User Controls

Are you looking forward to the big war with Iran?

  1. RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Moar wars not in America! Let's go time to ramp it up America needs more money as usual.

    Time to pillage and loot under the guise of policing the world let's goooooo
  2. Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina wrong,

    41.88

    wrong 41.883
  3. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Donald Trump

    those damn BRAZILIANS
  4. ner vegas African Astronaut
    israel's bombed the Iranian consulate in Syria...
  5. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by ner vegas israel's bombed the Iranian consulate in Syria…

    ...and killed one of their main generalisimos...
  6. sheit botta pop off
  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Iranian_consulate_airstrike_in_Damascus#Target

    Looks like they hit a building on the embassy grounds. It's getting described as a "consulate", but a consulate would normally refer to a smaller diplomatic office that either isn't regarded as a full diplomatic mission (which is what is meant by embassy) or is located in a different city to the main embassy.

    They apparently used 6 missiles, fired from F35s. That plane was designed solely for jedi use apparently. If you look at how it was designed, it was perfectly made for the sort of thing they like to do, small sneaky targeted operations. Probably useless in a real war.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Donald Trump https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Iranian_consulate_airstrike_in_Damascus#Target

    Looks like they hit a building on the embassy grounds. It's getting described as a "consulate", but a consulate would normally refer to a smaller diplomatic office that either isn't regarded as a full diplomatic mission (which is what is meant by embassy) or is located in a different city to the main embassy.

    They apparently used 6 missiles, fired from F35s. That plane was designed solely for jedi use apparently. If you look at how it was designed, it was perfectly made for the sort of thing they like to do, small sneaky targeted operations. Probably useless in a real war.

    That would be an accurate assessment. The plane is the most over-hyped and over-budget thing ever...anywhere. and all that over-budgeting is going right into some kikes pocket
  9. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by infinityshock That would be an accurate assessment. The plane is the most over-hyped and over-budget thing ever…anywhere. and all that over-budgeting is going right into some kikes pocket

    latest GAO report has them at 20-50% combat readiness depending on variant, largely because the manufacturer refuses to release a lot of technical data to the military and grifts hard for spare parts with massive lead times

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23989425-gao-23-105341?responsive=1&title=1 - appendix 3
  10. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Donald Trump https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Iranian_consulate_airstrike_in_Damascus#Target

    Looks like they hit a building on the embassy grounds. It's getting described as a "consulate", but a consulate would normally refer to a smaller diplomatic office that either isn't regarded as a full diplomatic mission (which is what is meant by embassy) or is located in a different city to the main embassy.

    They apparently used 6 missiles, fired from F35s. That plane was designed solely for jedi use apparently. If you look at how it was designed, it was perfectly made for the sort of thing they like to do, small sneaky targeted operations. Probably useless in a real war.

    it's literally pressed up against the Canadian embassy too
  11. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by ner vegas latest GAO report has them at 20-50% combat readiness depending on variant, largely because the manufacturer refuses to release a lot of technical data to the military and grifts hard for spare parts with massive lead times

    https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23989425-gao-23-105341?responsive=1&title=1 - appendix 3

    That...and half the advertised capabilities are nowhere near what the manufacturer claimed. There's an article somewhere saying that the cost of an F35 is too high to be used in actual combat.

    Look at the ones who run the program and who receive the profits: they're hebes.

    The entirety of the F35 program directors need to be literally arrested for the literal epitome of fraud, waste, and abuse violations.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by ner vegas it's literally pressed up against the Canadian embassy too

    Diplomatic embassies are supposed to be outside of the valid or legal targets in warfare
  13. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by infinityshock Diplomatic embassies are supposed to be outside of the valid or legal targets in warfare

    sure, but the point there is that the Iranian and Canadian embassies are so close to each other that attacking one could've easily damaged the other, the whole idea is insanely reckless.

    I don't think there's any other takeaway than israel (or more specifically Bibi) is extremely desperate and again, insanely reckless. they need to escalate the war and draw in 'allies' because of how poorly it's going for them; there's no other explanation for this level of escalation combined with the possibility for collateral damage and unpredictable results aside from them feeling like they have little to lose
  14. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by ner vegas sure, but the point there is that the Iranian and Canadian embassies are so close to each other that attacking one could've easily damaged the other, the whole idea is insanely reckless.

    I don't think there's any other takeaway than israel (or more specifically Bibi) is extremely desperate and again, insanely reckless. they need to escalate the war and draw in 'allies' because of how poorly it's going for them; there's no other explanation for this level of escalation combined with the possibility for collateral damage and unpredictable results aside from them feeling like they have little to lose

    This is normal kike behavior. This is the shit they've done throughout history. They are not strategic or abstract thinkers...they function out of what delusions in their head seem like a good idea and what they think might be the results of their actions with little to no forethought to what happens four or five steps ahead in the game.

    Same as the chinee.

    This is exactly the same bullshit for why the babylonians and romans wiped them out.
  15. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by ner vegas sure, but the point there is that the Iranian and Canadian embassies are so close to each other that attacking one could've easily damaged the other, the whole idea is insanely reckless.

    I don't think there's any other takeaway than israel (or more specifically Bibi) is extremely desperate and again, insanely reckless. they need to escalate the war and draw in 'allies' because of how poorly it's going for them; there's no other explanation for this level of escalation combined with the possibility for collateral damage and unpredictable results aside from them feeling like they have little to lose

    the more that I think about this, the more it seems that israel is intentionally trying to draw Iran into open warfare explicitly because they believe it'll force the US to enter the war on their side. they could not win a conventional war with Iran and even with their nuclear weapons the outcome would be questionable and devastating for both sides, regardless of who 'wins'.

    if we understand this to be the goal and assume Iran understands the same, their next step will likely be either massive attacks on israeli assets outside of israel or giving more modern weapons (such as hypersonics) to allies and Shia militias, perhaps Yemen gets the latest ASBMs since they're already at war anyway. maybe Iran closes the Persian Gulf to states supporting israel in co-operation with Yemen. Maybe Hezbullah starts using long-range 'stealth' cruise missiles.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Originally posted by ner vegas the more that I think about this, the more it seems that israel is intentionally trying to draw Iran into open warfare explicitly because they believe it'll force the US to enter the war on their side.

    Mike Enoch has been saying this for a while.

    Putting myself in the position of the Israels I can absolute see myself wanting to trigger WW3 and have the goyim destroy each other and the world so I can rule over the ashes.
  17. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Donald Trump Mike Enoch has been saying this for a while.

    Putting myself in the position of the Israels I can absolute see myself wanting to trigger WW3 and have the goyim destroy each other and the world so I can rule over the ashes.

    yeah, just in general they've been trying for a long time. the reason they keep threatening to go north into Lebanon or push Rafah but never actually do seems to be that they know they won't succeed alone, but Iran and pals have been very careful with escalation control to try to make sure the US doesn't have justification to enter directly.

    to be honest at this point I don't think the US has the stomach for it short of major loss of US lives, like Pearl Harbour or 9/11.
  18. ner vegas African Astronaut
    I mean previously I thought their method would be to engineer a situation where they could say that Iran attacked them unprovoked, but at this point they seem desperate enough to attack first, get hit, then go crying to Uncle Shlomo that Iran is bullying them for no reason.
  19. Warcry Certified lover boy
    go fuck yourself.
  20. Originally posted by ner vegas yeah, just in general they've been trying for a long time. the reason they keep threatening to go north into Lebanon or push Rafah but never actually do seems to be that they know they won't succeed alone, but Iran and pals have been very careful with escalation control to try to make sure the US doesn't have justification to enter directly.

    to be honest at this point I don't think the US has the stomach for it short of major loss of US lives, like Pearl Harbour or 9/11.

    They're trying to wear down Lebanon the same way they did Gaza. Once upon a time Gaza was one of the most famous cities in the middle east. The jedis wanted it, but literally couldn't conquer it the way they did other towns like Ashkelon, it was too wealthy and powerful. That's why so many Palestinians from other towns wound up there, and why Gaza and "refugee camp" (actually cities) became synonymous.

    The jedis wore it down and eventually, aided by a false flag massacre (it's now well accepted they blew up their own music festival) they took it over.

    Originally posted by ner vegas I mean previously I thought their method would be to engineer a situation where they could say that Iran attacked them unprovoked, but at this point they seem desperate enough to attack first, get hit, then go crying to Uncle Shlomo that Iran is bullying them for no reason.

    That seems likely. They'll start the war off with a big loss in order to play the victim and get world jediery on side.
Jump to Top