User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1243
  6. 1244
  7. 1245
  8. 1246
  9. 1247
  10. 1248
  11. ...
  12. 1361
  13. 1362
  14. 1363
  15. 1364

Posts by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

  1. 100% proof the Democrats and China hacked the 2020 election for Biden.

  2. The commie fascists always think their laws supersede the Constitution. Then they keep finding out different, always the hard way.
  3. The plate flipper would be best. A vanity plate as the fake, always showing, and the real one tucked away behind, ready to be flipped to the front at the push of a button.
  4. It looks like a lot of ships, but it's actually a few giant triangular-shaped ships, with only their navigation lights running. Depending on what lean the ship has, and the perspective of the viewer, it can appear to be several ships moving together, but it's really very large space vehicles shaped like triangles, with only their running lights showing.
  5. Originally posted by stl1 When is sooner than "NEVER"?

    You are simply deluded, if you think it's all not going to come out. It WILL come out. All of it. And there's nothing at all you crazies can do to stop it.
  6. Oh, what are you gonna do?
    When there's a part of you that needs to run with the wind
    And the fires of burning yesterdays
    Can only light the way to lead you from the Garden of the Dark

    Stay out of shadows now
    Looks like The Change is on
    Tomorrow's never gone
    Today just never comes

    Go on and jump, yeah
    Into the hurricane
    You will forget the pain
    It's only there to exorcise your mind

    Looking at the world, when you've opened up your eyes
    You've got to see the promises they've made
    They're bloody lies and broken dreams
    Your silence screams!

    You're living in a time machine
    And you can choose just who you are
    Someone that you've never seen, somewhere you've never been
    You're living in a time machine

    Oh, what are you gonna do?
    When every part of you just needs to catch the wind
    And the fires of burning yesterdays
    Can only light the way to lead you from the Garden of the Dark

    Looking for the world, when you've opened up your eyes
    You'll see you've got invisible chains
    They're only lies, not what it seems
    I hear your silent screams!


  7. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny where to get mr.toyotas sperm.

    From the Toyota factory.
  8. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny nothing

    You just said it was an "unintelligent rule", kid.
  9. Originally posted by POLECAT CUZ UR POOR . THRIFTY OR UR WEED IS SO FUCKIN GOOD YOU ONLY ROLL PIN JOINTS?

    I smoke about an ounce of the GG4 a month. $100 ounces. Top shelf product grown professionally. Nice concentrated buds, fresh and packaged in medicinal ziplocks.
  10. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny why would intelligent space travellers have unintelligent rules.

    What's unintelligent about not eating people?
  11. Originally posted by POLECAT I'M NOT SATISFYED i DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TOYOTA'S IN MY YARD

    Couldn't you plant some Toyota seeds.
  12. Originally posted by POLECAT NOT HARDLY NIGGER. WE THE PEOPLE ARE TAKING BACK OUR COUNTRY,, AND WHO THE FUCK IS STILL SMOKING BONGS???
    I'M A ZIGZAG MAN, ORANGE ZIGZAG'S 4 LIFE, ORANGE TRUMP FOR MY PREZ 4 LIFE

    I'm a white ZigZags man for lyfe and don't use bongs either.
  13. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny what are those rules.

    1. can't eat people
    2. can't scare people
    3. can't share classified technology
    4. can't land on people's houses
    5. can't litter
  14. Wellhung feels satisfied and slightly smug at the fact his cupboards and refrigerator are now full with foodstuffs.
  15. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ask yourself, if you were a non-hispanic alien visitor to this planet, what would you do on planet earth.

    Firstly, I have would have to abide by the laws of the United Federation of Planets, in regard to contact with uncivilized societies.
  16. The government server's firewall hides the attachment, so he can't even see it. The e-mail would look practically empty, except for the text and a little hotlink near the upper right to reveal the attachment. He's too retarded to know that, though, and the sender is also a retard.
  17. Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Evidence shows a woman will extend a mans life by 5-10 years. Stress or not, their mother comfort keeps you healthier.

    However i want half free time alone. And extended me time for a week here and there

    They get the garbage taken out 3,650 more times that way.
  18. Originally posted by stl1 The Guardian
    Is America heading to a place where it can no longer call itself a democracy?
    David Smith in Washington


    If Donald Trump’s inaugural address can be summed up in two words – “American carnage” – Joe Biden’s might be remembered for three: “Democracy has prevailed.”

    The new president, speaking from the spot where just two weeks earlier a pro-Trump mob had stormed the US Capitol, promised that the worst was over in a battered, bruised yet resilient Washington.

    But now, four and a half months later the alarm bells are sounding on American democracy again. Even as the coronavirus retreats, the pandemic of Trump’s “big lie” about a stolen election spreads, manifest in Republicans’ blocking of a commission to investigate the insurrection. And state after state is imposing new voting restrictions and Trump allies are now vying to run future election themselves.

    With Republicans still in thrall to Trump and odds-on to win control of the House of Representatives next year, there are growing fears that his presidency was less a historical blip than a harbinger of systemic decline.

    “There was a momentary sigh of relief but the level of anxiety is actually strangely higher now than in 2016 in the sense that it’s not just about one person but there are broader structural issues,” said Daniel Ziblatt, co-author of How Democracies Die. “The weird emails that I get are more ominous now than they were in 2016: there seems to be a much deeper level of misinformation and conspiracy theories.”

    ‘There was a momentary sigh of relief but the level of anxiety is actually strangely higher now than in 2016,’ said Daniel Ziblatt, co-author of How Democracies Die.

    There seems to be a much deeper level of misinformation and conspiracy theories

    Daniel Ziblatt
    Just hours after the terror of 6 January, 147 Republicans in Congress voted to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election despite no evidence of irregularities. Trump was impeached for inciting the violence but Senate Republicans ensured his acquittal – a fork in the road where the party could have chosen another destiny.

    As Trump continued to push his false claims of election fraud, rightwing media and Republican state parties fell into line. A farcical “audit” of votes is under way in Arizona with more states threatening to follow suit. Trump is reportedly so fixated on the audits that he has even suggested – wrongly – he could be reinstated as president later this year.

    Perhaps more insidiously, Trump supporters who tried to overturn the 2020 election are maneuvering to serve as election officials in swing states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada. If they succeed in becoming secretaries of state, they would exercise huge influence over the conduct of future elections and certifying their results. Some moderate Republican secretaries of state were crucial bulwarks against Trump’s toxic conspiracy theories last year.

    The offensive is coupled with a dramatic and sweeping assault on voting rights. Republican-controlled state legislatures have rammed through bills that make it harder to vote in states such as Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa and Montana. Their all-out effort in Texas was temporarily derailed when Democrats walked out of the chamber, denying them a quorum.

    Ziblatt, a political scientist at Harvard University, commented: “The most worrying threat is at the state level, the effort to change voting rules, which I think is prompted by the failed effort to alter the election outcome of 2020.

    “The lesson Republicans have learnt from that is they don’t really suffer any electoral consequences from their base pursuing this kind of thing. In fact, they’re rewarded for it. That’s very ominous because that suggests they’ll continue to try to do this until they pay an electoral price for it, and so far they don’t sense they’re paying an electoral price for it.”

    Where is this authoritarian ecosystem heading? For many, the nightmare scenario is that Trump will run again in 2024 and, with the benefit of voter suppression, sneak a win in the electoral college as he did in 2016. If that fails, plan B would be for a Republican-controlled House to refuse to certify a Democratic winner and overturn the result in Trump’s favour.

    Disputed presidential elections have been thrown to the House before, Ziblatt noted. “It’s not unprecedented but in those earlier periods you had two parties that were constitutional, fully democratic parties. The thought of having a dispute like that when one of the parties is only questionably committed to democratic rules and norms is very frightening.”

    People use elections to get into power and then, once in power, assault democratic institutions

    Daniel Ziblatt
    In How Democracies Die, Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky argue that democracies often come under threat not from invading armies or violent revolutions but at the ballot box: death by a thousand cuts. “People use elections to get into power and then, once in power, assault democratic institutions,” Ziblatt said.

    “That’s Viktor Orbán [in Hungary], that’s Recep Tayyip Erdoğan [in Turkey], that’s Hugo Chávez [in Venezuela] and what’s distinctive about that is that it often begins incrementally. So people continue to go about their lives, continue to vote, parliament continues to meet and so you think, ‘Is there really a threat?’ But the power concentrates so it becomes harder and harder to unseat an incumbent.”

    He added: “We shouldn’t overlook that fact that we had a change in government in January. What that suggests is our electoral institutions do work better than they do in Hungary. The opposition in the United States is more well-organised and financed than the Hungarian opposition or the Turkish opposition, so we shouldn’t overstate that. But on the other hand, the tendencies are very similar.”

    Republicans are also playing a very long game, rewiring democracy’s hard drive in an attempt to consolidate power. Trump is arguably both cause and effect of the lurch right, which takes place in the wider context of white Christians losing majority status in America’s changing demographics.

    His grip on the party appears only to have tightened since his defeat, as evidenced by the ousting of Trump critic Liz Cheney from House leadership and their use of a procedural move known as the filibuster to block the 6 January commission. Critics say that, in an atmosphere of partisan tribalism, the party is now driven by a conviction that Democratic victories are by definition illegitimate.

    Kurt Bardella, a former Republican congressional aide who is now a Democrat, said: “It’s very clear that the next time there is a violent effort to overthrow our government, Republicans in Congress will be knowing accomplices in that effort. They are the getaway driver for the democratic arsonists.”

    Bardella, a political commentator, added: “It has become painfully transparent that the Republican party platform is 100% anti-democratic and it is their ambition to impose minority rule on the majority going forward, because they know that when the playing field is level, they can’t win and so they have instead decided to double down on supporting a wannabe autocrat, and are doing everything they can to destabilise the democratic safeguards that we’ve had in place since the founding of our country.

    “We cannot underestimate the gravity of this moment in time because what happens over the next month or year could be the turning point in this battle to preserve our democracy.”

    The threat poses a dilemma for Biden, who was elected on a promise of building bridges and seeking bipartisanship. He continues to do so while issuing increasingly stark calls to arms. Speaking in Tulsa, Oklahoma, this week, he repeated his “democracy prevailed” mantra but then warned of a “truly unprecedented assault on our democracy” and announced that the vice-president, Kamala Harris, would lead an effort to strengthen voting rights.

    Proposed national legislation to address the issue, however, depends on a Senate currently split 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans (Harris has the tie-breaking vote). In order to pass it with a simple majority, Democrats would first have to abolish the filibuster but at least two senators, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have ruled out such a step.

    Facing this stalemate, activists and civil society are trying to create a sense of urgency. More than a hundred scholars this week released a joint statement, posted by the New America thinktank, expressing “deep concern” at “radical changes to core electoral procedures” that jeopardise free and fair elections. “Our entire democracy is now at risk,” the scholars wrote.

    Last year’s poll was dubbed “the election that could break America” and the nation was widely considered to have dodged a bullet; it may not be so fortunate in 2024. Yvette Simpson, chief executive of the progressive group Democracy for Action, added: “We’re getting to the place where we might not be able to call ourselves a democracy any more. That’s how dire it is.

    “It is not just the fact that there is an orchestrated, concerted effort across our country to interfere with the most fundamental right of any democracy but that they’re doing it so blatantly, so out in the open and so unapologetically, and that there have been many attempts and there’s no easy way to stop it.”

    Simpson compared Democrats’ victory over Trump to the film Avengers: Endgame and warned against complacency. “We just defeated Thanos and everybody was like, ‘OK, let’s take a break,’ and I’m like, ‘No, we cannot take a break because the GOP never take a break’. They know that we’re taking a break and that’s why they’re doing it now and so aggressively: ‘You think you won because Trump is out? Oh, we got you.’”

    Ibram X Kendi, a historian and author of How to Be an Antiracist, added: “At the end of the day, there is an all out war on American voters, particularly younger voters, particularly younger voters of colour, and it’s happening from Texas to Florida and it’s really causing the American people to decide whether we want our democracy or not.”

    tl/dr
  19. Late 24 February to early 25 February 1942 in Los Angeles, California

    The "Battle of Los Angeles"

    "Radars picked up an unidentified target 120 miles west of Los Angeles. Antiaircraft batteries were alerted at 0215 and were put on Green Alert—ready to fire—a few minutes later. The AAF kept its pursuit planes on the ground, preferring to await indications of the scale and direction of any attack before committing its limited fighter force. Radars tracked the approaching target to within a few miles of the coast, and at 0221 the regional controller ordered a blackout. Thereafter the information center was flooded with reports of "enemy planes, " even though the mysterious object tracked in from sea seems to have vanished. At 0243, planes were reported near Long Beach, and a few minutes later a coast artillery colonel spotted "about 25 planes at 12,000 feet" over Los Angeles. At 0306 a balloon carrying a red flare was seen over Santa Monica and four batteries of anti-aircraft artillery opened fire, whereupon "the air over Los Angeles erupted like a volcano." From this point on reports were hopelessly at variance."


    "Probably much of the confusion came from the fact that anti-aircraft shell bursts, caught by the searchlights, were themselves mistaken for enemy planes. In any case, the next three hours produced some of the most imaginative reporting of the war: "swarms" of planes (or, sometimes, balloons) of all possible sizes, numbering from one to several hundred, traveling at altitudes which ranged from a few thousand feet to more than 20,000 and flying at speeds which were said to have varied from "very slow" to over 200 miles per hour, were observed to parade across the skies. These mysterious forces dropped no bombs and, despite the fact that 1,440 rounds of anti-aircraft ammunition were directed against them, suffered no losses. There were reports, to be sure, that four enemy planes had been shot down, and one was supposed to have landed in flames at a Hollywood intersection. Residents in a forty-mile arc along the coast watched from hills or rooftops as the play of guns and searchlights provided the first real drama of the war for citizens of the mainland. The dawn, which ended the shooting and the fantasy, also proved that the only damage which resulted to the city was such as had been caused by the excitement (there was at least one death from heart failure), by traffic accidents in the blacked-out streets, or by shell fragments from the artillery barrage. Attempts to arrive at an explanation of the incident quickly became as involved and mysterious as the "battle" itself. The Navy immediately insisted that there was no evidence of the presence of enemy planes, and [Secretary of the Navy], Frank Knox announced at a press conference on 25 February that the raid was just a false alarm. At the same conference he admitted that attacks were always possible and indicated that vital industries located along the coast ought to be moved inland. The Army had a hard time making up its mind on the cause of the alert. A report to Washington, made by the Western Defense Command shortly after the raid had ended, indicated that the credibility of reports of an attack had begun to be shaken before the blackout was lifted. This message predicted that developments would prove "that most previous reports had been greatly exaggerated." The Fourth Air Force had indicated its belief that there were no planes over Los Angeles. But the Army did not publish these initial conclusions. Instead, it waited a day, until after a thorough examination of witnesses had been finished. On the basis of these hearings, local commanders altered their verdict and indicated a belief that from one to five unidentified airplanes had been over Los Angeles."

  20. Tough to find evidence you've already decided not to look for.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1243
  6. 1244
  7. 1245
  8. 1246
  9. 1247
  10. 1248
  11. ...
  12. 1361
  13. 1362
  14. 1363
  15. 1364
Jump to Top