User Controls
Poll: Should we open the country now?
-
Yes
- Cathay Coof ,
- Zanick ,
- A College Professor ,
- Archer513 ,
- -SpectraL ,
- Nil ,
- trippymindfuk ,
- AngryOnion ,
- Misguided Russian ,
- tr1pl3_thr3@t ,
- Splam ,
- Dfg ,
- Netflxchillr
-
No
- Technologist ,
- itybit ,
- mmQ ,
- Sudo ,
- STER0S ,
- risk ,
- MexicanMasterRace ,
- 🐿 ,
- BeeReBuddy ,
- Sophie
Should we open the country now?
-
2020-04-16 at 1:25 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 1:27 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 1:33 PM UTCItybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?
-
2020-04-16 at 1:34 PM UTCIt should have never been open in the first place. MUH boomers muh aeroplanes
-
2020-04-16 at 1:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Erekshun Itybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?
So what criteria should we use for opening back up? -
2020-04-16 at 1:36 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 1:43 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 1:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by Erekshun Itybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?
In an ideal scenario we should test every single person in the world once a week. If we did then this would be over with immediately. Obviously that’s impossible. The next best thing is to test as many people as possible. The more infected people we can track, the more we can isolate them, and the less it will spread. This is how countries like Taiwan and Iceland were able to contain their outbreaks. Widespread testing and tracking.
That’s the first reason why testing is important. The second is it serves as an indicator for when we should reopen the country. If we didn’t test anybody we wouldn’t know how many people have it. There could be one person or one million people. We would have no idea when to open the country back up -
2020-04-16 at 1:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly lambasted lannys longing loose labia like the liberal little laotian ladyboy he loves larping like, leaving the little lads larynx lacerated and laryngitic.........,..(banned) False. The solution is to let nature run its course…the way it has for 4 billion years.
Let everyone get infected, the nature immune response will do its job, and the weak will be culled and the strong will carry on. The virus will die out or lose its ability to have wide spread effects.
Indians, the white man, and small pox.
Yeah but I'm making more money now then I ever have so since everything is about me I think this is just fine and we should continue with the lockdown for as long as possible. -
2020-04-16 at 1:56 PM UTCJust test like South Korea
-
2020-04-16 at 1:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly lambasted lannys longing loose labia like the liberal little laotian ladyboy he loves larping like, leaving the little lads larynx lacerated and laryngitic.........,..(banned) False. The solution is to let nature run its course…the way it has for 4 billion years.
Let everyone get infected, the nature immune response will do its job, and the weak will be culled and the strong will carry on. The virus will die out or lose its ability to have wide spread effects.
Indians, the white man, and small pox.
Ok I’ll rephrase. In a situation where we consider lots of people dying as a negative thing, we should test lots of people. Personally I’m all for taking the ol scythe to large swaths of the population. I would rejoice if 70-80% of people were eradicated -
2020-04-16 at 2:39 PM UTCi should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so... seems to be most logical.
but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do. -
2020-04-16 at 2:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Netflxchillr i should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so… seems to be most logical.
but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do.
We need to build more walls. -
2020-04-16 at 2:44 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 2:45 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 2:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Netflxchillr i should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so… seems to be most logical.
but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do.
Why would you let the states decide? Trump has the absolute authority to force them to open back up -
2020-04-16 at 3:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox Why would you let the states decide? Trump has the absolute authority to force them to open back up
and your actual, "point," is...??
what??
that your stance is...: for letting TRUMP decide? or are you wanting to banter whether or not states should have their own authority to decide for themselves? -
2020-04-16 at 3:12 PM UTCI don’t have a stance I just like pushing people’s buttons 😜
-
2020-04-16 at 3:15 PM UTC
-
2020-04-16 at 6:56 PM UTCpoll question is retarded without stating intention.
do you want more people to die ?
to live ?
what ?