Another retarded charge in Poland is attempting to have sex with a minor because what if you use code words like do you wanna have some fun and they get turned against you because saying fun could be interpreted in so many ways but what if she tells her parent son you but how can they prove what you meant by fun? It’s w dumb charge. Also what if you say do you like older guys? She says yes and you say I like girls your age. And then you ask her do you want to do something with this attraction we have for one another. Would this even be a crime just asking not forcing her? If so it’s w retarded law ino.
This is why Poland has gone to the birds. It’s too westernised now and the obsession on sex and laws is almost as bad as California despite it supposedly being a western and former Russian territory country.
welcome to 2024, with one button press you can put on a VR goggles headset and watch a fully 3D first person perspective AI generated rape scene of a toddler being brutalized that is so realistic you would think you are watching an actual recording of a crime taking place
I don’t understand people who want to see toddlers or little kids raped. But porn with girls consentual or who are into sex or those cam whores for instance or girls 12/13 who enjoy the attention. I don’t see how that can be out in the same category as toddlers. Ie prostitute or whatever but not kidnapped etc.
Originally posted by Warcry
By trying to teach todays youth about age play and how acceptable it was just a few decades back in our time and still is in much of the world like the check republic or makers of oldje its educational for them.
that is literally the definition of grooming
Originally posted by Warcry
I don’t understand people who want to see toddlers or little kids raped. But porn with girls consentual or who are into sex or those ćma whores for instance or girls 12/13 who enjoy the attention. I don’t see how that can be out in the same category as toddlers.
you should call the ACLU and get them to represent your claim that not being allowed to send children pornography violates your free speech
Originally posted by Warcry
I don’t understand people who want to see toddlers or little kids raped. But porn with girls consentual or who are into sex or those ćma whores for instance or girls 12/13 who enjoy the attention. I don’t see how that can be out in the same category as toddlers.
the AI will spit out any age you want and it can generate them doing anything a persons desires
in 10 years I imagine we will have the technology to create full length feature films with an AI prompt that are studio quality. THe flip side of that is every porn site will use the same technology.
If they make any arrests for porn to weed weirdos out of society they should only go for those i to toddlers or kids 8 and under in all reality and make everything else menacing not kidnapping rowing or whatever but looking at stuff just as a viewer just like it is in Russia legal.
And even then I don’t see how they should make the low age sillegal if the person wasn’t specifically only looking for those ages but say 12/13 but the sites were filled with those weirdos or catered to them.
still i mean how are you gonna charge someone for both embedding a video or image to a chick and simply sending her a link telling her to check out because in that sense she probably should know what shes clicking on or its her chocie to click it especially if you dont decerive her but let her know or give hint what it is and thirdly same charge to someone who simply alluides to porn or says dot com but doesnt hyperlink i mean so many variables thats why its retarded for it to even be a charge.
grooming as a charge is retarde dbecause anything can be interpreted as this. who knows what someone wants or their goal is during a communicaiton besides the perosn himself and even then just hacving a goal and achieving it are two diff things.
it's kinda the same argument for drugs being illegal "If all drugs were legal there would be no drug crime!" which is true but also that market would have to go somewhere but the implications from that are much easier to sleep with than sex crimes.
I don't support laws of any kind but only because I think there are law greater like giving parents a gun and letting them judge for themselves instead of relying on courts for justice
if they really care about protecting the children then why would they make a serious effort to ban and prevent AI from making child pornography without involvine children at all ?
by barring AI from making ethical cgild pornographies that dont involve children it left minor attracted peepuh with no choice but to turn to traditional, actor ad actress-based child pornography.
which, according to these good samaritans, will cause permament and everlasting hurt to the children involved.
they promote beyond meat as a kinder, more ethical and humane alternative to meat and i say its time we promote Beyond Child child pornography as a kinder, more ethical and humane alternative fap material for minor attracted peepuh.
