User Controls

Poll: SPIN THAT WHEEL

First Conflict of 2022

  1. Originally posted by Donald Trump Satellites only last 10 or 20 or so years before they need to be replaced. For instance the ISS and Hubble are both end of life already. There's too much radiation and stuff up there, and solar panels and electronics degrade. Also just because something is in orbit doesn't necessarily mean it can hit a target quickly, there is a big change in velocity needed to get something out of orbit and onto a target. There is also a ban on nuclear weapons in space. I don't think it's happened.

    didnt you watched how jefff bezos blue origin went to "space" and back in literally minutes.
  2. Donald Trump Black Hole
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny didnt you watched how jefff bezos blue origin went to "space" and back in literally minutes.



    Depends how you define it. Blue origin cannot into orbit.
  3. Originally posted by Donald Trump

    Depends how you define it. Blue origin cannot into orbit.

    is this pict up to scale.
  4. If you think the various governments don't have particle and sonic weapons of mass destruction in space by now, there's no hope for you.
  5. Bradley Black Hole
    I think the aliens told us not to do that
  6. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Imagine a world without hood rats (including wiggers) and whores that leave their husbands "for something better"


    I don't care what race you are, we need to have discipline in American youth. it's the only way our country can be saved

    find what is best for our youth's job skill, not just some job councilor faggot. we need aptitude test. OMG you would make a great electronic engineer, omg you would make a great steam boat captain of fishery, omg you're really good at solving plumbing issues, omg you would make a great interior decorator.

    whatever. get to it, Plumber Joe.

  7. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    LDPR is predicting major 'false flag' attacks to justify new Ukrainian offensives and blame Russia for them.

    I don't usually post about these because they rarely eventuate, and it's often impossible to tell if this was because the 'psyop' was canceled after being revealed or if it was never going to actually happen in the first place - you may recall recently that Russian intelligence agencies claimed US PMCs were in Ukraine (which has been verified) and have been preparing 'chemical attacks', specifically with Botulism and Anthrax (which has not).

    According to Basurin they're manufacturing a series of videos meant to be spread among western- and social media -

    1. Attacks on Ukrainian positions attributed to Russian forces
    2. Ukrainian 'counter attacks' into the LDPR, specifically using the JAVELINS and other AT weapons given to them by the US and European countries
    3. LDPR civilians greeting them as 'liberators'

    The goal appears to be to demoralise the LDPR and to involve Russia in escalation, making it more difficult for them to justify getting involved when they mount the actual offensive to retake the Eastern regions.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. Seems like Zelensky made the most reasonable statement of this whole pissing match
  9. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by General Butt.Naked Seems like Zelensky made the most reasonable statement of this whole pissing match

    Zelensky has a lot less power than you might think as a President - he seems to have little effective control over the military and even less over the 'volunteer battalions'. On multiple occasions he's let slip that many of the Eastern 'government-controlled' cities aren't actually controlled by the government.

    So yeah, he's openly said that he's seen no indication that Russia plans to attack and that the western media hyping it has been causing all sorts of problems, but he may not have the power to actually do anything about it.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. The mainstream media should be designated as international terrorists.
  11. Originally posted by aldra Zelensky has a lot less power than you might think as a President - he seems to have little effective control over the military and even less over the 'volunteer battalions'. On multiple occasions he's let slip that many of the Eastern 'government-controlled' cities aren't actually controlled by the government.

    So yeah, he's openly said that he's seen no indication that Russia plans to attack and that the western media hyping it has been causing all sorts of problems, but he may not have the power to actually do anything about it.

    Yeah but turning down the temperature on the rhetoric is probably important. Anyone i talk to seems to be under the impression that the USA still has military advantage over Russia/China. But from what Ive read, thats probably not accurate anymore. Technologically, economically, morale-wise, reputation-wise…we’re severely lacking.
  12. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by General Butt.Naked Yeah but turning down the temperature on the rhetoric is probably important. Anyone i talk to seems to be under the impression that the USA still has military advantage over Russia/China. But from what Ive read, thats probably not accurate anymore. Technologically, economically, morale-wise, reputation-wise…we’re severely lacking.

    Bullshit
  13. Donald Trump Black Hole
    Originally posted by General Butt.Naked Anyone i talk to seems to be under the impression that the USA still has military advantage over Russia/China.

    I'm sure the USA could hit Russia with two nukes for every one they hit back with.
  14. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Both China and Russia are paper tigers. Their economies could not survive a war with the US.
  15. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Both China and Russia are paper tigers. Their economies could not survive a war with the US.

    believing this is why the US is in terminal decline
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by aldra believing this is why the US is in terminal decline

    Believing that is why I only take you half seriously most of the time.
  17. Originally posted by Donald Trump I'm sure the USA could hit Russia with two nukes for every one they hit back with.

    There comes a point where the number of nukes doesn't provide an advantage...

    You drop 10 nukes on a small city, you drop 100 nukes on the same city...result is the same after 10 as it is after 100.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Donald Trump I'm sure the USA could hit Russia with two nukes for every one they hit back with.

    Doubt it, Russia's pretty far ahead in both missile and anti-missile complexes but I'd doubt we'd ever see 100% interception so a nuclear exchange isn't 'winnable' for either side



    Originally posted by General Butt.Naked Anyone i talk to seems to be under the impression that the USA still has military advantage over Russia/China. But from what Ive read, thats probably not accurate anymore. Technologically, economically, morale-wise, reputation-wise…we’re severely lacking.

    Depoends on the theatre/circumstance - China's military isn't top-shelf but it's effective enough and they have a serious numbers advantage over everyone. We're likely to see Russia transferring hypersonic missile tech to them soon though which will make things interesting. They're able to effectively defend their mainland and claimed territories largely thanks to missile complexes like the DF21b, but don't have any real way to employ their overwhelming numbers outside of Asia - boots on the ground win wars but aren't much good if you can't get them to the front. That's the main thing the US military still has going for it - global supply lines and ability to rapidly deploy anywhere in the world.

    Russia's military is arguably the most effective in the world at the moment (after the intense modernisation projects of the last 10 years), but their doctrine is explicitly to be able to fight within Russia's borders or within 2000km of them, so large international deployments are out of the question. Tartus/Syria was actually a very small deployment for how successful it's been. That said, the next theatre is likely going to be within Europe where they're potentially able to deploy orders of magnitude more fully-equipped soldiers and armored divisions than NATO can in any given time period, even with the US' supply lines. More importantly they've been concentrating on technologies that neutralise US advantages, but I won't go into that because the most important thing is that in a direct conflict with a 'peer' like Russia or China where their mainland is threatened, they will almost immediately escalate to nuclear because that's where their biggest advantage is - specifically the submarine part of the triad.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. People keep forgetting that the current US administration is actually in bed with the communists, both China and Russia. This isn't a Trump administration.
  20. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ People keep forgetting that the current US administration is actually in bed with the communists, both China and Russia. This isn't a Trump administration.

    Headed by a President who thinks "the big red button" is his life alert button in case he falls down and can't get up.
Jump to Top