User Controls

Should we open the country now?

  1. #21
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Erekshun That’s what you think I meant? Rethink

    No I'm curious too. "Testing is useless" kinda just means one thing. Will you clarify?
  2. #22
    Originally posted by Erekshun That’s what you think I meant? Rethink

    Well you’re saying testing is useless so it follows that we should do zero testing. Is that not what you meant?
  3. #23
    Erekshun Naturally Camouflaged
    Itybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?
  4. #24
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    It should have never been open in the first place. MUH boomers muh aeroplanes
  5. #25
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Erekshun Itybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?

    So what criteria should we use for opening back up?
  6. #26
    Erekshun Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by mmQ So what criteria should we use for opening back up?

    Are you admitting testing is useless for opening up?
  7. #27
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Erekshun Are you admitting testing is useless for opening up?

    No. Regardless of the fact that a person who tests negative can still get infected , testing is still the means by which we can measure what's going on.
  8. #28
    Originally posted by Erekshun Itybit said we shouldn’t open up until we get testing. I replied to that. Say you test me today and I am negative. What good does that do if I get exposed right after and it takes 14 days until I start showing symptoms?

    In an ideal scenario we should test every single person in the world once a week. If we did then this would be over with immediately. Obviously that’s impossible. The next best thing is to test as many people as possible. The more infected people we can track, the more we can isolate them, and the less it will spread. This is how countries like Taiwan and Iceland were able to contain their outbreaks. Widespread testing and tracking.

    That’s the first reason why testing is important. The second is it serves as an indicator for when we should reopen the country. If we didn’t test anybody we wouldn’t know how many people have it. There could be one person or one million people. We would have no idea when to open the country back up
  9. #29
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly lambasted lannys longing loose labia like the liberal little laotian ladyboy he loves larping like, leaving the little lads larynx lacerated and laryngitic.........,..(banned) False. The solution is to let nature run its course…the way it has for 4 billion years.

    Let everyone get infected, the nature immune response will do its job, and the weak will be culled and the strong will carry on. The virus will die out or lose its ability to have wide spread effects.

    Indians, the white man, and small pox.

    Yeah but I'm making more money now then I ever have so since everything is about me I think this is just fine and we should continue with the lockdown for as long as possible.
  10. #30
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Just test like South Korea
  11. #31
    Originally posted by infinityshock lovingly lambasted lannys longing loose labia like the liberal little laotian ladyboy he loves larping like, leaving the little lads larynx lacerated and laryngitic.........,..(banned) False. The solution is to let nature run its course…the way it has for 4 billion years.

    Let everyone get infected, the nature immune response will do its job, and the weak will be culled and the strong will carry on. The virus will die out or lose its ability to have wide spread effects.

    Indians, the white man, and small pox.

    Ok I’ll rephrase. In a situation where we consider lots of people dying as a negative thing, we should test lots of people. Personally I’m all for taking the ol scythe to large swaths of the population. I would rejoice if 70-80% of people were eradicated
  12. #32
    Netflxchillr African Astronaut
    i should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so... seems to be most logical.

    but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do.
  13. #33
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Netflxchillr i should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so… seems to be most logical.

    but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do.

    We need to build more walls.
  14. #34
    Netflxchillr African Astronaut
  15. #35
    stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Solstice Im opening my asshole now



    We're looking for new solutions, not that old worn out thing.
  16. #36
    Originally posted by Netflxchillr i should review the situation a little more before giving a definitive answer, but if i answer to my disposition as it is now- my feelings are that: Each state progress forward accordingly to their "readiness" to do so… seems to be most logical.

    but, how do we still approach travel to/fro from one state to another? too many people are not willing to follow rules/restrictions of containment- so, I'm not sure what we should do.

    Why would you let the states decide? Trump has the absolute authority to force them to open back up
  17. #37
    Netflxchillr African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Fox Why would you let the states decide? Trump has the absolute authority to force them to open back up

    and your actual, "point," is...??

    what??

    that your stance is...: for letting TRUMP decide? or are you wanting to banter whether or not states should have their own authority to decide for themselves?
  18. #38
    I don’t have a stance I just like pushing people’s buttons 😜
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. #39
    Netflxchillr African Astronaut
    ^this i know, and have come to understand... about you, my little foxy.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. #40
    poll question is retarded without stating intention.

    do you want more people to die ?

    to live ?

    what ?
Jump to Top