User Controls
Lanny's New Shtick
-
2017-12-09 at 8:07 AM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 9:09 AM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 3:42 PM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 5:15 PM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 6:05 PM UTCThere were two instances along the way where I could have turned the majority of the userbase against Lanny, but I chose not to, regardless of the few remaining shitbags in opposition. That should tell you something. It's not that I dislike this place, because I actually do. But, you know, we can't have bogus butthurt bans showing up on user accounts which haven't spammed anything. That's just not kosher. We have to play a clean game here. If the member wants to play games, and really does fuck up, then you can rightfully nail them to the wall. I do not have any issue with that. But when content which is not spam is banned or molested or harassed, that begins to make my blood boil, and then the only thing I can come up with is an accounting - a balancing of the scales, whether the judge likes it or not. And is that really so unreasonable or something to be condemned for? I think not.
-
2017-12-09 at 6:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL There were two instances along the way where I could have turned the majority of the userbase against Lanny, but I chose not to, regardless of the few remaining shitbags in opposition. That should tell you something. It's not that I dislike this place, because I actually do. But, you know, we can't have bogus butthurt bans showing up on user accounts which haven't spammed anything. That's just not kosher. We have to play a clean game here. If the member wants to play games, and really does fuck up, then you can rightfully nail them to the wall. I do not have any issue with that. But when content which is not spam is banned or molested or harassed, that begins to make my blood boil, and then the only thing I can come up with is an accounting - a balancing of the scales, whether the judge likes it or not. And is that really so unreasonable or something to be condemned for? I think not.
5% of users read this post past the first sentenceThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-12-09 at 6:09 PM UTC"few remaining shitbags in opposition"...
-
2017-12-09 at 6:10 PM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 6:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny is Satan I already have.
I think Lanny still has several "loyalists", as it were. You may have turned some, but for the gambit to work, practically all of them need to be turned. Not saying that's impossible, as I could clearly see it can be done, but as one member asked recently, "Why should the whole userbase have to pay the price for what one or a few members do?" I thought that was a very relevant question to ask, and I've adjusted my game plan accordingly. -
2017-12-09 at 6:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL There were two instances along the way where I could have turned the majority of the userbase against Lanny, but I chose not to, regardless of the few remaining shitbags in opposition. That should tell you something. It's not that I dislike this place, because I actually do. But, you know, we can't have bogus butthurt bans showing up on user accounts which haven't spammed anything. That's just not kosher. We have to play a clean game here. If the member wants to play games, and really does fuck up, then you can rightfully nail them to the wall. I do not have any issue with that. But when content which is not spam is banned or molested or harassed, that begins to make my blood boil, and then the only thing I can come up with is an accounting - a balancing of the scales, whether the judge likes it or not. And is that really so unreasonable or something to be condemned for? I think not.
You couldn't turn a Arab against a jedi. -
2017-12-09 at 7:04 PM UTC
-
2017-12-09 at 8:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL but I chose not to
You apparently choose not to do any of the things that could apparently ROCK SOMEONE'S WORLD, regardless of the circumstances or how egregious their sins in your eyes.
So either you are infinitely unwilling to do anything, or lying and incapable of doing anything.
In either case, there is no reason anyone will ever take anything you post seriously.
Now for my money, I have always known you are just a shit troll who somehow managed to use FREEZE PEACH as a shield, but fail to convert that into any actual trolling. You basically just uselessly post about the same shit, it's nothing more than mildly annoying sometimes at this point, so there is never a payoff to it.
But on the off chance that you're not trolling and are genuinely trying to effect change, then you are just straight up a fucking retard, and I do not understand how after over a decade of shit threats that fail to ever effect change, you haven't grasped the fact that you are completely ineffective and impotent.
TL;Dr: You don't scare anyone, kid.
Lanny, close reg and ban spectrum -
2017-12-09 at 11:24 PM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 6:02 AM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 7:51 AM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 8:50 AM UTCLet’s try another one, thank this post if -SpectraL should be banned
-
2017-12-10 at 8:54 AM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 9:21 AM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 9:23 AM UTC
-
2017-12-10 at 9:42 AM UTC
