User Controls
If Racial Equality is the Goal...Riddle Me This:
-
2017-08-30 at 11:04 AM UTC
-
2017-08-30 at 11:06 AM UTC^weird considering you're in a country that founded nazism.
-
2017-08-30 at 1:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I mean I think it's a total bitch move on the part of those corporations, I think as publically operating businesses, all of which have put a lot of effort into establishing themselves as the closest thing to a monopoly they as they can, each has an ethical obligation to provide equal service to their customers regardless of any unsavory politics they may hold to. But I think corporations and people have a lot of ethical duties which aren't enforced by law. And calling it a double standard or censorship seems like a disingenuous argument.
That's why there were groups such as the Totse Army, and in modern times, Anonymous, to stick it these law-breaking, censuring, commie freaks at every possible turn. People need to stand uo for their right to free speech, regardless if that speech hurts people's little feelings. -
2017-08-30 at 4:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL That's why there were groups such as the Totse Army, and in modern times, Anonymous, to stick it these law-breaking, censuring, commie freaks at every possible turn. People need to stand uo for their right to free speech, regardless if that speech hurts people's little feelings.
that.
the entirety of their existence is pure hypocrisy.
they carry signs about 'peace' and claim to hate x-group or y-proponents for the alleged violent leanings yet they're the ones committing all the acts of violence. -
2017-08-30 at 4:41 PM UTCThe Internet is still public domain, no matter what these crooked Commies try to insist. I could claim the Brooklyn Bridge as mine right now, but that doesn't make it mine. These freaks will never control something they can't own.
-
2017-08-30 at 6:35 PM UTC
-
2017-08-30 at 6:36 PM UTC
-
2017-08-30 at 6:51 PM UTCBitch all you guys want but I haven't seen a libtard give a good answer to the OP.
-
2017-08-30 at 7:38 PM UTC
-
2017-08-30 at 7:46 PM UTC
-
2017-08-31 at 2:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by RisiR † It is not accessable from my country without a proxy.
Yeah, what the German government does is definitely censorship, no denying that. But what do you expect from nazis?
Originally posted by -SpectraL That's why there were groups such as the Totse Army, and in modern times, Anonymous, to stick it these law-breaking, censuring, commie freaks at every possible turn. People need to stand uo for their right to free speech, regardless if that speech hurts people's little feelings.
What exactly about the storefront closure do you think is illegal?
Originally posted by infinityshock that.
the entirety of their existence is pure hypocrisy.
they carry signs about 'peace' and claim to hate x-group or y-proponents for the alleged violent leanings yet they're the ones committing all the acts of violence.
Who are "they"? It's clear you're mad but I'm not sure even you know who you're mad at. -
2017-08-31 at 2:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny What exactly about the storefront closure do you think is illegal?
Well, we can start with the Constitution. The Constitution supersedes all other laws, and it is the basis for the entirety of all other laws. In clear language, the Constitution provides the unequivocal right to free speech. In taking down StormFront, the government has broken the supreme law of the land. Whether they excuse it, or try to explain it away, or point to laws which are already rendered null and void under the Constitution, matters not. I could rob a bank, and then insist robbing banks is legal, then declare myself innocent, but I would still be a criminal, regardless. Just because these thugs insist they are not criminals does not make it so. They ARE criminals, and the Constitution clearly says so. -
2017-08-31 at 2:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, we can start with the Constitution. The Constitution supersedes all other laws, and it is the basis for the entirety of all other laws. In clear language, the Constitution provides the unequivocal right to free speech. In taking down StormFront, the government has broken the supreme law of the land. Whether they excuse it, or try to explain it away, or point to laws which are already rendered null and void under the Constitution, matters not. I could rob a bank, and then insist robbing banks is legal, then declare myself innocent, but I would still be a criminal, regardless. Just because these thugs insist they are not criminals does not make it so. They ARE criminals, and the Constitution clearly says so.
The government didn't close them down, though. The domain hosting company did. The first amendment keeps the government from impeding freedom of speech, but it doesn't stop private citizens or corporations from reacting to speech they disagree with.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-08-31 at 9:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery The government didn't close them down, though. The domain hosting company did. The first amendment keeps the government from impeding freedom of speech, but it doesn't stop private citizens or corporations from reacting to speech they disagree with.
It's conspiracy. -
2017-08-31 at 10:18 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-08-31 at 10:33 AM UTC
-
2017-08-31 at 11:30 AM UTCIf racial equality is what we're working for, don't you think you should stop talking about negro dick.
-
2017-08-31 at 11:50 AM UTCIn the pursuit of equality, you first have to make a distinction between at least two groups/classes/races, and it is that very distinction which dooms the philosophy to failure. The term "racist" itself is a non-starter, because there is no race. There is no them and them and them in the first place. Everyone already is equal, regardless of their creed, nationality or skin color. No, the real issue, the real problem, the real threat to be addressed stems from the existence of the perpetrator. The victims have nothing to do with it. The focus should not be on the victims, the focus should be on the person who fails to understand basic facts.
-
2017-08-31 at 12:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL In the pursuit of equality, you first have to make a distinction between at least two groups/classes/races, and it is that very distinction which dooms the philosophy to failure. The term "racist" itself is a non-starter, because there is no race. There is no them and them and them in the first place. Everyone already is equal, regardless of their creed, nationality or skin color. No, the real issue, the real problem, the real threat to be addressed stems from the existence of the perpetrator. The victims have nothing to do with it. The focus should not be on the victims, the focus should be on the person who fails to understand basic facts.
Good post. -
2017-08-31 at 12:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL In the pursuit of equality, you first have to make a distinction between at least two groups/classes/races, and it is that very distinction which dooms the philosophy to failure. The term "racist" itself is a non-starter, because there is no race. There is no them and them and them in the first place. Everyone already is equal, regardless of their creed, nationality or skin color. No, the real issue, the real problem, the real threat to be addressed stems from the existence of the perpetrator. The victims have nothing to do with it. The focus should not be on the victims, the focus should be on the person who fails to understand basic facts.
that's another side of he equality coin.
the media and retards constantly harp on the disproportionate rate of prison incarceration or school disciple towards niggers. their deluded reasoning is, the niggers are being persecuted by mean old whitey. they're so fucking retarded they can't possibly comprehend the fact that the niggers are disproportionately the ones causing problems to warrant their discipline or incarceration.
