User Controls
Technologist: let's have a 'constructive conversation about systemic racism'
-
2020-07-22 at 11:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Institutional racism (also known as systemic racism) is a form of racism that is embedded as normal practice within society or an organisation. It can lead to such issues as discrimination in criminal justice, employment, housing, health care, political power, and education, among other issues.
Great, thanks for outlining your theory.
Is there anything you might point to as evidence? (Canadian statistics are fine). For example, the rate of black arrests in Canada being higher than the white arrest rate. You might know where to find this info better than me. -
2020-07-22 at 11:53 PM UTCLol. Gross.
-
2020-07-22 at 11:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Rabbit,
I appreciate your attempt at a constructive conversation with me, but NIS is not the place I want to have this conversation. Yes, I stated that people here don’t want that conversation, but you proved me wrong. I do appreciate your thoughts.
This is a fringe site, not as bad as some others, but still full of outliers. I’ve never seen such blatant racism till I came to this site. Not in the mood for a gang bang.
I think you'd be surprised at how many people share the views espoused on this website, it's just that everywhere else they'd be silenced.
Regardless, if we had this debate on a 'non-fringe' website, then I'd be gang banged. Furthermore, I would almost definitely be banned, where as you are not going to be banned here for your beliefs.
So this open discussion can - as far as I can see - never happen in a public forum, if you're not willing to have it in a place where views you disagree with aren't censored.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-07-23 at 12 AM UTC" I don't want to be gang banged" ROFL 😭 happened one too many times xx 😉
-
2020-07-23 at 12:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly allowed lard-ass lanny the luxury of lapping the loins-leviathan while the little lad larps as a laotian ladyboy lapdancer............ false.
i, and others ive seen, regularly call niggers out as niggers straight to their face. for example, a few months ago i stood literally in the middle of a road repeatedly and loudly saying 'nigger' to a nigger…and the nigger did nothing but get back into its broked-ass piece of shit-mobile and drove away.
^ undocumemted interactions -
2020-07-23 at 12:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed I think you'd be surprised at how many people share the views espoused on this website, it's just that everywhere else they'd be silenced.
Regardless, if we had this debate on a 'non-fringe' website, then I'd be gang banged. Furthermore, I would almost definitely be banned, where as you are not going to be banned here for your beliefs.
So this open discussion can - as far as I can see - never happen in a public forum, if you're not willing to have it in a place where views you disagree with aren't censored.
No one is censored on here, and I like that, to an extent (except for pedophilia).
But I still am not having this conversation with you. Call me a chicken, I’m afraid and scared. Yeah, that’s it, I’m scared👍🏻 -
2020-07-23 at 12:04 AM UTCTech u snaggletooth tragedy. No one is gonna fight for ur meaningless opinion. Truthfully.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-07-23 at 12:05 AM UTCU got trolled as soon as u responded honestly to the thread, ya spaz.
-
2020-07-23 at 12:07 AM UTCMe?
-
2020-07-23 at 12:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist But I still am not having this conversation with you. Call me a chicken, I’m afraid and scared. Yeah, that’s it, I’m scared👍🏻
I'm not calling you a chicken. I am calling you a hypocrite for wanting an honest discussion on systemic racism, then refusing to have an honest discussion on systemic racism.
But as a progressive you and I speak different languages. For example the progressive term "discussion on race" in my language means - as far as I can tell - "let one of us lecture you about race".
I should have accounted for this. I am still so naive sometimes.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-07-23 at 12:08 AM UTCBoner. It's never U. Literally ever. U don't ever have to be confused, bud.
-
2020-07-23 at 12:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed I'm not calling you a chicken. I am calling you a hypocrite for wanting an honest discussion on systemic racism, then refusing to have an honest discussion on systemic racism.
But as a progressive you and I speak different languages. For example the progressive term "discussion on race" in my language means - as far as I can tell - "let one of us lecture you about race".
I should have accounted for this. I am still so naive sometimes.
Ok I’m a hypocrite. I can handle that if you think that of me👍🏻The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-07-23 at 12:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by DontTellEm U got trolled as soon as u responded honestly to the thread, ya spaz.
I'm not trolling. I'd love an honest discussion with a progressive without ad hominem, or without them quoting from the New York times like an angry puritan condemning me with their copy of the King James bible in the 17th century.
It's so hard to come by though, I suspect our differences are only going to be resolved one way. -
2020-07-23 at 12:12 AM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 12:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by Greek Style https://www.takimag.com/article/our-new-religion-of-race/
Racist hysteria is a religion now. Religions don't have conversations, they have sermons, dogma, and articles of faith. When those within a religion disagree odium theologicum and violent schizms are the result. The more irrational you are the greater your devotion - the less you want to know the stronger your faith.
You worship books, you worship texts, words are all that matter. Not evidence.
You were 100% right. Disappointing. But well put.
I genuinely believe Technologist is a nice person, behind it all. But she cannot shake off the bigotedness and narrow-mindedness of her religion. It's sad. But kind of an illustration of why you need a separation of education and state as surely as you need a separation of church and state. She's a product of her system.
She accused us of not wanting to have a conversation because it makes us uncomfortable. I invited her to one, and she couldn't... because she's uncomfortable about the prospect.
It really is sad. -
2020-07-23 at 12:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed I'm not trolling. I'd love an honest discussion with a progressive without ad hominem, or without them quoting from the New York times like an angry puritan condemning me with their copy of the King James bible in the 17th century.
It's so hard to come by though, I suspect our differences are only going to be resolved one way.
I was responding to "technologist" lol
If u want intellectual conversation maybe search for a better venue. "Niggas in space" is kinda laughable.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-07-23 at 12:15 AM UTCYes, it’s a sad state of affairs😝
-
2020-07-23 at 12:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by DontTellEm I was responding to "technologist" lol
If u want intellectual conversation maybe search for a better venue. "Niggas in space" is kinda laughable.
What venue?
Where else could a reactionary like myself openly present my viewpoint without being banned, or at the very least having all my comments 'down-voted' so that they were all made less visible?
4chan? Please, give me names. -
2020-07-23 at 12:17 AM UTC
-
2020-07-23 at 12:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed What venue?
Where else could a reactionary like myself openly present my viewpoint without being banned, or at the very least having all my comments 'down-voted' so that they were all made less visible?
4chan? Please, give me names.
I don't give a fuck, I'm not trying to have those conversations.
