User Controls

Navigation

Niggas in Space > Help and Suggestions > DNS failover to Newtotse
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5

DNS failover to Newtotse

  1. 2018-02-25 at 2:55 AM UTC
    #21
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Originally posted by benny vader formatted for clarification.

    Lol spectral just got told by a retard
  2. 2018-02-25 at 6:04 AM UTC
    #22
    WE SMOOTH African Astronaut
    Lanny hasn't weighed in on this yet.
  3. 2018-02-25 at 8:12 AM UTC
    #23
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    oh yeah, gonna get right on that. Let me just get out my checkbook.
  4. 2018-02-25 at 10:47 AM UTC
    #24
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL This site can’t provide a secure connection
    newtotse.com uses an unsupported protocol.
    ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH
    Hide details
    The client and server don't support a common SSL protocol version or cipher suite. This is likely to be caused when the server needs RC4, which is no longer considered secure.

    Open up the F12 developer tools and click on the security tab and see what it says.
  5. 2018-02-25 at 11:20 AM UTC
    #25
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Issue313 Open up the F12 developer tools and click on the security tab and see what it says.

    It says "This page is not secure.".
  6. 2018-02-25 at 11:21 AM UTC
    #26
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Burn your computer.
  7. 2018-02-25 at 11:22 AM UTC
    #27
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by benny vader video sites killed the textfile stars.

    How many points do i get for getting this reference?

  8. 2018-02-25 at 11:28 AM UTC
    #28
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Issue313 Burn your computer.

  9. 2018-02-25 at 12:41 PM UTC
    #29
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Your site needs to support a cipher that is available in Windows XP, which is why you are getting the cipher suite mismatch. Your SSL Labs test report lists the following ciphers:

    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02b) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (0xc023) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (0xc009) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0xc02c) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 (0xc024) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (0xc00a) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc008) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 112
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (0xcc14) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256P
    (P) This server prefers ChaCha20 suites with clients that don't have AES-NI (e.g., Android devices)

    Here are the supported TLS cipher suites in Windows XP/Server 2003.

    TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
    TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa380512(v=vs.85).aspx

    Your site won't work from Windows XP at all. You need to add one of the supported suites if you want to support Windows XP. The one most commonly used seems to be the aforementioned TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA.
  10. 2018-02-25 at 12:43 PM UTC
    #30
    Grimace motherfucker [my enumerable hindi guideword]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Your site needs to support a cipher that is available in Windows XP, which is why you are getting the cipher suite mismatch. Your SSL Labs test report lists the following ciphers:

    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0xc02b) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (0xc023) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA (0xc009) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 128
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0xc02c) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 (0xc024) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA (0xc00a) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA (0xc008) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 112
    TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (0xcc14) ECDH secp256r1 (eq. 3072 bits RSA) FS 256P
    (P) This server prefers ChaCha20 suites with clients that don't have AES-NI (e.g., Android devices)

    Here are the supported TLS cipher suites in Windows XP/Server 2003.

    TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
    TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5
    TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5
    TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa380512(v=vs.85).aspx

    Your site won't work from Windows XP at all. You need to add one of the supported suites if you want to support Windows XP. The one most commonly used seems to be the aforementioned TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA.

    Christ, Speccy. XP is officially unsupported since April of 2014. You're grasping at straws here. If anyone is using XP (even POS systems with +5 years extra updates) is asking for security holes.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. 2018-02-25 at 12:46 PM UTC
    #31
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Grimace Christ, Speccy. XP is officially unsupported since April of 2014. You're grasping at straws here. If anyone is using XP (even POS systems with +5 years extra updates) is asking for security holes.

    Lots of workplaces and educational institutions, and even some old-school users like me, still use WinXP. That's because it's super fast, smooth, never crashes, and has very few problems in functionality. So, you may deem it unusable and outdated, but there are still millions of users out there who will continue to use it.
  12. 2018-02-25 at 12:50 PM UTC
    #32
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    That's interesting.

    I don't have an XP machine, but neither newtotse.com or niggasin.space will work on my MacOS9 iBook.

    I guess neither site will allow you to browse unencrypted.
  13. 2018-02-25 at 12:51 PM UTC
    #33
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Lots of workplaces and educational institutions, and even some old-school users like me, still use WinXP. That's because it's super fast, smooth, never crashes, and has very few problems in functionality. So, you may deem it unusable and outdated, but there are still millions of users out there who will continue to use it.

    That's an appeal to popularity Special and it's an idiotic reason for using A)Windows B)An outdated version.
  14. 2018-02-25 at 1 PM UTC
    #34
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    There are still about 140 million computers around the world using WinXP. Fact.
  15. 2018-02-25 at 1:01 PM UTC
    #35
    Grimace motherfucker [my enumerable hindi guideword]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Lots of workplaces and educational institutions, and even some old-school users like me, still use WinXP. That's because it's super fast, smooth, never crashes, and has very few problems in functionality. So, you may deem it unusable and outdated, but there are still millions of users out there who will continue to use it.

    I totally agree with you 100%. Lots of people still use it. Lots of the developing world uses it. Where they did well to have computers for their workplaces or educational institutions. They'd be hard pressed to make a budget to upgrade to a modern OS. As stable and lovable as XP was, the fact of the matter remains. From a security standpoint, it's like Swiss cheese - full of holes - unpatched at that. Sure, there are efforts to patch them from private groups, but the common user isn't doing that. XP is a security risk, as great and stable as it was and is.
  16. 2018-02-25 at 1:05 PM UTC
    #36
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There are still about 140 million computers around the world using WinXP. Fact.

    There's about 140 million security issues with WinXP. Fact.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. 2018-02-25 at 1:05 PM UTC
    #37
    Grimace motherfucker [my enumerable hindi guideword]
    Originally posted by Sophie There's about 140 million security issues with WinXP. Fact.

    Yep.
  18. 2018-02-25 at 1:16 PM UTC
    #38
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Sophie There's about 140 million security issues with WinXP. Fact.

    It's really over-hyped. As long as you are running service pack 3 on it with a good rule-based firewall, you're totally fine. I've been using it for years without any issue at all.
  19. 2018-02-25 at 1:17 PM UTC
    #39
    Grimace motherfucker [my enumerable hindi guideword]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Your site won't work from Windows XP at all…




    Just sayin'.
  20. 2018-02-25 at 1:19 PM UTC
    #40
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Firefox is not Chrome.
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
Jump to Top