User Controls
Are you looking forward to the big war with Iran?
-
2024-01-30 at 5:07 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-01-30 at 5:28 PM UTC
-
2024-01-30 at 5:51 PM UTCconflicting 'leaks':
1. there are plans for a US ground invasion of Iran from Iraq
2. US has sent a message through back channels (Swiss embassy) telling Iran not to respond to what's coming and escalate further
if scenario #1 is true, a ground invasion would not happen immediately, a massive air operation would be required first. refuelers and heavy cargo planes have been tracked moving from the US mainland, to Europe, to the Middle East, but this alone does not indicate an operation is being prepared.
if scenario #2 is true, it implies that the US 'response' will be largely symbolic. this would probably be the more reasonable course of action if only to placate the dangerous retards in congress but US policy has never been 'reasonable', especially when it comes to israel. Iran has already stated publicly that it will respond militarily to any direct strike on its personnel or territory.
I've seen it suggested that the US is likely to attack an Iranian naval ship, specifically one of the ones that appear to be helping co-ordinate the Yemeni blockade, and this seems likely to me as the US considers it less provocative than a direct attack on Iranian territory. Iran will, however, respond and escalate further.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-01-30 at 6:06 PM UTCI suspect there's a major conflict going in within the US leadership between people who want to go hard and kick off another major war for israel and others who see that they're in no position to do that at the moment and that it'd make things significantly worse for everyone.
the former group has been dominant since WWII. -
2024-01-30 at 6:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by ner vegas conflicting 'leaks':
1. there are plans for a US ground invasion of Iran from Iraq
2. US has sent a message through back channels (Swiss embassy) telling Iran not to respond to what's coming and escalate further
if scenario #1 is true, a ground invasion would not happen immediately, a massive air operation would be required first. refuelers and heavy cargo planes have been tracked moving from the US mainland, to Europe, to the Middle East, but this alone does not indicate an operation is being prepared.
if scenario #2 is true, it implies that the US 'response' will be largely symbolic. this would probably be the more reasonable course of action if only to placate the dangerous retards in congress but US policy has never been 'reasonable', especially when it comes to israel. Iran has already stated publicly that it will respond militarily to any direct strike on its personnel or territory.
I've seen it suggested that the US is likely to attack an Iranian naval ship, specifically one of the ones that appear to be helping co-ordinate the Yemeni blockade, and this seems likely to me as the US considers it less provocative than a direct attack on Iranian territory. Iran will, however, respond and escalate further.
In reality there has never been a reason for the US to have Iran as an enemy. They're not even real muslims. Hell...they have almost as much western/ nato weaponry as nato does from when they were allied with the west.
The sole reasoning behind Iran being a 'threat' to the US/west is because of the kikes in elected positions directing American doctrine against Iran because of israeli/kike motivation. -
2024-01-30 at 7:47 PM UTCLol even the families of the dead soldiers don't want international conflict. Nobody wants this, America needs to fuck off and get a life and legalize cocaine and focus on their own issues instead of being world police.
That's why nobody cries/cares when Americans die, same thing with Israel. This is karma. -
2024-01-31 at 1:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost Lol even the families of the dead soldiers don't want international conflict. Nobody wants this, America needs to fuck off and get a life and legalize cocaine and focus on their own issues instead of being world police.
That's why nobody cries/cares when Americans die, same thing with Israel. This is karma.
remember...'america' does not equal americans. all major decisions are made by jews, either elected or in positions they purchased, masquerading as real americans -
2024-01-31 at 4:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by ner vegas conflicting 'leaks':
1. there are plans for a US ground invasion of Iran from Iraq
2. US has sent a message through back channels (Swiss embassy) telling Iran not to respond to what's coming and escalate further
if scenario #1 is true, a ground invasion would not happen immediately, a massive air operation would be required first. refuelers and heavy cargo planes have been tracked moving from the US mainland, to Europe, to the Middle East, but this alone does not indicate an operation is being prepared.
if scenario #2 is true, it implies that the US 'response' will be largely symbolic. this would probably be the more reasonable course of action if only to placate the dangerous retards in congress but US policy has never been 'reasonable', especially when it comes to israel. Iran has already stated publicly that it will respond militarily to any direct strike on its personnel or territory.
I've seen it suggested that the US is likely to attack an Iranian naval ship, specifically one of the ones that appear to be helping co-ordinate the Yemeni blockade, and this seems likely to me as the US considers it less provocative than a direct attack on Iranian territory. Iran will, however, respond and escalate further.
these "leaks" are meant for sheeples and the unwashed masses without any logic or understanding of how the military works.
an "invasion" in its proper sense of the word isnt possible within this short amount of time unless it involves a night time uncle-visit that involves a few heli-cope-ters with some spec ops going in for a few hours to kill some specific targets and get out before dawn.
a real invasion will take at least a few months of planning and another to get the ass-sets in place. -
2024-01-31 at 4:23 AM UTC
-
2024-01-31 at 4:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny these "leaks" are meant for sheeples and the unwashed masses without any logic or understanding of how the military works.
an "invasion" in its proper sense of the word isnt possible within this short amount of time unless it involves a night time uncle-visit that involves a few heli-cope-ters with some spec ops going in for a few hours to kill some specific targets and get out before dawn.
a real invasion will take at least a few months of planning and another to get the ass-sets in place.
nobody said it was going to happen tomorrow, retard -
2024-01-31 at 4:46 AM UTC
-
2024-01-31 at 5 AM UTCwhat are you even suggesting? a contingency that needs to be planned for months ahead of time doesn't have plans that could be leaked?
retardation aside, I predict the US will attack a ship or IRGC base, which will lead to uncontrollable escalation, which will give the j'ews cover to do even more heinous things than they already are.
it's possible some of the US force planners know that any strike on Iranian targets will lead to rapid escalation and will require the eventual use of a massive air campaign and possible ground campaign, and have planned accordingly.
as well as the massive damage to the middle east, this will also tear the US apart internally. -
2024-01-31 at 7:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by ner vegas what are you even suggesting? a contingency that needs to be planned for months ahead of time doesn't have plans that could be leaked?
well durr, the US isnt run by a bunch of women who leak involuntarily each and every months. at worst, its being run by niggers and trannies.
what im saying is that, these leaks are all engineered leaks, engineered to achieve a specific list of goals militarily, politically, and usually both.
the above mentioned "leaks" are obvioulsy meant to be a giant pacifier for all the armchair neocons and baby warhawks domiciled in the US. as more and more of these armchair neocons are clamouring for reaction to the alleged "iranian" "attacks" these leaks of "retaliation" in progress are certainly meant to put these clamouring babies to sleep by guaranteeing some "secret surprises" are coming and the first rule of this "secret surprise" is that we dont talk about the "secret surprise".
in other words this is just an attempt to buy time while they figure out what to do and hopefully the problem will go away on its own and be forgotten by election time. -
2024-01-31 at 7:25 AM UTCand no, like i said earlier, they gonna be needing some stepping stone before moving into iran, and yemen or lebanon, or both, would be it.
-
2024-01-31 at 8:07 AM UTC
-
2024-01-31 at 8:28 AM UTCI remember the invasion of Iraq in 2003, they were stacking troops for months before they went in. Invading another country on the other side of the world is a lot of logistical effort, you can't just YOLO it. And Iraq just sat by doing nothing while the yanks stacked goyims, I don't think the Iranians would do the same thing.
Meanwhile everyone who isn't a jedi would be like "why are we doing this retard rodeo again?" -
2024-01-31 at 8:51 AM UTCi barely remember it donald. i was like a junior in a us high school back then. poland was jsut a pipe dream at the time a place i rmemeber growing up at.
-
2024-01-31 at 9:11 AM UTCJohn Conflict
-
2024-01-31 at 9:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny well durr, the US isnt run by a bunch of women who leak involuntarily each and every months. at worst, its being run by niggers and trannies.
what im saying is that, these leaks are all engineered leaks, engineered to achieve a specific list of goals militarily, politically, and usually both.
the above mentioned "leaks" are obvioulsy meant to be a giant pacifier for all the armchair neocons and baby warhawks domiciled in the US. as more and more of these armchair neocons are clamouring for reaction to the alleged "iranian" "attacks" these leaks of "retaliation" in progress are certainly meant to put these clamouring babies to sleep by guaranteeing some "secret surprises" are coming and the first rule of this "secret surprise" is that we dont talk about the "secret surprise".
in other words this is just an attempt to buy time while they figure out what to do and hopefully the problem will go away on its own and be forgotten by election time.
they're both perfectly reasonable, rejecting them out of hand is just as dumb as uncritically believing them -
2024-01-31 at 1:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump I remember the invasion of Iraq in 2003, they were stacking troops for months before they went in. Invading another country on the other side of the world is a lot of logistical effort, you can't just YOLO it. And Iraq just sat by doing nothing while the yanks stacked goyims, I don't think the Iranians would do the same thing.
Meanwhile everyone who isn't a jedi would be like "why are we doing this retard rodeo again?"
saddam was old and living in denial he couldnt believe it that the US could invade another country with cooked up BS while the world did nothing but watched in glee.
iran learnt that lesson.
