User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1027
  6. 1028
  7. 1029
  8. 1030
  9. 1031
  10. 1032
  11. ...
  12. 1358
  13. 1359
  14. 1360
  15. 1361

Posts by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

  1. Originally posted by Nile It's snowing outside right now. Seems settled to me lol.

    It's cold ur wrong, get over it

    Not snowing here.
  2. Originally posted by stl1 I scare Speculum so much, he's seeing doubles of me!

    BOO, motherfucker.

    Sooo... you're 200+ lbs.
  3. Originally posted by lockedin he has a demonstrably poor understanding of that too

    Not true. I have decades of know-how under my belt.
  4. Originally posted by mmQ Could I follow that rule without obeying ?

    And if I had my child next to me, I guess I can't honestly say what I would do in a panic but I like to think I would DISOBEY the rule and help them first because who the fuck am I anyway

    Most people today are "civic-minded" and will follow explicit instructions from authorities without question or hesitation. That's why I asked.
  5. Originally posted by Obbe In May 2020, as the world was convulsed by the coronavirus pandemic and global infections topped 4 million, a strange video began appearing in the feeds of some Facebook users. “Climate alarm is reaching untold levels of exaggeration and hysteria,” said an unseen narrator, over a montage of environmental protests and clips of a tearful Greta Thunberg. “There is no doubt about it, climate change has become a cult,” it continued, to the kind of pounding beat you might hear on the soundtrack of a Hollywood blockbuster. “Carbon dioxide emissions have become the wages of sin.”

    The video’s reach was relatively small: according to Facebook data, it was viewed somewhere between 15,000 and 20,000 times. But over the following weeks more videos came, each one experimenting with slightly different scripts and visuals. All focused on the supposed irrationality and hypocrisy of climate campaigners, and the hardship they wanted to inflict upon society’s most impoverished communities. “Those who demand action on climate change continue to fly around in private jets from one virtue-signalling climate conference to the next,” stated one, against a backdrop of Leonardo DiCaprio and Prince Harry delivering speeches from lecterns. “Is this fair?” Another video took aim at the idea that countries should be transitioning towards “net zero” carbon dioxide emissions, calling it an “unnecessary and swingeing plan that hits the poor and costs the earth”. In total, between May and July, the advertiser spent less than £3,000 disseminating 10 videos. Collectively, they were viewed more than half a million times.

    At one stage, users hovering over the logo of that advertiser – a UK organisation called The Global Warming Policy Forum, or GWPF – were informed by Facebook that it was a “Science Site”. The GWPF is not a science website: it is the campaigning arm of a well-funded foundation accused by opponents of being one of Britain’s biggest sources of climate science denial.

    The videos being tested by the GWPF in the spring and summer of 2020 were part of a strategic pivot away from explicit climate crisis denialism, and towards something subtler – a move being pursued by similar campaigners across the world. Welcome to a new age of what the atmospheric scientist and environmental author Michael E Mann has labelled climate “inactivism”: an epic struggle to convince you not so much to doubt the reality of climate crisis, but rather to dampen your enthusiasm for any attempts at dealing with it.

    Did you know that real science is not established? Real science is never settled. By its very nature, it is a working of differing opinions. As soon as one side of the discussion is stifled, limited, banned, deleted, edited, harassed, or criminalized, it's no longer real science. That's the tell, if you want to know if you are dealing with actual fraudsters.

    "The truth doesn't mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged."
  6. Originally posted by mmQ For example…

    2020 President.
  7. "The facts". Whose facts?
  8. Originally posted by mmQ All proper nouns are things but not all things are proper nouns

    And some proper nouns aren't even proper nouns.
  9. Originally posted by Obbe Who cares what you trust? The facts don't change just because you want to bury your head in the sand.

    Nothing you've stated can't be used on all you in reverse.
  10. Originally posted by mmQ Also he gets mad when the flight attendant explains how in the event of a crash you should put the oxygen mask on yourself before anyone else including your own child.

    "That was my plan to begin with you didn't have to fucking blurt it out to the entire plane."

    Would you follow that rule and obey?
  11. Originally posted by stl1 Someone seems a little too invested.

    Because you're 400+ pounds. Fattie.
  12. Originally posted by Obbe In political jargon, a useful idiot is a derogatory term for a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically used by the cause's leaders.

    It's much simpler than that. We simply don't trust the credibility of your data. Period. End of story.
  13. Originally posted by stl1 You'd be almost 200 lbs. overweight.

    Would you agree to a weigh in?
  14. And remember, according to the CDC and the WHO, you have a 0.03% chance of dying of SARS COV-2 if you are under 65. You have a three hundredth of one percent chance of dying of the virus. But these nutbags are still quite willing, even gleeful, to destroy and pillage society as you knew it. Chicken Littles. The sky is falling! Seriously. These people are literally mentally deranged, and extremely dangerous.
  15. The ONLY reason they could even get emergency authorization from the FDA is because they promised and swore and begged to provide INFORMED CONSENT. But do you know what's on the inside information pamphlet inside the box on the product? Nothing. Nada. Zip. They put a blank piece of paper in there that says, "Intentionally Left Blank". The staff at injection sites provide zero safety information. And since when does "informed consent" include extortion, bribery threats, segregation, denial of public services, denial of government services, denial of health services, loss of your job, and restricted travel? That's voluntary and informed consent? Really? In what world?
  16. Originally posted by Spezmose 77 wasn't so safe for these people.


    The windows where the wings would have been were all intact.
  17. Originally posted by Obbe The Climate change hoax is driven by large corporations that directly benefit from pollution, and their gang of useful idiots.

    fixed
  18. Loose arse flaps are eventual.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1027
  6. 1028
  7. 1029
  8. 1030
  9. 1031
  10. 1032
  11. ...
  12. 1358
  13. 1359
  14. 1360
  15. 1361
Jump to Top