User Controls
Come watch NASA Launch Luner Lander
-
2025-02-08 at 2:06 AM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 8:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Genesis 1:23-31
23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.
24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so.
25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.
31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.
at what time did God created negroes ? -
2025-02-08 at 5:06 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 5:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina at what time did God created negroes ?
If you believe the Ancient Hebrew text it Says God cursed Ham's first Son Canaan in which became the Canaanites which were "Black as a crow" sort of insinuates this is how Blacks came about.
Some scholars suggest this didn't mean Black people in General but the older paintings of Ham were of a Black Man while Japheth was more White and Shem was brownish.
Remember that every disaster in all Cultures leads to a Great Flood between 8 and 10k years ago.
I think Noah was real but there is a question if they were the only survivors. -
2025-02-08 at 6:18 PM UTCThe ark was a spaceship and the animals were DNA samples
-
2025-02-08 at 6:41 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 6:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood
They claim to be J'ews (They probably had jedi trade ship sailors mating with women and then teaching them the religion. this is why many of them are light skinned)
But Africans are Canaan people. and this goes against the Shemitic laws that they must breed with other Shemites.
this is why Israel has 1/3rd Canaanite tested J'ews. based on their benchmark of what a real J'ew is.
Modern Beliefs in J'ewish people is riddled with false teachings. the Reformed or Ultra Orthodox kind of get it. but the teachings have been altered over time to meet their modern lifestyle which violate God' in many ways. also the God's Loophole is sadly a real thing. transfer sin to chickens.
Also some might suggest Islam is not a true Abrahamic religion because Muslim believe that Ishmael was the first born and not issac meaning Israelis are decedents of Ishmael (first born of Abraham before Sarah could conceive Issac and brothers)
Ishmael was a wild Canaanite and Abraham and his wife condemned them and sent them back to Egypt. Sarah couldn't conceive no matter how hard she tried to and chose that their Egyptian Concubine (Hagar) be allowed to create a surrogate child to inherited the Kingdom. it just changes course that Ishmael was the true first born and therefore you become Israel (which God renamed Issacs son, Jacob)
So only Christians and J'ews believe that Issacs was chosen and not Ishmael who was disassociated with being a Son and cast out and back to Egypt where Ishmaels mother was from.
this caused jealousy and why we have War today. in a nutshell anyways. it's branched off into other psychotic religions. -
2025-02-08 at 7 PM UTCToo stupid didn't read
-
2025-02-08 at 7:01 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:02 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:02 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:04 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:05 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:13 PM UTChttps://www.catholicpilgrim.net/blog-posts/an-atheists-question-how-can-you-possibly-believe-in-noah-and-the-great-flood
An Atheist's Question: How Can You Possibly Believe in Noah and the Great Flood?
Recently, I've been having a back and forth with an atheist and he's thrown out a ton of questions, but I told him we can only take one topic at a time. It's hard to debate and discuss multiple topics in person, let alone on Facebook Messenger. I'll present his question in his words and lay out my answer.
Question: What about Noah and the great flood where millions died leaving only an incestuous family left alive?
Noah. Everyone knows the story of Noah, even non-believers or those from different faith backgrounds. To a modern-day reader, the story of Noah looks, well, a tad ridiculous. A world-wide flood? Please. One dude and his family left to populate the earth after 40 days? Get real. Show me the evidence! What are we to make of the story of Noah? I'll lay out the atheist's claims and then give my response.
There is no scientific evidence for a massive world-wide flood. How could you possibly believe in the story of Noah? Seems all religious people want to do is believe "their book" and ignore actual facts.
Back in the 1500s, there was a man named Martin Luther. He was Catholic, but he disagreed with the Catholic Church on a number of points, which I'm not going to go into here for the sake of time. He started what Protestants call "The Reformation." Catholics call it "The Protestant Revolution" because Martin wasn't looking to reform the Catholic Church; he was looking to revolt and break off on his own path. Once he broke away, we got the Lutheran denomination. One of the beliefs that came out of the Protestant Revolution was Sola Scriptura--the Bible alone. This is where the Bible alone is the sole authority on all things religious. From this, what happened was a very literal interpretation of most things in the Bible by many, but not all, Protestants.
As Catholics, we don't hold to Sola Scriptura for a couple of reasons. One, the early Christians did not have the completed Bible until nearly 400 years after Christ's death and resurrection. If the Bible is the only way they could come to know anything about God or how He wanted His Church established, what did they use? They didn't have the Bible. Also, it isn't biblical. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that the Bible alone is the sole authority on all matters of the faith. The Catholic Church utilizes three things to discern God's truth: The Bible, Tradition (what was handed down to us from the Apostles and the early Church Fathers) and the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. The Magisterium is the teaching authority of the Catholic Church. Guided by the Holy Spirit (as Christ promised), the Magisterium looks at all things--history, science, economics, social sciences, theology, philosophy, etc.--in order to make decisions on how to interpret passages in the Bible or on how we should believe on certain issues.
"It is needful also to make use of Tradition, for not everything can be gotten from sacred Scripture. The holy apostles handed down some things in the Scriptures, other things in Tradition." St. Epiphancius of Salamis (c. A.D 375)
With Sola Scriptura and its (usually) very literal interpretation of the Bible, we get a very literal understanding of Noah's story. For Catholics, things are a little different. The Church does not have a definitive interpretation of Noah's story, meaning that a Catholic doesn't have to take the story as word-for-word literal. Doesn't mean that the story is a lie, it just means that there are other ways to understand it. -
2025-02-08 at 7:15 PM UTC
-
2025-02-08 at 7:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker So you tossed your logic for a Vatican lie.
I'm not God. but yes, I believe in this. not so much the modern Catholic twist since I was introduce to the protestant faith then joined the catholic church, couldn't relate and left it. I pray at home now but yes, I accept Christ. I don't always obey and do get frustrated at times but I come back around.
the world today is an absolute Satanic Circus. people back then usually lived in towns that didn't push equality or DEI. people back then lived in groups of their own in villages of their own outside of Rome where they allowed DEI and "Your God is Your God, Mine is Mine". Rome fell.
Jesus called Canaan's "Dogs". "Oh how Racist of him". but he meant their lifestyle at the time. -
2025-02-08 at 7:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Landy Pamm I'm not God. but yes, I believe in this. not so much the modern Catholic twist since I was introduce to the protestant faith then joined the catholic church, couldn't relate and left it. I pray at home now but yes, I accept Christ. I don't always obey and do get frustrated at times but I come back around.
the world today is an absolute Satanic Circus. people back then usually lived in towns that didn't push equality or DEI. people back then lived in groups of their own in villages of their own outside of Rome where they allowed DEI and "Your God is Your God, Mine is Mine". Rome fell.
Jesus called Canaan's "Dogs". "Oh how Racist of him". but he meant their lifestyle at the time.
Enjoy the hole on the ground you big fat ostrich. -
2025-02-08 at 7:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ That is a total lie. There is a shit ton of direct evidence worldwide of a global flood.
There are rocks on mountains with sea shells embedded in them or some shit, i've seen them with my own eyes but it's pretty easily explained by science and glacier pangea ice flows and the sea level over time and they would probably still look at any "God floods the earth" person like they are crazy.
I'm gonna have to defer to William "Nye" on this one
-
2025-02-08 at 7:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood There is no scientific evidence for a massive world-wide flood.
Tell it to the Smithsonian
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/evidence-for-a-flood-102813115/ -
2025-02-08 at 7:36 PM UTCUSAID funding stopped.
