User Controls
Military Genius Zelensky wants Ukrainians to throw molotovs at Russian tanks
-
2023-05-07 at 5:42 AM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 9:58 AM UTCWags got reinforced, ammo and support, and they're getting Surovikin too lmao
It might've been a psyop from the start but it went so much better for them than could have been expected. -
2023-05-07 at 10:28 AM UTCyour a retard. all those months and they still havent captured it and are now just waiting for the counter offense. yea went os well for them…
-
2023-05-07 at 10:31 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2023-05-07 at 11:12 AM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 11:12 AM UTChow bout navalny? oh yea they tried tompoison him and outin had him thrown in prison on trumped up chRges.
-
2023-05-07 at 12:06 PM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 1:23 PM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 2:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra nobody poisoned him
you should actually look at what he was charged with and his criminal history, then ask yourself what any other country would do
He was charged with using his anti corruption organization to fund his mayoral/ presidential ambitions. It's funny that he was considered so valiant for fighting corruption in Russia but then the narrative was that he should be given a free pass on corruption because he's in Russia. Regardless, it's not corruption on a massive scale or anything but people should know he's crooked and self interested -
2023-05-07 at 2:57 PM UTCI didn't read this thread in 15 years but is anyone still heavy on the cope and refusing to admit the Ukraine invasion wasn't executed with a 3 stooges like intensity taking a year and a half to become an international pariah, deplete their own resources, reveal their hand to be sweaty and shakey, exacerbate their demographic issues all in the name of gaining no significant territory and making it extremely difficult to declare victory with such mounting losses?
Literal Ukraine is making Russia its bitch. They can't even protect their daughters from wariat but they can protect their interior from Russia -
2023-05-07 at 3:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo I didn't read this thread in 15 years but is anyone still heavy on the cope and refusing to admit the Ukraine invasion wasn't executed with a 3 stooges like intensity taking a year and a half to become an international pariah, deplete their own resources, reveal their hand to be sweaty and shakey, exacerbate their demographic issues all in the name of gaining no significant territory and making it extremely difficult to declare victory with such mounting losses?
Literal Ukraine is making Russia its bitch. They can't even protect their daughters from wariat but they can protect their interior from Russia
yes, you still don't seem to understand either side's goal and are haemmorhaging buzzwords -
2023-05-07 at 3:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yes, you still don't understand either side's goal
Are you saying Russias goal is to isolate themselves geopolitically/international financially, fuck up their demographics, reveal their equipment is last gen, gain no territory and a laundry list of other public embarrassments so they can say "look Ukraine didn't join NATO until 2 months after we left so thr end justified the means?"
That's moving goalposts which is fake and gay. If you compare to pretty much any other conflict this is a lost war of attrition and Russia has suffered far more than Ukraine has, in human, financial and international clout coats.
Please tell me how you can frame this as anything other than Russia refusing to pull away from a lost battle because they're afraid of what will happen when they do. -
2023-05-07 at 3:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo Are you saying Russias goal is to isolate themselves geopolitically/international financially,
has been beneficial to their economy by all metrics.
Originally posted by Sudo fuck up their demographics,
irrelevant to the war unless you believe the ridiculous casualty numbers given by the Ukrainian government
Originally posted by Sudo reveal their equipment is last gen,
what?
Originally posted by Sudo gain no territory and a laundry list of other public embarrassments so they can say "look Ukraine didn't join NATO until 2 months after we left so thr end justified the means?"
why do you think territory is important? of course the AFU has to take territory at the cost of men in order to keep the weapons and money flowing from its benefactors, but Russia is far more concerned with degrading the AFU with as little loss of life and equipment as possible because after a certain point, the AFU won't have the capability to hold territory so previous claims are moot.
Originally posted by Sudo If you compare to pretty much any other conflict this is a lost war of attrition and Russia has suffered far more than Ukraine has, in human, financial and international clout coats.
LOL. do you seriously believe this? even if you don't believe casualty numbers coming from either side, it's taught in military academies that 75% of casualties in modern ground warfare come from artillery. both sides, along with most countries with modern militaries agree on this. Russia is firing roughly 10x the artillery the AFU is per day, from better artillery (and MLRS) units with better-trained crews. realistically it's likely that the AFU is losing the casualty race at around 4-5:1.
Russia initially deployed around 150,000 (of their 800,000-1,000,000 standing army) troops to the SMO, mostly standoff weapons and operators, and relied heavily on the LDNR units and Wagner for frontline operations. They then mobilised 300,000 reservists and veterans - these were NOT drawn from their standing army - who are mostly not currently at the front lines.
even if all forces inside the Ukraine were totally obliterated somehow, there are still a bare minimum of 600,000 troops held in reserve including tank units and the strategic missile forces. -
2023-05-07 at 4:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra has been beneficial to their economy by all metrics.
irrelevant to the war unless you believe the ridiculous casualty numbers given by the Ukrainian government
what?
why do you think territory is important? of course the AFU has to take territory at the cost of men in order to keep the weapons and money flowing from its benefactors, but Russia is far more concerned with degrading the AFU with as little loss of life and equipment as possible because after a certain point, the AFU won't have the capability to hold territory so previous claims are moot.
LOL. do you seriously believe this? even if you don't believe casualty numbers coming from either side, it's taught in military academies that 75% of casualties in modern ground warfare come from artillery. both sides, along with most countries with modern militaries agree on this. Russia is firing roughly 10x the artillery the AFU is per day, from better artillery (and MLRS) units with better-trained crews. realistically it's likely that the AFU is losing the casualty race at around 4-5:1.
Russia initially deployed around 150,000 (of their 800,000-1,000,000 standing army) troops to the SMO, mostly standoff weapons and operators, and relied heavily on the LDNR units and Wagner for frontline operations. They then mobilised 300,000 reservists and veterans - these were NOT drawn from their standing army - who are mostly not currently at the front lines.
even if all forces inside the Ukraine were totally obliterated somehow, there are still a bare minimum of 600,000 troops held in reserve including tank units and the strategic missile forces.
⬆️Wants to have Putin's babies. -
2023-05-07 at 4:06 PM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 4:18 PM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 4:20 PM UTCyeah, I'm upset, not the guy who has a history of starting and losing fights over 'political disagreements'
-
2023-05-07 at 4:25 PM UTCUkraine mightn't have nukes, but they do have nuclear waste. The fact that they haven't used dirty bombs against Russia by now is deplorable. They could turn Moscow into Pripyat if they tried.
-
2023-05-07 at 4:29 PM UTC
-
2023-05-07 at 4:30 PM UTC
