User Controls
Woke up to my parents swearing at each other.
-
2016-07-11 at 1:28 AM UTC
That's not true. Just a few days ago, I knocked up some 11yo cherokee girl in the library bathroom. My indian warrior blood now flows through her veins, as my semen did through her ovaries.
Vids of pocahontas pls. -
2016-07-11 at 2:19 AM UTC
Reminds me of something I read once. If you think about it, there's an unbroken chain of people who successfully reproduced. They lived long enough to reproduce, and death rates were far far higher back then for multiple reasons, and the cycle has continued for eons until you.
If you don't have children, you'll be the first at the end of an incredible cycle.
I think of this positively, making sure my godforsaken genetic lineage ends here and spitting in the face of biology and evolution (completely vanity since they aren't conscious forces or anything).
Going back far enough, how likely do you think it is you descended from a rape? -
2016-07-11 at 3:52 AM UTCHereditary genoicide. Lineage destroyers. The lasts in line.
-
2016-07-11 at 4:28 AM UTC
Hereditary genoicide. Lineage destroyers. The lasts in line.
Your usertitle should say: Agent Provocateur. -
2016-07-11 at 4:43 AM UTC
Hereditary genoicide. Lineage destroyers. The lasts in line.
-
2016-07-11 at 5:48 AM UTC
Going back far enough, how likely do you think it is you descended from a rape?
It was actually quite common after inter-tribal warfare, which is related to a critical mistake anthropologists have repeatedly made when examining primitive cultures. which was a major factor in what lead to the idea of the "noble savage"; that most murders were from occurred in the outgroup, and which also creates also leads to a false equating from observations of modern isolated hunter gatherers, even those in the earlier in the 1900s, due to that isolation, the lower population density (competition for resources having been a main driver) and related factors cause the observations to be very different from those 10K+ years ago.
The invading/ambushing tribe would abduct women. Napoleon Chagnon has done interesting work, studying the Yanomamo in proximity, which of course hurt the feelings of the leftist ideological cluster that are pussies about these matters. Here's a particularly noteworthy anecdote of their brutality: https://books.google.com/books?id=9YInrVSoa9cC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=yanomamo+bashing+head+against+tree&source=bl&ots=q_qtspES2U&sig=PV3jbYaYo_sufU7t-HPzBWKjG7Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi0s77Q1OrNAhUT-2MKHSWEDFkQ6AEIMTAE#v=onepage&q&f=false
About my own specific heritage, although I'm a genetic clusterfuck, I've wondered whether the history of latin america could account for some factors, the high rate of violence, particularly in certain regions, and the disproportionate number of serial killers with very high kill counts. The basis is that, IIRC, in reality somewhere around 90-95% died from disease, then others from violence. It was found that the Yanomamo men who had killed had significantly more children than those who others, traits being mediated by genetics this could lead to an increasingly violent population, although the concept is too much for sissies to handle or properly comprehend and integrate due to emotional distress. By the same line of reasoning, the Spaniard conquistadors had already had a selection effect for violent traits, and the most prolific rapists along with those higher in the hierarchy, bound to correlate with psychopathic, Machiavellian, and violent traits, having had their pick of captive women, were likely to have had a far greater number of offspring.
So, my answer is, it could be surprisingly recent, for many people. I mean a few hundred years at least. -
2016-07-11 at 11:40 PM UTC
Going back far enough, how likely do you think it is you descended from a rape?
in modern times 'rape' doesnt even mean the same thing it did way-back-when. hell...up until a few decades ago there was no such thing as marital rape.
having sex with a conquest (war, pillaging, etc) was considered a normal means of courtship and completely socially acceptable. the women didnt even fight back. -
2016-07-12 at 12:28 AM UTC
It's not that uncommon, depending on where you live. Particularly with the prospects for college graduates (unemployment, cost of living, income), debt, and mainly the massive surge in housing prices. Lower among the college educated, though, but higher in males.
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/05/24/for-first-time-in-modern-era-living-with-parents-edges-out-other-living-arrangements-for-18-to-34-year-olds/
Yeah! *high five*. It has horrific effects, for certain types, people like me, and I strongly suspect there's a kind of biological trigger that makes women far more likely to develop a desire for children. Something I recall is that data from Pew or the General Social Survey(GSS) (I believe Rasmussen is the final major player, but they focus mainly on public opinion) is that only about 5% of women in their 40s who were married were childless. And who knows how many of those weren't by choice or later deeply regretted it.
Ho, I really should about reading the whole thing, but will try to power thought it. Higher among the Pacific region in the US. I wonder what it is in the bay area, but affluence and higher general intelligence may counteract that, particularly with some of the top universities in the region (Stanford, UC Berkeley).
That's about it. In some Western European cultures it's actually the norm to live at home until marriage, which likely provides the greatest psychological benefit if you aren't cohabiting and serious.
To be fair, marriage is just a piece of paper with some legal merit behind it. I think more and more people are seeing it as such. -
2016-07-12 at 12:49 AM UTCIf you don't get married, your son is legally classed as a bastard child. Or a bitch child, if it's female.
-
2016-07-12 at 7:36 AM UTC
If you don't get married, your son is legally classed as a bastard child. Or a bitch child, if it's female.
US got rid of that whole bullshit and all that remains are some crumbly remnants of state laws which wouldn't hold up in a federal court. I think England still has bastard laws but they'd be legally classed as illegitimate, not a bastard. -
2016-07-12 at 10:07 PM UTCYour son would still feel like a bastard, regardless of the local laws.
-
2016-07-13 at 6:11 AM UTCWhy? Due to societal influence? Co-habitation without marriage is quite common in (some) Nordic countries, Sweden in particular I believe, due to the drastically declining influence of religion and belief in a god.
-
2016-07-13 at 11:34 AM UTC
Why? Due to societal influence? Co-habitation without marriage is quite common in (some) Nordic countries, Sweden in particular I believe, due to the drastically declining influence of religion and belief in a god.
Lingering stigmata, festered and fostered by thousands of years of strict indoctrination. It's almost a telepathic thing now. Ingrained in the psyche. You just have to know when someone's a bastard at some deep, almost undetectable level, and you can't really help that. As a teenager, I would sometimes turn to the kid next to me and ask him if his Mom and Dad are married, but I already knew the answer. -
2016-07-13 at 3:15 PM UTCKids that asked me personal questions about my life in school got a sharpened pencil in the arm/leg/face
-
2016-07-13 at 8:38 PM UTC
Kids that asked me personal questions about my life in school got a sharpened pencil in the arm/leg/face
That only reinforces the idea that no one wants to be revealed as a bastard child. -
2016-07-14 at 10:28 AM UTCSpectral needs his own show on TV where he tries to cope with the world and understand reality.
I don't even.... -
2016-07-14 at 12:48 PM UTC
Spectral needs his own show on TV where he tries to cope with the world and understand reality.
I don't even….
Just so you know, you don't even come close to frightening me.
