User Controls

should IQ and Mental Health test be required for Gun Ownership?

  1. #21
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready LOL I got fired for taking pens and stationary home with me from a corporate office of a bank. like 3 months after I started. the manager took them and I asked if I could bring some home for work related shit (I never got paid for) she said yeah. and I kept doing it until a regional manager was doing a walk through and saw I grabbed it and reported it to security who walked me out with 20 minutes of desk clear time. in the box. walked out. then went through my box on the bottom floor to see what-else I might walk out with.

    such BS. never take anything. never ask if you can. but always make sure you get paid for taking work home which I never did.

    fucking pens and those sticky notes and a few note pads got me fired. dollar store shit.

    serial stealer wont stop until theyre caught.
  2. #22
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    you want psychiatrists to be gatekeepers on who can legally be armed?
  3. #23
    POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL
  4. #24
    POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    NO VICTOM NO CRIME,, DWI CHARGE IS UNCONSTITUITIONAL
  5. #25
    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by mmQ what would work is giving every man woman and child a full arsenal of weaponry, regardless of anything, zero testing of any sort and no background checks whatsoever.

    Then we can study as we go along, and do testing and background checks on every person that ends up using the weaponry to commit crimes, slowly learning who is the most susceptible for foul play and who are the responsible users. We can make pie charts and stuff.

    I think they tried this simulation once. Back in the mid 1800s deep south or West Va mountain range
  6. #26
    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny serial stealer wont stop until theyre caught.

    sounds like cereal killers. in a box. John and Jane
  7. #27
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready I think they tried this simulation once. Back in the mid 1800s deep south or West Va mountain range

    What were the results?
  8. #28
    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by mmQ What were the results?

    They had a hard time gathering hard data since most of them were drunk off of hard cider.
  9. #29
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready They had a hard time gathering hard data since most of them were drunk off of hard cider.

    Well that should've gone into the pie chart.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. #30
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ask yourself this :

    do you think you should be allowed to own guns ?

    Allowed?



    Such a subservient attitude young Vincent.
  11. #31
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
    Laws are for faggots.
  12. #32
    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Laws are for faggots.

    West country gravy is also for faggots.
  13. #33
    Donald Trump Black Hole
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Also should they pass at least a 99 on an IQ test.

    Most people would fail just on that.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. #34
    Originally posted by Donald Trump Most people would fail just on that.

    Don't worry, they'll lower the standard so more pass...ala the American education system philosophy.
  15. #35
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Don't worry, they'll lower the standard so more pass…ala the American education system philosophy.

    they already did it to get more women and gimps into the military
  16. #36
    Ghost Black Hole
    I think it's morally wrong to interfere with a persons liberty of owning a personal property no matter what it is. Just because your neighbor owns slaves does that give you a right to free them because you disagree with slavery?

    I'm against the idea of things being "illegal" because it's just one person telling someone else "no" and usually there is a profit incentive to keep saying no, the person is getting paid by lobbyists. Is that capitalism? It's an exchange of money for goods and service (favor in policy) but that policy is enforced by a monopoly on violence, it's kinda fucked up if you think about it like that but nobody does so nobody cares.

    They are problems nobody wants to fix because those problems keep food on peoples table. Manufactured problems, people put so much effort into stopping private citizens from doing things when most people can do drugs and own weapons with no problems, and they do. It's not hard to get "contraband" in fact people make a good living making sure people can get those things. Laws are just a waste of taxpayer money to make NIMBY moralists feel better about themselves that they are putting their tax dollars to work busting those criminals.
  17. #37
    Originally posted by Ghost I think it's morally wrong

    Morals like opinions are subjective and "right and wrong" don't exist.
  18. #38
    Ghost Black Hole
    The "gun show loophole"

    This is what people obsessed with government regulation have created. There is no "gun show loophole" it's a fucking fantasy. IF YOU MAKE 10,000 LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE ARE GOING TO FIND A WAY TO SELL THOSE GUNS.

    You CANNOT make a law that solves every problem in society. JUST BAN GUN SHOWS okay now you have back alley private gun shows BAN THOSE TOO GIVE THE POLICE MORE MONEY and something else comes up, now criminals run the gun industry BAN WEAPONS MANUFACTURING now criminals have factories making ak-47's and rocket launchers.

    Most people don't own guns and don't want to. Kick open any door in the USA, how many of those houses are locked and loaded? 30%? 50%? 80%? it probably depends on the state but I guess not EVERY SINGLE PERSON owns a gun or even wants to.

    So all you are doing by criminalizing legal ownership of anything is making that small % of people that do want to own a weapon go to gun shows to make their purchases. Of course that's also where criminals or a school shooter will go too because that's THE ONLY GOOD WAY TO GET A GUN you are FORCING the criminal and law abiding citizen to buy from the same dealer.

    Just like when weed is illegal you have to interact with criminals. It's the same fucking thing, laws turn people into criminals and create crime out of thin air. Violence is not always illegal. It is a GOD GIVEN right to defend yourself and if anyone gets in your way they are the enemy.

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. #39
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Morals like opinions are subjective and "right and wrong" don't exist.

  20. #40
    Ghost Black Hole
    Go up to any drug dealer and ask them if they sell to kids. like a 12 year old kid.

    Most people WONT

    https://niggasin.space/thread/67174
Jump to Top