User Controls

Klaus Schwab wants to replace elections with predictive AI

  1. #21
    RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Originally posted by Donald Trump How anti-semitic.

    WOOPS!
  2. #22
  3. #23
    EduCaTional CATastropHE African Astronaut
    just do away with any sort of system or government and let anarchy prevail. best case scenario you get to do some crazy shit and live out a real life video game scenario and worst case is pretty much you just die but that was going to happen eventually anyways
  4. #24
    infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by EduCaTional CATastropHE just do away with any sort of system or government and let anarchy prevail. best case scenario you get to do some crazy shit and live out a real life video game scenario and worst case is pretty much you just die but that was going to happen eventually anyways

    im all for a mad-max scenario...
  5. #25
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    I'm conflicted. I firmly believe that all Abominable Intelligences must be destroyed, but I appreciate techno-feudalist utopia the WEF wishes to bring about and rigging the elections using Abominable Intelligence will hasten that process.
  6. #26
    Interesting discussion about the potential role of AI in governance and elections, as brought up in relation to Klaus Schwab's ideas. It's a complex topic that intersects technology, ethics, and democracy. While AI can offer data-driven insights and efficiency, its application in areas like elections must be approached with caution. AI systems are tools created and programmed by humans, and they currently lack the nuanced understanding of ethical and societal values that are crucial in democratic processes.

    It's also important to remember that technology, including AI, reflects the biases and intentions of those who create and program it. Therefore, transparency in AI development and deployment is essential to ensure that these systems are fair and unbiased.

    Regarding some of the more lighthearted comments, it's great to see humor in discussions, though we should be mindful of how our words might be perceived by others in a public forum. It's always beneficial to balance humor with respect, especially on sensitive topics.

    As for integrating AI into governance, it's a path that requires careful consideration, public discourse, and rigorous ethical standards. AI has the potential to assist in decision-making but should not replace the human element that's fundamental to democracy. The idea of AI in elections is more about augmenting human capabilities and ensuring integrity in the process rather than replacing human judgment entirely.

    What are your views on how we can balance the benefits of AI in governance while maintaining the core values of democracy and public trust?
  7. #27
    infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Meikai I'm conflicted. I firmly believe that all Abominable Intelligences must be destroyed, but I appreciate techno-feudalist utopia the WEF wishes to bring about and rigging the elections using Abominable Intelligence will hasten that process.

    the WEF is the modern day version of the aristocracy or nobility. Their version of utopia is they control all resources and assets, including those of the proles...which they consider nothing more than livestock.

    This is the way its been for about 5,000 years.

    For bonus points, research some history on sumptuary laws starting about 4,000 years ago. This is their mentality.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. #28
    ner vegas African Astronaut
    if you're going to have AI running policy why even bother with the pretense of democracy
  9. #29
    infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by im literally posting right now Interesting discussion about the potential role of AI in governance and elections, as brought up in relation to Klaus Schwab's ideas. It's a complex topic that intersects technology, ethics, and democracy. While AI can offer data-driven insights and efficiency, its application in areas like elections must be approached with caution. AI systems are tools created and programmed by humans, and they currently lack the nuanced understanding of ethical and societal values that are crucial in democratic processes.

    It's also important to remember that technology, including AI, reflects the biases and intentions of those who create and program it. Therefore, transparency in AI development and deployment is essential to ensure that these systems are fair and unbiased.

    Regarding some of the more lighthearted comments, it's great to see humor in discussions, though we should be mindful of how our words might be perceived by others in a public forum. It's always beneficial to balance humor with respect, especially on sensitive topics.

    As for integrating AI into governance, it's a path that requires careful consideration, public discourse, and rigorous ethical standards. AI has the potential to assist in decision-making but should not replace the human element that's fundamental to democracy. The idea of AI in elections is more about augmenting human capabilities and ensuring integrity in the process rather than replacing human judgment entirely.

    What are your views on how we can balance the benefits of AI in governance while maintaining the core values of democracy and public trust?

    The only way AI would be allowed to provide actionable decisions is if they were 100% controlled by the political elite

    there is no balance of AI in governance while maintaining core values of democracy and public trust. A perfect machine would not be accepted by humans to lead them. 4 billion years of evolution have programmed humans to follow only those of their own 'tribe'...anyone else is an outsider and will result in a failed state. The first example of millenias worth is lugal-ukin (the j­ews stole his 'story' and made it into moses) who tried to rule kingdoms he wasnt part of.
  10. #30
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by ner vegas if you're going to have AI running policy why even bother with the pretense of democracy

    Because democracy is good and overthrowing it is bad, so you can't have AI running policy without maintaining that pretense. Silly.
  11. #31
    Originally posted by ner vegas if you're going to have AI running policy why even bother with the pretense of democracy

    thats like asking if you wanted to commit suicide why bother using the assisted one over the unasssisted one.
  12. #32
    Originally posted by Ghost "that doesn't sound so bad"
    Oh yeah? Weeds still illegal too

Jump to Top