressures for thousands of years. You can find all of this and more on wikipedia in like 10 minutes of reading.
No shit dumbass, I was making a point to catch you in a contradiction. But I know you only initially mentioned the ancient history of selective breeding (even though no one was talking about this) to be a fucking smartass anyway -
2018-03-06 at 3:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I admit I ramble and that my writing is pretty wordy. It's really not trying to act superior, you'll notice most my posts have some kind of spelling or grammar error in them. This is just how I write without editing, has been for years, what can I say?
I hate to say this, but I got the distinct gut feeling earlier and the past couple of weeks that you deliberately inputted those spelling and grammar errors, and I was wondering to myself, why the hell would he do that?? Call me crazy. -
2018-03-06 at 3:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL I hate to say this, but I got the distinct gut feeling earlier and the past couple of weeks that you deliberately inputted those spelling and grammar errors, and I was wondering to myself, why the hell would he do that?? Call me crazy.
No he’s just drunk 90% of the time when posting here.
Personally I always thought the juxtaposition of Lanny’s pseudointellectual try-hard verbosity with his really shitty grammar and spelling is pretty comical -
2018-03-06 at 3:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Fox Paws No he’s just drunk 90% of the time when posting here.
Personally I always thought the juxtaposition of Lanny’s pseudointellectual try-hard verbosity with his really shitty grammar and spelling is pretty comical
It doesn't bother me, really. I just like to analyse people. -
2018-03-06 at 3:24 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 3:45 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 4 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 4:45 AM UTC
-
2018-03-06 at 4:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by Fox Paws No he’s just drunk 90% of the time when posting here.
Yeah, pretty much this.Personally I always thought the juxtaposition of Lanny’s pseudointellectual try-hard verbosity with his really shitty grammar and spelling is pretty comical
What do you think "pseudointellectual" means?
