Originally posted by aldra
There don't need to be internal FBI files; in many cases the process and interviews with the 'informants' are publicly available - like the case of the 1993 WTC bombings.
Specifically talking about the book The Terror factory, it cites many of those interviews. What's more it was publicly endorsed by a well-regarded ex-FBI agent who went on to write his own book expanding on the same topic (though I haven't read this one).
Nobody is debating the facts.
We're debating all the space you've filled in with your own bias. Again, if you can't see how this information you linked isn't credible, I don't know what to tell you. 3rd party info, Russian think tank... yeah. Maybe not the best source of information on the goddamn FBI.
You are doing literally the exact same thing the Q guy I know does. Giving information that people can't possibly debate, and when you're like "Well what about all this crazy stuff?" then the excuses come out.
Either
1. I'm not looking in the right spots
2. I need to do my research.
3. I'm a stupid liberal.
It always boils down to these things because the people involved are so heavily biased they can't see that sources from goddamn Russian think tanks don't give an accurate picture of US government. All they have to do to get you to bite the hook is say one thing that is true, and then you'll believe the rest of the lies they tell as facts. Clearly if there are documents, it means its true!
Tell me, have you ever taken a statistics class? You're falling prey to biased sampling. It's a typical propaganda move and one the Q people use in great force.
I don't know if you realize that you use literally the exact same language and phrasing as the Q people.
Let me spell it out for you though: The FBI is NOT responsible for 'every terrorist attack since 1992'. That is so fucking ludicrous. 9/10 their tactics work.
They find people willing to commit terroristic acts and stop them before they get the opportunity. Sometimes those people commit the crimes anyway. You can talk about the 90's all you like but that was almost 30 years ago and not really relevant to FBI tactics today in the computer age.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-interviewed-dead-boston-bombing-suspect-years-ago/https://www.thedailybeast.com/boston-bomber-told-fbi-he-was-approached-by-mystery-men-in-suitsSame facts, but the way it is framed is everything.
I really don't understand how you don't see clear through this propaganda shit. Seriously, didn't you go to college? You didn't take journalism or statistics? Because you would've learned about all about the sourcing/statistical leverages these propaganda machines are using to twist the opinions of people like you who are already biased towards the right.