User Controls
I just spent $390 for an old 486 computer
-
2021-09-26 at 1:14 AM UTCgot it
-
2021-09-26 at 1:18 AM UTCcomplain anyways man fuck them don't let them fuck you around like that fucking bullshit don't be a bitch bro fucking stand up for yourself like a man man give them a piece of your ear and call their ass out
-
2021-09-26 at 1:51 AM UTCThe Scripts of Life, which all sheeple must adhere to religiously.
-
2021-09-26 at 2:57 PM UTC
-
2021-09-27 at 12:42 PM UTC
-
2021-09-27 at 11:59 PM UTC
-
2021-10-01 at 2:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump http://blog.archive.org/2019/10/13/2500-more-ms-dos-games-playable-at-the-archive/
https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos_games
https://archive.org/details/classicpcgames
You can play old games on your browser, without installing anything, at archive.org
can you with a joystick though? like how it was originally meant to be played? -
2021-10-01 at 4:17 PM UTC
-
2021-10-01 at 4:21 PM UTCYou spend hours playing with yours while watching Pornhub.
-
2021-10-01 at 4:24 PM UTC
-
2021-10-01 at 4:27 PM UTC
-
2021-10-01 at 4:32 PM UTC
-
2021-10-14 at 9:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson ? emulation isn't hardware dumbo…emulation runs on hardware..ALL emulation has lag/timing issues…might be very small but it's there. Emulation is never 100%. It's also not relevant to people who like to fuck with the hardware itself.
While it may be theoretically possible to have a 100% perfect emulator, that feat is very rare (if not nearly impossible), even for some highly regarded emulators such as higan or kevtris's work on the various FPGA-based consoles by Analogue. Just because an emulator claims to be "cycle accurate" or "100% compatible" does not mean that said emulator is flawless. This even includes situations in which all emulator accuracy tests (ie. PS1 Tests) are passed, as these tests cannot cover every single edge case, and some of these tests may even fail on real hardware, leading to even more confusion. Some things are nearly impossible to perfectly emulate, such as some of the illegal opcodes of the 6502, where the results are completely unpredictable on hardware, and different hardware revisions have different results and different illegal opcodes. The closest one could get to writing a perfect emulator would be if someone were to exactly copy an original ASIC map or a decap onto an FPGA, and even then, that isn't always a magic bullet.
https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Emulation_Accuracy
Yeah, keep grasping at straws, retard. You clearly knew what I was referring too since you mentioned it in your own post.
Emulation runs on hardware. If you have shitty hardware it will emulate shittily. Make sense, retard? -
2021-10-14 at 12:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by AngryIVer Yeah, keep grasping at straws, retard. You clearly knew what I was referring too since you mentioned it in your own post.
Emulation runs on hardware. If you have shitty hardware it will emulate shittily. Make sense, retard?
Not original hardware dumbo...NO emulator runs 100% on ANY hardware. A game running at 100% doesn't mean the hardware has been emulated 100%...fucking noobs...I tell ya.
Even FPGA often has timing issues. -
2021-10-14 at 12:39 PM UTC"While it may be theoretically possible to have a 100% perfect emulator, that feat is very rare (if not nearly impossible), even for some highly regarded emulators such as higan or kevtris's work on the various FPGA-based consoles by Analogue. Just because an emulator claims to be "cycle accurate" or "100% compatible" does not mean that said emulator is flawless."
https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Emulation_Accuracy -
2021-10-14 at 1:40 PM UTCis that why black people have problems emulating white people and their culture ?
-
2021-10-14 at 4:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson
Not original hardware dumbo…NO emulator runs 100% on ANY hardware. A game running at 100% doesn't mean the hardware has been emulated 100%…fucking noobs…I tell ya.
Even FPGA often has timing issues.
And now you start moving the goalpost to fit your narrative. I think it's clear who's in the wrong here. -
2021-10-14 at 4:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by AngryIVer And now you start moving the goalpost to fit your narrative. I think it's clear who's in the wrong here.
Lol, no goalposts moved...I said some people like to use original hardware, you either get that or you don't...and Emulation is never 100%...
Absolutely no change.
You can tell a guy driving a classic car a new one is better, more efficient and powerful etc...he still prefers the original "hardware"... -
2021-10-14 at 4:39 PM UTC
-
2021-10-14 at 9:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson
Lol, no goalposts moved…I said some people like to use original hardware, you either get that or you don't…and Emulation is never 100%…
Absolutely no change.
You can tell a guy driving a classic car a new one is better, more efficient and powerful etc…he still prefers the original "hardware"…
You still have yet to give specific examples. It went from some shit about it not being accurate, which it is, to needing "thousands of peripherals", which you don't, to emulation having nothing to do with the hardware you run it on, which it does, to a fucking less-than-wiki-article that basically says even if it's 100% accurate it's not because "I say so".
Face it, you lost.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
