User Controls
Putin Just mentioned Tucker Carlson's CIA history
-
2024-02-09 at 5:23 AM UTCOperation Mockingbird never ended. It's still active.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-02-09 at 5:24 AM UTC
-
2024-02-09 at 5:30 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-02-09 at 5:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by CandyRein I’ve thought that for a long while now …they make the attention span short by making everything quick …
So when you don’t get the info your brain is wanting within 20-30 seconds..people just don’t pay attention after that
there's no argument that it's been happening, the question is just whether it's intentional or not I guess.
I mean from a purely capitalist standpoint trying to produce a product that will sell to the most people means tapping into the most common, basic desires - things like sex, desire for power or status, a sense of belonging, or more specifically things that create a dopamine or seratonin response - things that almost all people commonly want, so you maximise the market for your product.
then, once you can target that specific response you start trying to find ways to trigger it with the minimum possible effort and resource cost. fentanyl's a perfect example - on the individual level there's almost no-one who doesn't (or wouldn't) enjoy it, it's highly addictive, and given its low volume vs effects it's much cheaper in terms of manufacture and logistics, which is why it's displaced heroin and most other drugs in market share.
the reason that governments fight against it is that even though it's a perfect product on the personal level, it's highly destructive on the social level. we're coming to a point where states will be forced to realise that these drugs and parasocial social tools have similar large-scale effects, and will have to decide how (or whether) to deal with themThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-02-09 at 7:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by CandyRein I’ve thought that for a long while now …they make the attention span short by making everything quick …
So when you don’t get the info your brain is wanting within 20-30 seconds..people just don’t pay attention after that
says the knee girl whose habbit is to post 5-10 seconds clips of her various mundane, sexually charged activities. -
2024-02-09 at 7:45 AM UTCYou watching ..and gone keep on watching..loll
-
2024-02-09 at 7:52 AM UTCi have all the bandwidth hogging gifs ublocked.
-
2024-02-09 at 7:53 AM UTC
-
2024-02-09 at 9:14 AM UTCI haven't watched it yet, but apparently it's an autistic history lesson.
-
2024-02-09 at 9:18 AM UTChe literally says he's going to give a quick 60 second rundown and then talks about the history of Russia-Ukraine for like 15 minutes straight
-
2024-02-09 at 9:32 AM UTC
-
2024-02-09 at 9:58 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-02-09 at 2:02 PM UTCi watched it and i find it funny tucker would use feminine terms like "bitter" and "resent" or some womenly feeling to describe what putin probably feel when he was rejected by NATO.
it truly is unsettling to see "professional" "journalist" uses these feminine terms as a part of serious commentary about serious world leaders.
the moment i heard that i fely like i just want to aggressively unzip a man, any man within my arms length, pull out his dick and suck it.
it was that gay for me. -
2024-02-09 at 2:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i watched it and i find it funny tucker would use feminine terms like "bitter" and "resent" or some womenly feeling to describe what putin probably feel when he was rejected by NATO.
it truly is unsettling to see "professional" "journalist" uses these feminine terms as a part of serious commentary about serious world leaders.
the moment i heard that i fely like i just want to aggressively unzip a man, any man within my arms length, pull out his dick and suck it.
it was that gay for me.
I have a dick you can suck -
2024-02-09 at 2:28 PM UTC
-
2024-02-09 at 2:31 PM UTCPutin doesn't know history at all, he only reads books written by Russian skitzos that the entire world laughs at. The dude lives in a fake reality propped up by other deluded faggots
SIR! THESE BOOKS ARE FULL OF SHIT
Oh sorry I can't hear you ACROSS THE VAST RUSSIAN STEPPES actually father saint spyridon says the bible considers all of earth to be the homeland of the Russians so YOU'RE WRONG YOU NAZI!!!!
tucker better keep is polonium poisoning kit handy -
2024-02-09 at 5:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i watched it and i find it funny tucker would use feminine terms like "bitter" and "resent" or some womenly feeling to describe what putin probably feel when he was rejected by NATO.
it truly is unsettling to see "professional" "journalist" uses these feminine terms as a part of serious commentary about serious world leaders.
the moment i heard that i fely like i just want to aggressively unzip a man, any man within my arms length, pull out his dick and suck it.
it was that gay for me.
Quoted. -
2024-02-09 at 6:33 PM UTC
-
2024-02-09 at 6:37 PM UTCI updated with the clip.
There's also a part where Tucker asks who blew up Nord stream and Putin jokes that Tucker did it. Then says maybe he has an alibi personally but the CIA doesn't. I think Putin knows something about Tucker that we don't.
But it's interesting to see the American media react to it. He talked about Elon Musk being smart (not sure I agree) but that the government needed to control him. CNN's takeaway from the entire interview was that Putin thinks Elon Musk is smart 🙄 and they left out the part I just posted. Why? They don't like Tucker right? Ig because they're all a team and it doesn't fit their narrative. -
2024-02-09 at 6:41 PM UTCThe CIA bit is at 46minutes.
Putin was a bit rude when he points out that Tucker failed to get in to the intelligence agencies, while he did. Tucker could have salvaged it by saying something like "that's what we wanted you to think" or "this line of work pays better". But I don't blame him for not bringing the bants.
