User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 130
  6. 131
  7. 132
  8. 133
  9. 134
  10. 135
  11. ...
  12. 165
  13. 166
  14. 167
  15. 168

Thanked Posts by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

  1. Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood HE IS DONE FOR


    Perfect outcome for a staged dog & pony show. What a coincidence!
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. There's nothing illegal about following a jury bus. It's called freedom. This judge is an idiot.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. I'll be managing Candy from now on, so every time you invoke her brand, you need to cough up $200. You can also buy a limited license on a yearly basis.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. Originally posted by Speedy Parker I'm pretty sure you mean evoke. If not that I shall freely evoke any brand you "manage".

    I meant it as a spiritual summoning.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Originally posted by Donald Trump Then where would I keep my keys?

    In your butt crack.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. Take the money out of the equation and see if the "studies" change.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. Originally posted by Nile Yeah. Like that time those dumbasses in Calgary built in a flood plain.

    You know what happened? Yeah.

    We have idiots over here who build right on the shore of a river which regularly floods. Their homes get destroyed, they sell the properties, the next fools come right along and buy and rebuild, the flood comes again, and the cycle repeats. It's been that way for the past 150 years, unending. The insurance companies won't even take them, but that doesn't stop them one bit. Then they get on facebook and cry about it and do their little song and dance. Literally double-digit IQs.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. Originally posted by stl1 More babble…

    Four long years of your Russia hoax, day and night, seven days a week, 365 days a year. No apology. No remorse. No shame.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. When they use the term "efficacy", they're not referring to transmission of the virus. They're referring to antibody production. Both the vaxxed and unvaxxed can transmit and contract the virus equally. In fact, the experimental concoctions were never intended to, or designed to, prevent transmission of any virus, only make you less sick when you do get it. And you will get it. Everyone on earth will, eventually. Just like a common flu or a common cold. So this idea of segregating society between vaxxed and unvaxxed is based entirely without science or facts, and solely on fear and the power of politics.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. Originally posted by Obbe It’s time to face the fact that resolving the climate crisis will require a fundamental shift away from our growth-based, corporate-dominated global system.

    https://www.resilience.org/stories/2021-10-13/solving-the-climate-crisis-requires-the-end-of-capitalism/

    They're going to change the weather by picking the pockets of people just making it from paycheck to paycheck, but you think that's alright.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Mind control operations. Divide and conquer.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. Originally posted by Obbe Look at what Exxon Mobil did in the 80s. They designed a ship that at the time was state of the art to measure pollution levels in the atmosphere at sea. They found that continued use of fossil fuels and the increase of use over the next decades would have a huge impact on our climate. They decided to burry the report and actively fund denial campaigns. All for short term gains.

    Lots of articles about this here is one https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

    Sure, there's much too much pollution the multi-national corporations are damaging our planet with, but that's not the discussion. The discussion is picking the pockets of the public and forcing them to adhere to strict and authoritarian orders, mandates, and decrees. I sure don't see any multi-national corporations worried about anything. In fact, their profits increase to record highs every single year, year after year.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  13. Originally posted by Obbe In May 2020, as the world was convulsed by the coronavirus pandemic and global infections topped 4 million, a strange video began appearing in the feeds of some Facebook users. “Climate alarm is reaching untold levels of exaggeration and hysteria,” said an unseen narrator, over a montage of environmental protests and clips of a tearful Greta Thunberg. “There is no doubt about it, climate change has become a cult,” it continued, to the kind of pounding beat you might hear on the soundtrack of a Hollywood blockbuster. “Carbon dioxide emissions have become the wages of sin.”

    The video’s reach was relatively small: according to Facebook data, it was viewed somewhere between 15,000 and 20,000 times. But over the following weeks more videos came, each one experimenting with slightly different scripts and visuals. All focused on the supposed irrationality and hypocrisy of climate campaigners, and the hardship they wanted to inflict upon society’s most impoverished communities. “Those who demand action on climate change continue to fly around in private jets from one virtue-signalling climate conference to the next,” stated one, against a backdrop of Leonardo DiCaprio and Prince Harry delivering speeches from lecterns. “Is this fair?” Another video took aim at the idea that countries should be transitioning towards “net zero” carbon dioxide emissions, calling it an “unnecessary and swingeing plan that hits the poor and costs the earth”. In total, between May and July, the advertiser spent less than £3,000 disseminating 10 videos. Collectively, they were viewed more than half a million times.

    At one stage, users hovering over the logo of that advertiser – a UK organisation called The Global Warming Policy Forum, or GWPF – were informed by Facebook that it was a “Science Site”. The GWPF is not a science website: it is the campaigning arm of a well-funded foundation accused by opponents of being one of Britain’s biggest sources of climate science denial.

    The videos being tested by the GWPF in the spring and summer of 2020 were part of a strategic pivot away from explicit climate crisis denialism, and towards something subtler – a move being pursued by similar campaigners across the world. Welcome to a new age of what the atmospheric scientist and environmental author Michael E Mann has labelled climate “inactivism”: an epic struggle to convince you not so much to doubt the reality of climate crisis, but rather to dampen your enthusiasm for any attempts at dealing with it.

    Did you know that real science is not established? Real science is never settled. By its very nature, it is a working of differing opinions. As soon as one side of the discussion is stifled, limited, banned, deleted, edited, harassed, or criminalized, it's no longer real science. That's the tell, if you want to know if you are dealing with actual fraudsters.

    "The truth doesn't mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged."
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. Originally posted by Obbe Who cares what you trust? The facts don't change just because you want to bury your head in the sand.

    Nothing you've stated can't be used on all you in reverse.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. Stop whining, kid.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Trust me. It's all part of a giant spook psyop operation to keep the sheep occupied, while world changing events are currently in process. This is merely a small cog in that great wheel. Bottom line is, stop complying with the official narrative. The official narrative is evil and false by nature. By default. Automatically.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Originally posted by Nigger Nintendo Anyone caught on camera must have been targeted durrrtt try again

    The drone camera only focuses in on Rittenhouse, before he even shot anyone. What a coincidence!
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. This is all yet another FBI psyop to eat up the news cycle and distract from the continuing fall of the deep state. Rittenhouse had many Facebook posts supporting BLM and Antifa, but they were all wiped by the FBI the same day he was arrested.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny female negroe ?

    Male.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. *Quick Ready Mix alert*
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 130
  6. 131
  7. 132
  8. 133
  9. 134
  10. 135
  11. ...
  12. 165
  13. 166
  14. 167
  15. 168
Jump to Top