User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 11
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. ...
  12. 50
  13. 51
  14. 52
  15. 53

Posts by Joseph R. Biden Jr, 46th President of the United States of America

  1. Originally posted by FreeAssange

    Lol he deleted the image. I guess he pussied out and... thinks deleting the resource somehow removes the link from here? Damn this guy is so dumb man.

    And exactly such bitch and idiot behaviour after all this noise lol:



    Originally posted by FreeAssange As for your big reveal, sorry, but if I cared, I wouldn't have posted links to my actual name. The place where I post most is probably the most controversial website on the internet right now, and my screen name there is my real name: Craig Nelsen. I've taken to using Free Assange lately because the guy shouldn't be forgotten.
  2. Originally posted by Zanick #2 He looks like he might've touched me long ago, if he were close by and had a reason for contact. I don't like being touched. That would've changed my vote.

    If you voted for Trump for this reason, you might have actual brain damage.
  3. My question is why the compositing breaks when he is forward past a certain point. The mics don't see to go under his legs. Maybe an automatically applied mask?
  4. Just get a bidet
  5. Originally posted by Joseph R. Biden Jr, 46th President of the United States of America Shut the fuck up faggot.

    I'm not going to read people's stupid wall of fucking text when they clearly, CLEARLY didn't bother to read what I wrote, or just straight up won't. FagAssange from the literal first time he replied to me, blatantly failed to actually read or understand anything I said.

    So sorry, not my responsibility to wrangle mentally retarded illiterates.

    Notice I'm still talking to Kev normally, because even though he's having trouble grasping the concept, he still tries to at least read all of what he replying to. It's not a COMPLETE waste of time and I don't have any problem replying to him in detail because at the bare minimum he bothered to fully comprehend what I'm saying.

    Rather than just not and fucking babbling.

    If that is what you plan to do… Didn't read.

    Didn't read
  6. Originally posted by Bradley You know how much of a loser it makes you seem to willfully engage in a debate with someone, just to reply "didn't read."

    Nothing against you, but we all come here for social discourse. So if you're not going to read things that disagree with you and then reply "Didn't read,' like wow.

    I'm happy I'm not that pathetic I start arguments with others, just to tell " I'M NOT LISTENING" when they start talking shit back.

    That makes you a bitch. Have fun arguing with yourself about how you're right. LOL.

    Shut the fuck up faggot.

    I'm not going to read people's stupid wall of fucking text when they clearly, CLEARLY didn't bother to read what I wrote, or just straight up won't. FagAssange from the literal first time he replied to me, blatantly failed to actually read or understand anything I said.

    So sorry, not my responsibility to wrangle mentally retarded illiterates.

    Notice I'm still talking to Kev normally, because even though he's having trouble grasping the concept, he still tries to at least read all of what he replying to. It's not a COMPLETE waste of time and I don't have any problem replying to him in detail because at the bare minimum he bothered to fully comprehend what I'm saying.

    Rather than just not and fucking babbling.

    If that is what you plan to do... Didn't read.
  7. Originally posted by DontTellEm I'm quiet w emotional stuff, because I'm not an emotional person I guess. Or I don't like to show it. I love deeply 💖

    Give me your number girl and I'll impregnate you
  8. Originally posted by FreeAssange haha, I beat your argument like it was a 14-year-old Palestinian boy in Israeli custody so you closed your eyes and put your fingers in your ears and went lalala–didn't read–like a little girl and refused to engage the actual argument like a man head to head. But here you are, you gonna sally forth and attack a "they" and "their" belief because "Because for some reason people like him don't feel validated in racism unless they can try to claim it has some scientific value." Why don't you point to something I wrote that justifies that sentence. You won't, because you can't. You wouldn't debate my actual argument, so instead you make something up ascribe it to me and then attack that.

    Weak.

    Here's some more weakness: you won't say whether you are jedi. What are you afraid of? Is it shame?

    I stand by my views in public using my real name. You won't even own your truth behind the anonymity of a screen name.

    Didn't read^
  9. More like gaycon
  10. Originally posted by Sophie One chronically uninteresting tryhard coming to the defense of another. Cute. Bring all the tryhards you want 10 of you couldn't hold a candle to the glory of my blinding radiance.

    You fuck kids, dude.
  11. Gay
  12. How can a system be meritocratic with generational wealth? It can't: your cum ball has no more merit than any others. On what merit should they get the benefit of a privileged upbringing?

    The answer is people don't actually like or want meritocracy. It's a cudgel to beat poor people with.
  13. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny is this a bad thing ¿

    Maybe if you don't want your balls cut off.
  14. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny you have mistaken the purpose of bukake for reproduction.

    it is not.

    It is more like the game of "limp biscuit".
  15. Originally posted by Sophie Don't worry about it,i am sure the majority of the userbase hates you too, dislikes you, or at the very least thinks you're an insufferable low IQ shitposter with nothing of value to contribute.

    All those things would still put me higher on the societal ladder than you, literal kiddy diddler
  16. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny if by being not a man i can legally sleep with little girls then i dont wamt to be a mane anymore.

    Now you understand the rise of transgenderism in the West.
  17. Originally posted by Kev those categories have a genetic basis, do they not?

    No because nobody had any idea about genetics was until the year 1865, and then Mendel's paper remained mostly unknown for another 40+ years

    money is an abstract medium to exchange goods but the goods themselves are very concrete

    Goods and services. "Services" aren't concrete at all. And what, you think "goods" are somehow etched into the laws of nature? You don't think "goods and services" are socially constructed categories?

    so is biology.

    Yes we actually have a scientific study of biology now, it's called biology. Societies are also real and they are studied by social sciences.

    culture and behavior is more abstract but it cannot be ignored that people gravitate towards those who are similar to themselves and congregate accordingly.

    And you think this is something other than social construction? What?

    so if you say the latter part is a social construct, you are technically right but then the point is too redundant to make a fuss of in the first place. what actual point are you trying to get across?

    How is it "redundant"? Where is the redundancy? It's just a fact that you need to admit: the concept of race is a pre genetic abstraction and is socially constructed, and it doesn't map to any well defined scientific concept.



    this is an extreme oversimplification but yes, similar genes give a population similar traits.

    So if a white skinned Norwegian has brown eyes and a dark Kenyan has brown eyes, they are the same race right?

    it was one example that showcased a biological basis for race. you agreed it isnt just a social construct that kalenjins run faster than nonkalenjins. different races have different traits that give them certain advantages and disadvantages, nothing to do with any social construct but genetic reality.

    I'm telling you you've done nothing to use it to establish a biological basis for race, you've just appealed to the concept of race again. It is circular reasoning and that literally invalidates your point.



    thank you!

    That makes my point, not yours.



    yeah but you are leaving something out, that gene that gives them the superior running advantage cannot exist without other traits, such as extremely dark skin among many other things. one part of the code affects all the others. its all connected.

    I.e. you straight up do not understand how genetics work at all< discrete vs continuous traits etc.

    Back to the example of Chief Spotted Crow's 1/64th native american great [great great...] granddaughter who might get his perfect hair genes as the ones that are expressed white being 63/64th balding Irish but those genes were not what she got for her hair. Perfectly possible scenario because by chance those alleles were passed down to her.



    answer my question first. i need to know where you are coming from. do you dispute any part of that sentence?

    It just doesn't mean what you think it means.
  18. I fucking hate you people
  19. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny that would be great.

    pregnancies are pedos worst enemy.

    97.22% of all man-child sexual relationshops were discovered and/or uncovered due to pregnancies.

    They will no longer be a man so their rate of offence will drop to 0
  20. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    failure of either communism or capitalism have nothing to do with economics.

    They have nothing to do with anything useful or relevant to society at all, that's my point.

    "They" haven't failed or succeeded. They never happened and they never will because either would be completely retarded in the context of the real world.

    Any critique of any system in history cannot happen through these lenses. Not the collapse of the USSR, not the successes of China, not the power of America or it's failure to provide for the least wealthy members of its society.

    It is just mental masturbation. You might as well be arguing Goku vs Superman: there's no fact of the matter because it is a category error, like there is no fact of the matter about whether or not Sherlock Holmes has a birthmark on the underside of his left testicle... It's a fictional character, such a mark was never mentioned so it was never confirmed or denied but that doesn't mean there actually is a fact of whether it exists or not.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 11
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. ...
  12. 50
  13. 51
  14. 52
  15. 53
Jump to Top