User Controls
Fags shouldn't raise children
-
2018-01-04 at 3:29 PM UTCyou stink of dry nut bill
-
2018-01-04 at 3:47 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 4:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery Is a dry nut bill when you use a dollar to clean your dick after wanking?
its one of his customers named bill who has orifice-fucked him so many times the poor fellow completely emptied his ballsack. the individual is a nigger so obviously has no personal hygiene habits, therefore stinks. -
2018-01-04 at 4:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock sucks to be a zipperhead male in a one-child-fam'bly where no one likes women…
congratulations china…youve turned you country into a bunch of faggots.
actually no. we have small penis becos he have less reliance on it,
we dont think with our penises and we dont easily give in to its cravings.
my hypothesis is only applicable to white people just as it is applicable only to grasshoppers and lemmings. -
2018-01-04 at 4:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Is there a point? Have you ever seen me ascribe mystical powers to the former president, interact with his campaign committee, or give him a dime of my money? Or was that just an unsolicited jab at a finished politician for kicks?
not you specifically, just people generally.
people who thought obama or trump might have mystical powers to heal the economy and/or make america great again, whatever that is .....
politics, politicians and political activities and everything to do with it are cults according to your criteria and it too, should be barred from being exposed to children. -
2018-01-04 at 5:29 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 5:39 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 5:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader why ????
do you let men with bigger penis than yours jam theirs into your asshole ????
by stating your ilk has less reliance on a dick, with the sole purpose of a dick being to insert into a female orifice for fertilization, you are de facto saying you dont need to insert a dick into a female, leaving the only 'sexual' function remaining being as the recipient of the penis belonging to someone else. -
2018-01-04 at 6:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock by stating your ilk has less reliance on a dick, with the sole purpose of a dick being to insert into a female orifice for fertilization, you are de facto saying you dont need to insert a dick into a female, leaving the only 'sexual' function remaining being as the recipient of the penis belonging to someone else.
since when did ''less reliance'' became equals to ''0 reliance''.
so what, when chooses to engage in celibacy he instantly become a taker in the ass ??? -
2018-01-04 at 7:07 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 7:13 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 7:28 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 7:38 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 7:58 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 8 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 8:12 PM UTC
-
2018-01-04 at 9 PM UTC
-
2018-01-05 at 3:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader we have small penis
my hypothesis is only applicable to white people
http://www.newsweek.com/penis-whitening-laser-procedure-goes-viral-thailand-770962
poor zipperheads... -
2018-01-05 at 3:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Okay, how?
Like I said, by looking at stats or consulting studies on the efficacy of given interventions in the medical case. I could destroy the wiring in my own home to the point that I'm unable to repair it and then put an electrician to the task of repairing it. There seem to be some methodological issues in testing the christian claims of an afterlife.I mean I don't know dude, we seem to have a lot of stuff flying around these days about conservative or liberal media bias, it could all be fake news.
And you could be a brain in a vat and all your sensory input could be falsified by an evil demon whose power is matched only by his malevolence. But we generally accept this isn't the case. Again, I'm not arguing for the infallibility of the medical practice, I'm arguing we have more reason to believe in its efficacy than the claims of Christianity.Sure, now that's a decent answer. Do you have these stats? Could you demonstrate it for this specific point.
UN life expectancy projections, starting in 1950 when Guam was made a US territory, a civilian government was established, and the US began to oversee the construction of infrastructure including the first western hospital open to the native population:
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/guam-population/life-expectancy/
Life expectancy sharply rises following this event. It's unfortunate we don't have earlier records but oral traditions give a pretty clear idea of what life was like prior (I mean territory era is still in living memory) and it's pretty clear longevity was low.But the point still stands, you have no idea if such an apparatus exists, is effective, or if it's even functional. I mean, I certainly couldn't prove the existence of the planet Mercury. I probably couldn't audit the existence of Mercury. I probably couldn't audit the science behind the demonstration of the existence of Mercury. That's why I'm asking you to actually take the steps to quickly audit something like doctors: we can talk about the apparatus in place to do X, Y and Z and why it's preposterous for something to be any other way, but I believe that proving or confirming things that we generally take to be true, is not easy and you should have about as much confidence in their validity, as that of the existence of God.
Again, you're equivocating on "proof" and "reason to believe". I have good reasons to believe modern medical practice is effective: there's coincidence of medical practice and good health in directly accessible experience, there are artifacts of medical research which are difficult to explain without reference to an effective medical research apparatus. I don't have undoubtable proof of these things in the same way I don't have undoubtable proof that I have hands. I just have convincing evidence, which is the best you're ever going to get for any proposition about the world.I mean, how do you know that the prosperity of Christian nations Vs non-Christian nations is not because of the love of Buddy Jesus?
I don't know that that's not true, I have reasons to believe it, primarily because divine intervention is not necessary to explain the prosperity of "christian nations". -
2018-01-05 at 3:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock the only thing i consider when it comes to the modern medical profession, in all its different forms, is that they dont know jack, nor shit.
that being said…it is a simple process to observe the procedures they use to make a determination for mental diseases then apply it to faggotry.
on a related side note, i was in a 'debate' with an uber-liberal about mental diseases then went down a list about how the witch-doctors determined a certain mental disease was to be listed in the DSM, the causes, behaviors, traits, etc, then after the fucktard agreed with everything in the mistaken assumption i was furthering their side of the argument i pointed out that everything i had listed applied to the mental disease known as liberalism. thats when the name calling started and throwing around newspeak terms like 'you ith rathiss' and stuff.
You missed the point of my post finny. I wasn't trying to argue with you. I'm well aware it would be pointless, you'll never be convinced of anything.
I was telling you that you're autistic.
