User Controls
Military Genius Zelensky wants Ukrainians to throw molotovs at Russian tanks
-
2022-10-10 at 3:38 PM UTC
-
2022-10-10 at 3:41 PM UTC
-
2022-10-10 at 3:44 PM UTC
-
2022-10-10 at 4:02 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-10-10 at 4:09 PM UTC
-
2022-10-10 at 4:15 PM UTC
Impressive footage of cruise missiles hitting thermal plant 5 in Kyiv.
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The Ukrainian people can do anything they want to invading forces or their supporting infrastructure without it being terrorism.
So they are allowed to use terrorism against the invaders, but it's not terrorism because they were invaded? -
2022-10-10 at 5:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump
The word terrorism is so misused by the elite press people are confused as to what it actually is.
Impressive footage of cruise missiles hitting thermal plant 5 in Kyiv.
So they are allowed to use terrorism against the invaders, but it's not terrorism because they were invaded?
They can't use terrorism. Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. When defending against an invading army or one which has committed an act of war violence against said force, it's logistic infrastructure, or even it's sovereign territory is not unlawful. Nor is it in pursuit of political aims against innocent civilians. The Ukrainian people are no more capable of committing acts of terrorism against Russia then the French or Russian resistance organizations were against NAZI Germany. -
2022-10-10 at 8:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The word terrorism is so misused by the elite press people are confused as to what it actually is.
They can't use terrorism. Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. When defending against an invading army or one which has committed an act of war violence against said force, it's logistic infrastructure, or even it's sovereign territory is not unlawful. Nor is it in pursuit of political aims against innocent civilians. The Ukrainian people are no more capable of committing acts of terrorism against Russia then the French or Russian resistance organizations were against NAZI Germany.
Why can't they use terrorism? Terrorism is unlawful in some jurisdictions, but so are pretty much all the things you do in a war, like shooting soldiers. The various resistance organisations absolutely were terrorist organisations, explicitly so. -
2022-10-10 at 8:43 PM UTCThe word has been devalued, it's too late to roll it back now. We'll need a new "shocking" word.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2022-10-10 at 8:49 PM UTCNowadays The Proud Boys are a terrorist organisation.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/new-zealand-declares-proud-boys-a-terrorist-organization -
2022-10-11 at 12:09 AM UTClol on the pollack forums they claim that they love mcdonalds because theyre famiy men and their kids like to go sometimes. guys its so sad its not even funny how russophbic they are and just look for any excuse like a shitty mcdonalds to make themselves superior to ruskis. or feel superior.
-
2022-10-11 at 12:15 AM UTCI’ve realised I won’t react appropriately in terrorism situations because I brush it off as normal. Like the bomb going off in Paris I thought it must be normal there and I didn’t want to draw attention to myself by overreacting. People were screaming. I’ll see messed up things and think it must be okay or some reason for it, that there’s order.
-
2022-10-11 at 12:21 AM UTCIf you’ve ever seen Shaun of The Dead where he goes into the corner door, slips on blood, ignores the bloody handprint on the fridge, that’s me.
-
2022-10-11 at 12:27 AM UTC
-
2022-10-11 at 1:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat lol on the pollack forums they claim that they love mcdonalds because theyre famiy men and their kids like to go sometimes. guys its so sad its not even funny how russophbic they are and just look for any excuse like a shitty mcdonalds to make themselves superior to ruskis. or feel superior.
is it true they raised the corporate tax rate from 19% to 50% to cover military expenditure and energy price rises? -
2022-10-11 at 1:18 AM UTC
-
2022-10-11 at 1:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump Why can't they use terrorism? Terrorism is unlawful in some jurisdictions, but so are pretty much all the things you do in a war, like shooting soldiers. The various resistance organisations absolutely were terrorist organisations, explicitly so.
Okay let me type this again real slow;
"Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
There is nothing unlawful about using any means available to repel, cripple, hinder, or oppose a nation who's forces have invaded your sovereign homeland. Who's force have shelled key infrastructure located in civilian occupied zones.
WTF batman? If you are the aggressor in a campaign of territorial conquest any thing those who you have transgressed upon does in opposition is not terrorism it is justified self defense. -
2022-10-11 at 6:19 AM UTCKH-101s inbound
I guess yesterday it was land and sea-launched missiles, today it's air. Maybe tomorrow they'll start dropping satellites -
2022-10-11 at 6:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kafka I’ve realised I won’t react appropriately in terrorism situations because I brush it off as normal. Like the bomb going off in Paris I thought it must be normal there and I didn’t want to draw attention to myself by overreacting. People were screaming. I’ll see messed up things and think it must be okay or some reason for it, that there’s order.
maybe you'll get to find out soon -
2022-10-11 at 6:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Okay let me type this again real slow;
"Terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
based on what law?
if one country bans the use of weapons like depleted uranium or white phosphorous but another uses them, does that make the user a terrorist?
is it based on 'international law'?
if your state doesn't sign or ratify any agreements related to warfare or weaponry, are you immune to accusations of terrorism?
it made more sense when the definition was non-state political violence, but it's been made entirely subjective in order to be used as a political weapon. it no longer means anything in a practical sense.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
